Case Study Graduate 2,162 words

Person-Centered Counseling Case Study: Relationship Issues

~11 min read
Abstract

This case study applies Rogerian person-centered counseling to a 29-year-old Hispanic woman struggling with low self-regard in the context of two troubled romantic relationships. The client believed her inability to "keep a man" reflected personal inadequacy, accepting responsibility for a partner's infidelity and another's reluctance to marry. Through empathy, unconditional positive regard, and congruence, the therapist helped the client recognize how conditional parental approval shaped her negative self-concept and distorted her sense of responsibility. The paper outlines presenting concerns, a theoretical case conceptualization, treatment goals grounded in Rogerian theory, specific therapeutic interventions, and the outcomes achieved, including the client's revised understanding of blame, forgiveness, and self-worth.

📝 How to Write This Type of Paper Writing guide — click to expand

What makes this paper effective

  • The paper grounds each clinical decision in established Rogerian theory, consistently tying interventions back to concepts such as congruence, unconditional positive regard, and the locus of control.
  • The case conceptualization clearly traces the client's presenting problem to a specific developmental origin — conditional parental love — giving the treatment plan logical coherence and direction.
  • The interventions section moves methodically from rapport-building to confrontation, demonstrating appropriate sequencing of therapeutic techniques within a person-centered framework.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates effective use of theory-to-practice mapping: rather than applying Rogerian principles abstractly, it translates each theoretical element (empathy, positive regard, congruence) into specific, named therapist behaviors — active listening, paraphrasing, personal anecdote-sharing, and graduated questioning. This technique shows readers how academic counseling frameworks operate at the level of session-by-session clinical decision-making.

Structure breakdown

The paper follows a standard clinical case study format: background and referral information, presenting concerns, theoretical conceptualization, treatment goals, intervention narrative, and conclusions. The abstract previews all major sections. The conclusions section does not merely summarize but reports client outcomes and remaining therapeutic work, giving the paper a realistic, process-oriented ending appropriate for a graduate-level clinical course.

Introduction and Client Background

The client is a 29-year-old Hispanic woman in a troubled relationship with her live-in boyfriend. Her boyfriend has not been able to reciprocate her level of commitment to their relationship and pursued an affair with another woman. The client has expressed anger about the affair, but her statements also indicate that she believes her partner's decision to violate their relationship was, at least in part, her fault. More specifically, she has indicated a belief that there is something about her that accounts for her inability to "keep a man," and that her partner was unable to commit to her and her young son — and ultimately had an affair — at least partly because she did something wrong or failed to do something in their relationship.

The client has decided to forgive her partner for cheating and seeks counseling to help her find peace in that decision, achieve genuine forgiveness, and better understand her situation. The goal of person-centered counseling will be to help the client recognize the ways that her negative self-concept causes her to accept fault and blame for the actions of others, and to help her recognize and understand the appropriate and inappropriate contexts of responsibility and forgiveness.

Presenting Concerns

The client presents as feeling "unable to keep a man in her life." She feels saddened and depressed that the father of her three-year-old son was unwilling to commit to marriage after his birth, and she feels equally saddened and depressed that her current live-in boyfriend has been unwilling to reciprocate her level of emotional commitment. She reports that whereas she would like for them to be married, he has resisted that commitment and engaged in an affair. The client considers her past relationship history to reflect the fact that she must be doing something wrong in relationships. More specifically, she has expressed the belief that her current partner initiated an affair at least partly because of things she said, did, or failed to say or do.

Other aspects of the client's account of her life reveal that she believes her parents love her, but that their love, emotional support, and approval are substantially dependent on her satisfying their expectations. Her account of her own motherhood reveals that she considers herself a "failure" in the eyes of her parents because she became pregnant and had a child out of wedlock. At the time of first seeking therapy, the client had made the intellectual decision to forgive her boyfriend for his affair and to remain with him, but she requested assistance with the emotional component of that decision and expressed considerable anxiety over her self-perceived inability to "keep a man in her life."

Case Conceptualization

It appears that within her family of origin, the client was subjected to parental attitudes and patterns of expressing love, approval, and disapproval that created the belief that the love of others is highly conditional — directly dependent on her satisfying their expectations and needs. She appears to accept the proposition that if a relationship with a man fails, or if her partner chooses to have an affair, the fault in both cases must lie with her own mistakes or inadequacies. Her account of her partner's infidelity is that the pressure she placed on him to get married caused him to seek out the affair.

This conditional self-concept has left the client substantially — if not entirely — unable to recognize situations where her partner is at fault for violating their relationship. She appears not to consider the possibility that the problem in her current relationship is not her fault, principally because infidelity is never a constructive response to relational pressure; in fact, it greatly increases any existing pressure. Meanwhile, the client seems unaware that her first relationship began to deteriorate only in its fourth year, after she began pressuring her partner to get married — pressure that arose largely because she desperately feared her parents' reaction to her bearing a child out of wedlock.

3 Locked Sections · 1,070 words remaining
Sign up to read these 3 sections

Goals for Counseling · 270 words

"Rogerian goals: congruence and positive self-regard"

Therapeutic Interventions · 530 words

"Techniques used to reframe responsibility and forgiveness"

Conclusions · 270 words

"Client outcomes and commitment to self-evaluation"

You’re 30% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 3 sections.

Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log in
130,000+ paper examples AI writing assistant Citation generator Cancel anytime
Key Concepts in This Paper
Person-Centered Therapy Self-Concept Unconditional Positive Regard Congruence Parental Approval Locus of Control Infidelity Forgiveness Self-Actualization Rogerian Theory
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Person-Centered Counseling Case Study: Relationship Issues. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/person-centered-counseling-relationship-case-study-54274

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.