This paper offers a critical review of W.C.H. Prentice's Harvard Business Review article "Understanding Leadership." It examines Prentice's unconventional approach to defining leadership — one that sets aside traits such as popularity and power in favor of goal execution and human relationship management. The review evaluates Prentice's arguments about motivation, psychological distance, and "low-pressure" leadership, while connecting his ideas to Bernard Bass's leadership theory and Rosete and Ciarrochi's research on emotional intelligence. The paper ultimately finds Prentice's framework insightful but notes that some of its ideals are difficult to implement in practice.
The paper demonstrates source synthesis — weaving together multiple scholarly references (Prentice, Bass, Rosete and Ciarrochi) to build a layered evaluation rather than simply summarizing one text. This approach strengthens the critique by showing how Prentice's ideas either align with or diverge from established research findings.
The paper opens by presenting Prentice's unconventional definition of leadership, then moves through his arguments on motivation and relationship management, next connects those arguments to Bass's leadership theory and emotional intelligence research, and closes with a concise overall assessment of the article's practical value. Each section builds on the previous one, maintaining a logical evaluative arc throughout.
W.C.H. Prentice's article Understanding Leadership, published in the Harvard Business Review, analyzes leadership through an unconventional lens. The author discredits the commonly recognized characteristics of a leader — such as popularity, power, showmanship, or even wisdom — as meaningful bases for analysis. Instead, Prentice argues that a leader is one who effectively marshals human collaborators and successfully executes a plan, even if that person possesses little skill or influence. In this view, leadership is fundamentally about getting things done. However, this approach risks undervaluing the leader's role in motivating and inspiring workers.
In Understanding Leadership, Prentice details the problems and illusions associated with motivating people. The article examines the complexities of interpersonal relationships as an impediment to motivation, while also exploring the most effective ways of encouraging others to perform tasks. Prentice believes that the Golden Rule — "treat others as you would like to be treated" — serves as an ideal motivational principle.
Yet the author acknowledges the pitfalls of perception, noting that "for followers to recognize their leader as he really is may be as difficult as it is for him to understand them completely" (Prentice 3). Prentice points out common sources of tension between leaders and their subordinates, explaining that a good leader maintains a psychological distance that allows workers to accept his authority without resentment, while also ensuring they do not feel diminished. An effective leader helps workers understand their role in the broader effort and applies tact in communication, training, and motivation alike.
To illustrate coordinated leadership, Prentice uses the example of an orchestra conductor directing a group of musicians — a situation that requires clear, well-understood rules that are easily followed. He concludes this section by advocating for "low-pressure" leadership, which he describes as an approach that "does not enlist the active participation of workers by showing them ways to personal fulfillment in the common task" (Prentice). According to Prentice, this style of leadership is best suited to sustaining long-term human relationships.
Prentice presents a useful guide on leadership, with particular emphasis on the development of relationships as a motivating factor. However, it takes time to develop the skills necessary to fully understand the complexities of human beings, and this cannot be achieved overnight. For a leader to succeed in this way, he must invest time in learning about his workers while simultaneously remaining focused on the work at hand. This challenge raises the question of whether Prentice's framework aligns with Bass's theory of transformational leadership, which holds that certain personality traits may naturally lead individuals into leadership roles — potentially reducing the time required to develop those relational skills.
Prentice, W.C.H. "Understanding Leadership." Harvard Business Review (2004).
Rosete, David, and Joseph Ciarrochi. "Emotional Intelligence and Its Relationship to Workplace Performance Outcomes of Leadership Effectiveness." Leadership & Organization Development Journal (2005): 388–399.
You’re 65% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.