Preventing Pressure Ulcers in High-Risk Cardiac Surgery Patients
This paper reviews a 2015 peer-reviewed article by Cooper, Jones, and Currie published in Critical Care Nurse, examining a quality improvement initiative at a medical center aimed at reducing hospital-acquired pressure ulcers in high-risk cardiac surgery patients. The review evaluates the authors' credentials, the study's purpose, findings, and broader contributions to nursing practice. Key outcomes include a significant reduction in pressure ulcers — particularly those attributed to medical device-related equipment — following implementation of evidence-based preventative measures, including prophylactic sacral dressings. The paper also reflects on the study's strengths and limitations, including its vague introduction and the absence of formal recommendations in the conclusion.
- Introduction and Article Overview: Overview of the reviewed article's title and scope
- Authors and Publication Context: Author credentials and journal publication details
- Purpose and Research Question: Study purpose and pressure ulcer prevention goals
- Findings: Significant reduction in hospital-acquired pressure ulcers
- Discussion and Contributions to Nursing Practice: Evidence-based practice applied to nursing challenges
- Conclusion: Study's broader implications for critical care nursing
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The review systematically addresses the article's authors, credentials, publication context, purpose, findings, and implications — providing a well-organized critical evaluation.
- The writer balances praise with honest critique, noting the vague introduction and the title's dramatic phrasing, which demonstrates independent analytical thinking.
- The discussion section clearly articulates two distinct contributions the study makes to nursing practice — one general and one specific — showing structured reasoning.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates source credibility analysis, a core technique in nursing and health sciences writing. The author evaluates the authors' certifications, the journal's peer-reviewed status, and the currency of citations before engaging with the study's content — modeling how to assess a source's reliability before drawing conclusions from it.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with author credentials and publication details, then moves to purpose and research context, followed by a summary of findings (including reference to a supporting figure), and closes with a reflective discussion of the study's contributions to nursing. The structure mirrors a standard article critique format appropriate for undergraduate health sciences coursework.
Introduction and Article Overview
This paper reviews the article Against All Odds: Preventing Pressure Ulcers in High-Risk Cardiac Surgery Patients by Cooper, Jones, and Currie (2015), published in Critical Care Nurse. The title's phrase "Against All Odds" reads as somewhat dramatic. The medical center's nursing staff implemented preventative measures to decrease rates of all hospital-acquired pressure ulcers, with a goal of zero preventable pressure ulcers (Cooper, Jones, & Currie, 2015). Although this implementation may have been challenging, describing it as being against "all" odds may overstate the difficulty.
Authors and Publication Context
The article has three authors who hold several degrees and professional certifications (Cooper, Jones, & Currie, 2015):
Danielle Nicole Cooper, RN, BSN, CCRN-CSC
Sarah Layton Jones, RN, BSN, CCRN
Linda Ann Currie, RN, MSN, ACNS-BC, CCRN-CSC
The authors' credentials include the Adult Health Nurse Specialist — Board Certified (ACNS-BC) and the Critical Care Registered Nurse — Cardiac Surgery Certificate (CCRN-CSC). The article is peer-reviewed and was published in the Critical Care Nurse journal in October 2015. It cites twenty-two different sources, most of which were published within the five years preceding publication.
Purpose and Research Question
The purpose of the research study was to analyze the results of a nursing staff initiative implementing preventative measures to decrease rates of hospital-acquired pressure ulcers, with a goal of zero preventable pressure ulcers (Cooper, Jones, & Currie, 2015). This initiative was based on hospital data that identified room for improvement. Best practices were applied throughout the implementation, including the use of prophylactic sacral dressings, which have demonstrated effectiveness in preventing pressure ulcers.
Although the research question is not clearly stated, the study was initiated to analyze and discuss the results of the implementation. The introduction is also fairly vague and makes no mention of the study's findings or methods, which is atypical of a standard journal article.
Conclusion
Overall, this study makes a meaningful contribution to critical care nursing by demonstrating how a structured, team-based initiative grounded in evidence-based practice can significantly reduce hospital-acquired pressure ulcers in high-risk cardiac surgery patients.
References
Cooper, D., Jones, S., & Currie, L. (2015). Against all odds: Preventing pressure ulcers in high-risk cardiac surgery patients. American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, 75–82.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.