Skip to main content
Research Paper Graduate 1,414 words

Evidence-Based Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Long-Term Care

~8 min read
Abstract

This paper presents an evidence-based recommendation for reducing the high incidence of pressure ulcers among elderly residents in long-term care facilities. Drawing on multiple studies rated at Level II or III evidence, the paper advocates a multifaceted prevention approach that includes validated risk assessment tools such as the Norton scale, structured repositioning schedules, specialized mattresses, and ongoing staff education. The paper also examines stakeholder roles, communication strategies, implementation barriers, a phased 13-month timeline, and a dissemination plan targeting the National Association of Directors of Nursing Administration in Long Term Care (NADONA/LTC). Together, these elements provide a practical framework for reducing preventable pressure ulcers, improving resident quality of life, and lowering long-term healthcare costs.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction: The Problem of Pressure Ulcers in Long-Term Care: Defines the problem and its growing significance
  • Research Findings Supporting Prevention: Synthesizes similarities and differences across studies
  • Recommendation for Practice Change: Outlines multifaceted evidence-based prevention approach
  • Stakeholder Influence and Engagement: Identifies stakeholder roles, interests, and resistance
  • Communication, Resources, and Barriers: Addresses outreach strategies and implementation obstacles
  • Implementation Timeline and Dissemination Strategy: Presents phased plan and NADONA/LTC dissemination target
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples

What makes this paper effective

  • Grounds every recommendation in specific cited studies (Elli et al., 2022; Haavisto et al., 2022; Yun & Park, 2020), giving each practical suggestion a clear evidentiary basis.
  • Addresses all dimensions of implementation — clinical, organizational, financial, and communicative — making the recommendation actionable rather than purely theoretical.
  • Acknowledges real-world resistance and resource limitations, strengthening credibility by not overpromising outcomes.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper exemplifies evidence synthesis for practice change: it moves systematically from problem identification, through literature review, to a concrete multifaceted intervention plan. By explicitly noting both similarities and differences across studies — such as divergent foci on biophysical factors versus safety culture — it demonstrates critical appraisal rather than simple citation of supportive sources.

Structure breakdown

The paper follows a standard quality-improvement reporting structure: problem statement → research findings → practice recommendation → stakeholder analysis → communication and resource planning → timeline → dissemination strategy → references. Each section builds logically on the previous one, mirroring the SQUIRE (Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence) framework the paper itself endorses. This scaffolded structure makes it a useful model for graduate-level nursing or healthcare management courses.

Introduction: The Problem of Pressure Ulcers in Long-Term Care

The professional practice problem addressed here is the high incidence of pressure ulcers among elderly patients residing in long-term care facilities. Preventing pressure ulcers in these settings is crucial to maintaining the health and well-being of residents. Pressure ulcers can result in severe pain, infection, and decreased quality of life, making proactive care and regular monitoring essential to avoid these preventable injuries. Moreover, pressure ulcers serve as an indicator of patient neglect, placing long-term care facilities at risk of costly litigation. Consequently, pressure ulcer prevention is an increasingly important concern given the sustained growth of the elderly population in the United States — growth that is projected to continue through mid-century.

Unfortunately, current practice frequently lacks structured monitoring systems and preventive interventions capable of facilitating pressure ulcer prevention. Beyond the human cost, the risks of not addressing this problem include increased patient suffering, higher healthcare costs, and a diminished quality of life for elderly residents. Studies such as those conducted by Elli et al. (2022) and Haavisto et al. (2022) highlight the need for improved risk assessment and preventive measures. In sum, it is critically important for long-term care providers to have an evidence-based framework that can help them prevent these otherwise-preventable injuries.

Research Findings Supporting Prevention

The research reviewed to develop this evidence-based recommendation identified several common themes, including an emphasis on risk assessment tools (e.g., the Norton scale in Elli et al., 2022), the importance of staff education and adherence to guidelines (Haavisto et al., 2022), and the effectiveness of preventive measures such as repositioning and specialized mattresses (Yun & Park, 2020). Each of these studies underscored the importance of ongoing evaluation and prevention measures as integral components of an evidence-based intervention.

Notable differences among the studies relate primarily to their specific focus areas: some examined biophysical factors (Arisandi et al., 2020), while others focused on broader safety cultures in healthcare settings (Abusalem et al., 2021). Notwithstanding these differences in focus, the consistency and quality of results were generally rated as high, with most of the studies reviewed earning a rating of Level II or III evidence.

Recommendation for Practice Change

Based on the findings that emerged from the research, a multifaceted approach to pressure ulcer prevention in long-term care facilities is recommended. This approach should include the implementation of regular risk assessments using validated tools such as the Norton scale, as highlighted by Elli et al. (2022). There should also be a strong focus on staff education concerning timely, evidence-based prevention practices, as emphasized by Haavisto et al. (2022).

While every long-term care setting and its resident population are unique, the recommended prevention program should incorporate structured repositioning schedules and the use of specialized mattresses, which were found effective in the study by Yun & Park (2020). In addition, integrating nurse practitioners into long-term care settings can significantly improve overall care quality and contribute to pressure ulcer prevention, as noted by Kilpatrick et al. (2020).

3 locked sections · 600 words
Sign up to read the full analysis
Stakeholder Influence and Engagement210 words
The successful implementation of this comprehensive pressure ulcer prevention program relies heavily on various stakeholders, each with unique contributions and potential hindrances. Nursing staff are crucial for the day-to-day implementation of preventive measures…
Communication, Resources, and Barriers215 words
Effective communication of the solution and implementation plan is vital for engaging all stakeholders and ensuring successful adoption. For nursing staff and other direct care providers, regular staff meetings…
Implementation Timeline and Dissemination Strategy175 words
A proposed 13-month timeline for this evidence-based recommendation is as follows:
Read the full paper →
Plus 130,000+ examples & all writing tools

References

Abusalem, S., Polivka, B., Coty, M. B., Crawford, T. N., Furman, C. D., & Alaradi, M. (2021). The relationship between culture of safety and rate of adverse events in long-term care facilities. Journal of Patient Safety, 17(4), 299–304.

Arisandi, D., Ogai, K., Urai, T., Aoki, M., Minematsu, T., Okamoto, S., ... & Sugama, J. (2020). Development of recurrent pressure ulcers risk factors in older patients: A prospective observational study. Journal of Wound Care, 29(Sup4), S14–S24.

Elli, C., Novella, A., Nobili, A., Ianes, A., & Pasina, L. (2022). Factors associated with a high-risk profile for developing pressure injuries in long-term residents of nursing homes. Medical Principles and Practice, 31(5), 433–438.

Haavisto, E., Stolt, M., Puukka, P., Korhonen, T., & Kielo-Viljamaa, E. (2022). Consistent practices in pressure ulcer prevention based on international care guidelines: A cross-sectional study. International Wound Journal, 19(5), 1141–1157.

Kilpatrick, K., Tchouaket, É., Jabbour, M., & Hains, S. (2020). A mixed methods quality improvement study to implement nurse practitioner roles and improve care for residents in long-term care facilities. BMC Nursing, 19, 1–14.

Neziraj, M., Hellman, P., Kumlien, C., Andersson, M., & Axelsson, M. (2021). Prevalence of risk for pressure ulcers, malnutrition, poor oral health, and falls — a register study among older persons receiving municipal health care in southern Sweden. BMC Geriatrics, 21, 1–10.

Ting, J. J., & Garnett, A. (2021). E-health decision support technologies in the prevention and management of pressure ulcers: A systematic review. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 39(12), 955–973.

Yun, H., & Park, J. (2020). Pressure ulcer risk factors and preventive intervention in long-term care facilities: A mixed-method study. Journal of the Korea Academia-Industrial Cooperation Society, 21(3), 147–155.

Key Concepts in This Paper
Pressure Ulcer Prevention Long-Term Care Norton Scale Risk Assessment Staff Education Stakeholder Engagement Nurse Practitioners Repositioning Schedules Quality Improvement Evidence-Based Practice
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Evidence-Based Pressure Ulcer Prevention in Long-Term Care. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/pressure-ulcer-prevention-long-term-care-2181125

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.