Public Relations: From Manipulation to an Ethical Profession
This paper evaluates the claim that contemporary public relations has successfully distanced itself from an era of deceit and manipulation to become a credible and ethical profession. It traces the evolution of PR from its origins as a technical function — associated with early publicity stunts by figures such as P.T. Barnum — through its development into a research-driven, academically grounded discipline. The paper examines public perceptions of PR, the distinction between PR and journalism, the establishment of professional standards and codes of ethics, and the role of universities in professionalizing the field. It concludes with the example of Barack Obama's 2008 presidential campaign as evidence of modern, ethically informed PR practice.
- Defining Public Relations: Core definitions and scope of PR as a profession
- Public Perception and Misconceptions: How the public misunderstands and mistrusts PR
- The Origins of PR and the Era of Manipulation: P.T. Barnum and early publicity stunts
- Professionalization: Research, Education, and Ethics: Universities, research, and ethical codes in PR
- Modern PR in Practice: Obama's 2008 campaign as ethical PR case study
- Conclusion: Affirming PR's evolution into an ethical profession
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper adopts a clear evaluative structure, stating its thesis upfront and systematically building evidence to support it — making the argument easy to follow.
- It grounds abstract claims about ethics and professionalism in concrete historical examples, from P.T. Barnum's publicity stunts to Barack Obama's 2008 campaign, giving the argument tangible weight.
- The paper acknowledges counterarguments and public skepticism about PR rather than dismissing them, which strengthens its credibility as an analytical piece.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of definition-led argumentation: by establishing a rigorous working definition of public relations at the outset (drawn from Wilcox, Philip, and Warren), the author creates a stable conceptual foundation from which all subsequent claims about ethics, professionalization, and public perception logically follow. This technique ensures the evaluative argument remains anchored throughout.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by defining PR and its management function, then addresses public misconceptions and the PR–journalism distinction. It traces the historical "era of deceit" associated with Barnum, before examining how the profession responded through universities, research, and codes of ethics. A contemporary case study (Obama's campaign) illustrates modern ethical PR in action. The conclusion returns to the original thesis and affirms it based on the evidence presented.
Defining Public Relations
The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the following statement: Contemporary public relations has successfully distanced itself from an era of deceit and manipulation to become a credible and ethical profession. To do so, the paper analyzes the development of the PR profession across all of its key aspects in order to assess the truth of that claim.
The first thing to establish is what PR actually is. Public relations deals with establishing, maintaining, and managing the relationships between any type of organization and the publics it comes into contact with. A large body of literature exists on this subject, and numerous scholars have attempted to define the activity in all of its complexity.
Perhaps one of the most suitable definitions is the one provided by Wilcox, Philip, and Warren, according to which public relations is:
A distinctive management function which helps establish and maintain mutual lines of communication, understanding, acceptance, and cooperation between an organisation and its publics; involves the management of problems or issues; helps management to keep informed on and responsive to public opinion; defines and emphasises the responsibility of management to serve the public interest; helps management to keep abreast of and effectively utilise change, serving as an early warning system to help anticipate trends; and uses research and sound ethical communication techniques as its principal tools. (Public Relations Institute of Australia, 2001)
PR is therefore a management function that acts as the active link between an organization and all of the publics that influence it or are influenced by it. It supports change and carries a strong ethical dimension. These are the main aspects that all facets of the profession share.
The fact that PR can be applied in almost every business area has led to a division and specialization of roles, ranging from corporate communications and public affairs management to media liaison, publicity management, promotions, and community relations management. The deep complexity of the profession can cause confusion among those who do not have much information about it — and this brings us to a very important aspect: the way in which people perceive PR.
References
Bernays, E. (1998). Counselling not communications. International Public Relations Review, 20(2), 28–32.
Gower, K. (2008). U.S. corporate public relations in the progressive era. Journal of Communication Management, 12(4), 1–19.
Heath, R. L. (2001). Shifting foundations: Public relations as relationship building. In R. L. Heath & G. M. Vasquez (Eds.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 1–9). Sage Publications.
Ledingham, J. A. (2003). Explicating relationship management as a general theory of public relations. Journal of Public Relations Research, 15(2), 181–198.
Newson, D., Turk, J. V., & Kruckeberg, D. (2000). This is PR: The realities of public relations (7th ed., pp. 90–91, 94). Wadsworth.
Public Relations Institute of Australia. (2001). PRIA code of ethics. Public Relations Institute of Australia.
Sharpe, M. L. (1994). Can any type of promotional or communication activity be classified as public relations? International Public Relations Review, 17(4), 19–25.
Taylor, M., & Botan, C. (1997). Public relations campaigns for national development in the Pacific Rim: The case of public education in Malaysia. Australian Journal of Communication, 24(2), 115–130.
Taylor, M. (2000). Toward a public relations approach to nation building. Journal of Public Relations Research, 12(2), 179–210.
Tench, R., & Yeomans, L. (2006). Exploring public relations (pp. 78–93). Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.