Review: Quality Research Papers for Religion and Theology
This paper reviews the third edition of Quality Research Papers: For Students of Religion and Theology by Nancy Jean Vyhmeister and Terry Robertson (Zondervan, 2014). The review examines the book's three-part structure, which guides students through the types of theological research, the research process itself, and the proper presentation of findings. The reviewer evaluates the book's treatment of topics including biblical exegesis, case study methodology, source evaluation, Internet research, and citation styles such as Turabian and APA. The review concludes that the book serves as an accessible, well-organized introductory guide for students pursuing academic research in religious and theological studies.
- Overview and Purpose of the Book: Book's four aims and three-part structure introduced
- Types of Theological Research: Chapters covering exegesis, case study, and dissertation types
- The Research Process: Selecting Topics and Finding Sources: Steps for choosing topics and locating library sources
- Evaluating Internet Sources and Taking Notes: Three-step formula for finding and evaluating online research
- Writing, Formatting, and Citation Styles: Grammar, organization, Turabian, and APA citation guidance
- Overall Assessment: Balanced verdict on the book's strengths and limitations
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The review follows the book's own structure chapter by chapter, giving readers a clear sense of the text's organization while weaving in evaluative commentary throughout.
- The reviewer consistently connects the book's practical advice to broader research principles, helping readers understand why each step matters rather than simply cataloguing content.
- Specific chapter references and direct quotations from the text ground the review in evidence, lending it credibility and specificity.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective descriptive-evaluative book reviewing: it summarizes each section's content accurately and then offers measured critical commentary, noting both strengths (clear structure, step-by-step accessibility) and limitations (inability to provide the most in-depth methodological analysis). This balance between summary and judgment is the hallmark of a strong academic book review.
Structure breakdown
The review opens by introducing the book's four aims and three-part structure. It then moves section by section through the text—types of research, the research process, source finding and evaluation, and writing and presentation—before closing with an overall assessment of the book's value for beginning theology students. The conclusion offers a tempered recommendation, acknowledging both the book's accessibility and its limitations in depth.
Overview and Purpose of the Book
Quality Research Papers, 3rd edition, by Nancy Jean Vyhmeister and Terry Robertson, updates the previous edition's guidance on how to perform research in religious and theological studies. The book's aims are four-fold: first, to promote and develop students' ability to perform research; second, to teach students how to better express themselves in research writing; third, to help students achieve their academic goals; and fourth, to serve as a comprehensive how-to guide with detailed, step-by-step descriptions of the research process.
The book is divided into three main sections, preceded by an introductory section that defines research. The first main section covers the different kinds of theological education research, from exegesis to doctoral dissertations. The second section deals with the process of carrying out research, from critical thinking and choosing a topic to using the Internet and organizing the parts of a research paper. The third and final section addresses presenting the research, covering proper paper formatting and APA citation techniques.
Chapter 1 begins with a good example of how to approach a research paper: start by defining your subject. That is precisely what Vyhmeister and Robertson do on the first page of their book, where they define what they mean by "research." They state that research is a "method of study that…arrives at a solution."1 Thus, implicit in the conducting of research is the idea that somewhere there is a problem the researcher intends to understand and solve. Taking it step-by-step is what research is all about.
The steps in that process involve: a searching process based on a systematic approach that can be duplicated if necessary; the collection of "adequate information" — data that is precise, to the point, and relevant; the obtaining of objective knowledge — a somewhat tricky requirement, since the empirical age is replete with subjectivism, though objectivity can be achieved by developing a theoretical understanding of the subject prior to research engagement; and the narrowing of one's research scope until it rests on a "single topic," because researching several topics or problems can quickly become unwieldy and too large for any one researcher to solve adequately. Most importantly, "research is the search for truth — God is truth," state Vyhmeister and Robertson. This notion captures the essence of the chapter and distills it into a simple statement. As long as the research adheres to a truthful approach to the problem at hand, the researcher will be on the right course.
However, that course can be adequately navigated by having a good understanding of the academic expectations for researchers in the field. These expectations act as signposts or landmarks — directions that help both the researcher and the audience understand what the study is about and where it is going. It is quite easy to be sidetracked in research, and it is important to use the guides that other scholars have accepted as common practice.
There are many kinds of research — from essays to sermons to reviews to theses to dissertations. Effective research is more than just a "compilation of quotes"; it is the gathering of data concerning a specific problem topic and the interpretation of that data to draw a conclusion or solution. It contains essential analysis — not merely a listing of points.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.