Realism in the 19th Century: Marx, Dickens, and Twain
This paper examines how three prominent 19th-century writers — Karl Marx, Charles Dickens, and Mark Twain — each engaged with the realist movement to address social and economic inequality. Drawing on Marx's Communist Manifesto, Dickens' The Old Curiosity Shop, and Twain's Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, the paper traces how realism rejected Romantic sentimentality and Enlightenment pomposity in favor of authentic depictions of working-class life. Each writer's distinct approach is analyzed: Dickens' graphic condemnation of industrialization, Twain's satirical exposure of American racial hypocrisy, and Marx's revolutionary materialism. The paper concludes that while all three writers identified genuine oppression, their responses — literary, satirical, and ideological — differed markedly in form and practicality.
- Introduction: Realism and Social Concern in the 19th Century: Defines realism and introduces Marx, Dickens, Twain
- Dickens and the Horrors of Industrialization: Dickens condemns urban poverty and industrial oppression
- Twain and American Racial Hypocrisy: Twain satirizes racism and hypocrisy in antebellum America
- Marx and Revolutionary Materialism: Marx's materialist call for working-class revolution
- Marx's Disconnect from the Working Class: Marx misreads workers; Frankfurt School reflects on failure
- Conclusion: Compares the three writers' differing realist responses
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper synthesizes three very different writers — a novelist, a satirist, and a political theorist — under a single unifying theme, showing the breadth of 19th-century realism's engagement with class and inequality.
- Textual evidence is woven naturally into the argument, with direct quotations from Dickens and Marx grounding abstract claims in specific language.
- The comparative structure allows the paper to highlight meaningful contrasts — Dickens' sympathy, Twain's irony, and Marx's prescriptivism — without losing sight of their shared historical moment.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative literary and cultural analysis, placing primary texts in dialogue with one another to illuminate a shared theme. Rather than treating each work in isolation, the writer uses each figure to reflect critically on the others — for instance, contrasting Marx's revolutionary materialism with Dickens' humane realism and Twain's ironic comedy. This technique shows how a single intellectual movement can produce radically different responses to the same social conditions.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a broad introduction to 19th-century realism and states its thesis. It then moves through dedicated sections on Dickens, Twain, and Marx in sequence. The Marx discussion is split across two paragraphs — one on his ideology and one on his practical disconnect from actual workers — before a brief conclusion that synthesizes the three writers' approaches and evaluates their relative fidelity to realistic principles.
Introduction: Realism and Social Concern in the 19th Century
As Fiero (2010) notes, realism in the 19th century focused on depicting life as it truly was — without the sentiment of the Romantics and without the pomposity of the Enlightened. Depictions of realism often focused on the commonplace — the common or working classes — as in the painting by Adolph Friedrich Erdmann Von Menzel, Iron Mill (1875). Writers approached realism by depicting characters and scenes that sprang from the page with authenticity, as in Dickens' The Old Curiosity Shop or Twain's Huckleberry Finn. Then there was Marx, with his Communist Manifesto: not content with a literary function, Marx wanted outright revolution. He wanted the working class to rise up and seize the means of production.
In any case, each of these three writers had a sense of class differences and of the oppression that some classes suffered more than others, though each had a different take on it. Twain retained his humor throughout and showed how an innocent boy could befriend a runaway slave. Dickens showed how a suburb of "red-brick houses," where not a leaf of greenery could be found to fill the soul with the meditative material that Wordsworth had such abundance of at Tintern Abbey, had a dreary and downtrodden effect on the lives of the common classes: "Men, women, children, wan in their looks and ragged in attire…" (Dickens, 1841, line 30 in Fiero). This paper examines Marx's Manifesto, Dickens' The Old Curiosity Shop, and Twain's Huckleberry Finn to show how writers in the 19th century expressed concern for social and economic inequalities.
Dickens and the Horrors of Industrialization
Dickens was an advocate of social justice in the 19th century: he hated that children were exploited in industries and used like slaves for labor; he hated the legal system, which seemed inclined to sentence people to death rather too easily; and he hated the materialistic impulses of the modern age (Diamond, 2003). He drew attention to the dreariness of the London scene, where people were packed like sardines into tin-can alleyways of brick houses where no light or life of nature's green goodness could be found. He described the aesthetic horrors of industrialization and urbanization on human life in the city: "on every side, as far as the eye could see into the heavy distance, tall chimneys, crowding each other, and presenting that endless repetition of the same dull, ugly form, which is the horror of oppressive dreams, poured out their plague of smoke, obscured the light, and made foul the melancholy air" (Dickens, 1841, lines 15–20 in Fiero).
Dickens condemned the way the industrialists and the merchants of Enlightenment thought oppressed and stifled the life and creative spirit of the working class. At every opportunity, he depicted London and its smoke, smog, fog, and soot as a kind of modern hell where man had lost his sense of humanity — though saving grace and virtue could still be found among some.
Twain and American Racial Hypocrisy
Twain did not project his scorn in quite the same way — but then he also was not living in London. Twain had the Mississippi as his escape, and it was on the Mississippi that he paired a young boy and a runaway slave as a perfect odd couple for highlighting some of the hypocrisies of American life in the antebellum South. Huck's crisis of conscience about helping a runaway slave to freedom is depicted by Twain with great success: the two sides of the debate are shown, with Huck literally caught between them, as Jim whispers that he is "true blue" while reward hunters display their misanthropy. Huck ultimately makes the right decision and prevents Jim from being handed over — but Twain humorously makes Huck believe he is going to hell for doing so.
The irony that Twain relies upon is that American society, with its Puritanical views and hypocritical racism set against the Constitution's embrace of equality as an ideal, was a hotbed of ridiculous notions designed to keep one class of people (blacks) oppressed so that another class (whites) could benefit.
Conclusion
Realism in the 19th century was deployed by artists to draw attention to the realities of life — to its coldness, depravity, hypocrisy, and inhumanity. It was about shedding sentimentality and pointing a finger at honest truth. Some writers, however, got carried away — like Marx, who called for action of a sort that was simply incompatible with reality. Others, like Dickens and Twain, contented themselves with depicting what they saw in humorous and sometimes horrific ways and left it to the public to decide how to respond.
References
Diamond, M. (2003). Victorian sensation. Anthem.
Dickens, C. (1841). The old curiosity shop. In The humanistic tradition.
Fiero, G. (2010). The humanistic tradition. McGraw-Hill.
Jones, E. M. (2000). Libido dominandi. St. Augustine's Press.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.