This paper is a critical review of Heather Kelly's article "Robots: The Future of Elder Care?" The review summarizes Kelly's argument that robotic technology may help address the growing global shortage of eldercare workers, particularly as the population over 65 continues to expand. The reviewer examines the benefits Kelly identifies — including cognitive stimulation, telemedicine connectivity, and companionship — and reflects personally on whether such technology would be welcome in their own family. The paper also critiques the article's brevity and its limited treatment of ethical concerns, while ultimately endorsing robotic care as a promising and necessary development for aging populations worldwide.
In the article "Robots: The Future of Elder Care?" Heather Kelly begins by considering the situation faced by many people today: they are aging and in increasing need of assistance, or at least companionship. At the same time, people willing to be trained in caring for the elderly are diminishing in number. The author points out that, by 2050, 16% of the global population will constitute elderly people. To avoid a crisis in care, Kelly mentions that researchers have begun to look toward technology to help manage the expected increase in the elderly population. In addition to automated homes, the author specifically considers the potential of robots to provide services such as detecting distress or simply providing companionship.
Kelly names a number of interesting benefits such robots may hold. They could, for example, play an important role in maintaining sharpness of mind in their owners by offering games, daily conversation, or cognitive challenges. They could also hold specific medical benefits, such as connecting patients and doctors through an online telemedicine platform. The need to visit the hospital for routine check-ups would therefore be greatly reduced. Family members could also stay in touch more easily and more frequently via online technology, which can play a significant role in ensuring the safety and well-being of elderly persons.
Kelly notes that, while Japan is already testing the technology for its own aging population, there are many ethical issues yet to be addressed. She also notes that the reliability and usability of the machines are still in need of considerable improvement. Robotic technology in caregiving contexts remains an evolving field, and much work lies ahead before such systems can be widely deployed.
"Student's personal response to robotic care"
"Critique of Kelly's article structure and gaps"
You’re 39% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.