Skip to main content
Essay Undergraduate 3,793 words

Romeo and Juliet and Atonement: Love, Class, and Gender

~19 min read 7 sections Literature · Romeo And Juliet
Abstract

This paper compares William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet with Ian McEwan's Atonement, examining how love, gender, social class, and violence shape the fates of their protagonists across settings separated by more than three centuries. The analysis explores how Juliet's patriarchal Verona contrasts with the more urbanized but still repressive Britain of 1935, tracing shifts in women's rights, marriage norms, and sexual politics. A research journal section broadens the scope, surveying the history of marriage, arranged unions, divorce, and romantic love across cultures, drawing on anthropological and historical scholarship to contextualize both works.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction: Three centuries of change in gender and society
  • Love, Class, and Sexual Politics: Class barriers and forbidden love in both texts
  • Violence and Gender in Both Works: Masculine violence and its destruction of lovers
  • Women's Freedom and Social Constraints: Female agency and repression in 1935 Britain
  • Briony, False Accusation, and Tragic Fate: Briony's betrayal and its consequences for Robbie
  • Conclusion: Patriarchy, emancipation, and the cost of repression
  • Research Journal: Gender, Marriage, and Culture in History: Historical survey of marriage, divorce, and romantic love
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples

What makes this paper effective

  • The comparative framework is consistent throughout — the paper returns repeatedly to both texts, preventing either work from dominating and keeping the analysis balanced.
  • Direct quotations from the primary texts (McEwan and Shakespeare) and secondary scholarship (Watts, Coontz, Jankowiak) are integrated smoothly to support analytical claims rather than substitute for them.
  • The research journal section strengthens the paper by grounding the literary arguments in historical and anthropological evidence about marriage, gender, and romantic love across cultures.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates sustained comparative literary analysis: it identifies parallel themes (violence, forbidden love, class barriers, female agency) in two texts from very different historical contexts, then uses those parallels to illuminate how social structures shape individual fate. The move from close reading to cultural-historical context is handled through secondary scholarship, showing how to integrate interdisciplinary sources in a humanities argument.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens with an introduction establishing the three-century gap between the two settings and the central thematic concerns. The main body develops comparisons across love and class, gender and violence, female freedom, and the role of Briony as both villain and narrator. A conclusion synthesizes the argument about patriarchy and social change. An appended research journal extends the analysis with historical evidence on marriage customs, divorce, and romantic love globally, supported by its own citations.

Essay 3,793 words

Introduction

Over 300 years of time separate the settings of William Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet and Ian McEwan's Atonement, and naturally the role and status of women changed considerably during that time. Italy in the 17th century stood much closer in time and culture to the ancient and medieval world, where women were the property of their husbands and fathers, marriages were arranged at a young age, and individual desires and free choice mattered little in a patriarchal and authoritarian society. Romeo and Juliet insisted on placing their personal desires above all else, going against the wishes of their families and the beliefs of their culture — though in the end they died because of it.

Great Britain in 1935 was an urban, industrialized nation where women had the right to vote and were increasingly working outside the home and attending universities; they became even more emancipated during the Second World War. Cecilia is a university graduate, for example, who ends up working as a nurse, and her lover Robbie also graduated from Cambridge, although this was still uncommon for someone from a working-class background. He had aspirations to rise into the professional class, become a physician, and perhaps even to marry Cecilia. Law and society had changed sufficiently by 1935 to permit women and men to make such choices, although Cecilia's family would most certainly have disapproved. Yet women were still not equal to men in 1935, and still possessed less sexual freedom and less social and economic power, particularly in a society that remained highly uncomfortable discussing such issues openly. Because of the malicious actions and misinterpretations of a young girl, Robbie is also falsely convicted of rape and sent to prison — and in the end this was the cause not only of his separation from Cecilia but also of his death.

Love, Class, and Sexual Politics

Romeo and Juliet has always been one of William Shakespeare's most popular and successful plays, even though critics have sometimes dismissed it as an immature or sentimental work. In that respect, Atonement is not sentimental at all but rather grimly realistic, although the love of Robbie and Cecilia also ends tragically. Shakespeare's play is also an important work of "sexual politics" and the desire of individuals to make a free choice, even when it goes against the will of their family and society (Watts 10). Juliet's father Capulet has the power to turn her into a child bride so his family can merge with the aristocracy, but instead she falls in love with the son of his most hated enemy.

No such family feud exists in Atonement, but social class is still important: Cecilia would be marrying beneath her station with Robbie, whose mother was a cleaning lady. Even today, marriages across class and caste lines are uncommon, and they were much less so in the 1930s. Like Romeo and Juliet, the attachment between Cecilia and Robbie was passionate and intense, and in both cases there is no way of knowing whether it would have lasted, given the tragic fate that overtook both pairs of lovers.

At age thirteen — the same age as Briony at the beginning of Atonement — Juliet seems more mature and practical than the sixteen-year-old Romeo, who falls in and out of love quickly. Cecilia and Robbie are older, since they are both university graduates by the time McEwan's novel opens, but Cecilia is still a virgin while Robbie did not even dare to approach her because her social class was much higher than his. Free love and personal choice in marriage partners is "historically, a relatively recent phenomenon, and more localized geographically than we may at first think," since many cultures had no real concept of it in the past (Watts 16). They believed in arranged marriages, dowries, bride prices, and contracts, with women and children as the property of their fathers and husbands.

Violence and Gender in Both Works

Both the play and the novel contain a great deal of seemingly irrational and senseless violence that destroys the lives of the main characters. In Atonement, the violence takes the form of a system that convicts Robbie unjustly of a crime he did not commit and then gives him the choice of serving in a war as cannon fodder or remaining in jail. Cecilia and Briony also experience the violence of wartime London, with regular bombing and endless numbers of badly mangled bodies flooding into the hospitals where they work. In Romeo and Juliet, the violence is the endless feud between the Montagues and Capulets, in which Romeo kills Tybalt in retaliation for the death of his friend Mercutio.

Shakespeare's play treats violence as a "masculine construct, and even the definition of masculinity is one of the coordinating topics," since the men are always dueling and brawling in public (Watts 12). In the early modern world of Romeo and Juliet, men still believe that "aggressiveness is a sign of real manliness," and that sexual and physical violence against women was a normal facet of life (Watts 13). Even the elderly Montague and Capulet are eager to join in the public brawls and duels between the families. When Romeo falls in love with Juliet he tries to become a peacemaker, but the honor code of that society demands that he avenge the death of Mercutio, even though it results in his own exile. In the end, only the deaths of Romeo and Juliet end the feud between the two families, and the violent, patriarchal society itself was the real cause of the tragedy.

Juliet lives a far more cloistered life than the Tallis sisters, since she is still literally under the control of her father and protected in her virginity by male relatives like Tybalt and the household servants. They would have been within their traditional and customary rights to have killed Romeo on the spot had they found him in her bedroom. In theory at least, as an adult woman in 1935, Cecilia has the right to choose her own husband, even though marriage with Robbie might have meant a break with her social-climbing and hypocritical family.

4 Sections Hidden · 1,675 words
Women's Freedom and Social Constraints320 words
Great Britain in 1935 was not nearly as repressive and patriarchal as the Italy of the 17th century, which is the setting for Romeo and Juliet. Women had won the right to vote by that time and…
Briony, False Accusation, and Tragic Fate390 words
Briony is the real villain of the novel, but also its writer. Perhaps her actions against Robbie were really unintended, and she imagines…
Conclusion185 words
Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet was actually ahead of its time in predicting that the future would consist of free men and women who chose their intimate and romantic attachments based on their own free will, rather than allowing these choices to be made by the authoritarian and patriarchal family. These changes were still in their infancy in the 17th century,…
Research Journal: Gender, Marriage, and Culture in History780 words
There is of course no simple answer to the question of how marriage has been defined throughout history, since its definition and purpose have varied greatly over time and across cultures. For most of human history, except in some tribal or matriarchal…
Key Concepts in This Paper
Forbidden Love Social Class Patriarchy False Accusation Female Agency Arranged Marriage Romantic Love Sexual Repression Wartime Violence Comparative Literature
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Romeo and Juliet and Atonement: Love, Class, and Gender. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/romeo-juliet-atonement-love-class-gender-115132

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.