Applying the SARA Model to Community Drug Problems
This paper examines the Scanning, Analysis, Response, and Assessment (SARA) model of problem-oriented policing as a structured framework for addressing community drug problems, with a focus on heroin abuse. It explains each of the four SARA steps in detail, demonstrates how the Crime Triangle and Routine Activities Theory underpin the model, and argues for an outcome-based approach that incorporates education, community outreach, law enforcement, and Broken Windows Theory. By integrating these frameworks, officers can identify, analyze, respond to, and continuously reassess drug-related crime in a systematic and adaptive manner.
- Introduction to the SARA Model: Overview of SARA as problem-oriented policing framework
- The Four Steps of SARA Applied to Heroin Abuse: Detailed four-step SARA application to heroin problem
- The Crime Triangle and Criminal Profiling: How criminal profiling builds the Crime Triangle
- Routine Activities Theory and Community Engagement: Routine Activities Theory as basis for crime prediction
- Outcome-Based Approach and Broken Windows Theory: Outcomes measured via Broken Windows prevention strategy
- Conclusion: Synthesis of SARA, Crime Triangle, and theory
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper applies an abstract policing framework (SARA) concretely by using a real, ongoing social problem — heroin abuse — as the running case study throughout all four steps.
- It integrates multiple criminological theories (Routine Activities Theory, Broken Windows Theory, and criminal profiling via the Crime Triangle) and shows how they support one another rather than treating them in isolation.
- The structured use of a numbered, subdivided outline for the SARA steps gives readers a clear procedural map while the surrounding prose provides analytical depth.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates applied theoretical analysis: rather than simply defining each model or theory, it consistently maps theoretical concepts onto a specific scenario (heroin in urban and suburban communities). This technique shows readers how abstract frameworks translate into actionable policing decisions, making the argument both descriptive and prescriptive.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by introducing the SARA model and its relevance to problem-oriented policing, then presents a detailed, step-by-step application of all four SARA phases to heroin abuse. It then explains the Crime Triangle and Routine Activities Theory as the analytical backbone of the model, before pivoting to an outcome-based discussion that brings in Broken Windows Theory as a supplementary strategy. The conclusion synthesizes all frameworks into a unified policing approach.
Introduction to the SARA Model
The Scanning, Analysis, Response, and Assessment (SARA) model of problem-oriented policing is an effective guide that takes the form of "action research" in the sense that police participate directly in the problem-identifying and problem-solving process of investigation and testing (Center for Problem-Oriented Policing, 2016). SARA can therefore be applied in a realistic setting with positive impact, meeting the need for police officers to take a structured approach to problem solving and delivering solutions.
This paper discusses the components of the SARA model, how the Crime Triangle works according to Routine Activities Theory, and how to focus on an outcome-based approach. Crime remains a problem in communities even as overall crime rates fall (Levitt, 2004). In many communities across the country, heroin usage has exploded in recent years. One effective way to address illegal drug use and drug trading is to employ the SARA model.
The Four Steps of SARA Applied to Heroin Abuse
The SARA model can be employed by officers in the community by following its four steps:
1. Scanning
The scanning phase involves identifying problems that recur within a community — in this case, the problem under scrutiny is drugs, specifically heroin. Officers must identify the impact and consequences of the problem (teens and adults becoming addicted to a deadly drug, families being destroyed, and theft and petty crime escalating). They then prioritize: drug-related theft stems from drug abuse and the drug trade, so the drug problem itself receives top priority.
The next tasks are to create an objective (reducing drug use, which will in turn help reduce theft and petty crime) and to confirm the existence of the problem. Here, the existence is confirmed by the daily and nightly emergency medical services (EMS) runs across the community to respond to overdoses. Officers must also identify how frequently the problem occurs and how long it has been ongoing — in this case, the heroin problem has been an issue since the U.S. invasion of Afghanistan, meaning for more than a decade. Finally, scanning requires focusing on specific problem locations, such as inner-city areas where drug sales are occurring.
2. Analysis
The analysis phase requires officers to understand the circumstances, conditions, and events related to the problem — in this case, drug addiction, social environment, and ease of access. Officers must describe the data that needs to be collected (quantitative data on drug usage, arrests, and convictions of sellers and users), study how the issue has been handled in the past, and note what current responses consist of and how effective they are.
Analysis also calls for adjusting the scope by isolating one aspect of the problem at a time, identifying resources that can improve understanding of the issue (such as interviews with drug users and sellers), and hypothesizing why the problem is occurring — producing a theory as to why heroin use is rising and affecting so many people.
3. Response
The response phase involves devising new methods of intervention, which could include community outreach, educational seminars in schools, and street foot patrols that allow officers to better connect with the community. Officers should also draw on knowledge of how other communities have addressed the issue by contacting other departments and council leaders across the country. From this research, they decide on the best intervention method, develop an adequate response plan, place goals at the top of the plan, and execute it.
4. Assessment
The assessment phase requires officers to evaluate the implementation of the plan, gather both qualitative and quantitative data before and after the plan is enacted, and assess whether goals have been met. Officers should look for ways to further develop the plan through new strategies and continue to assess the situation and evaluate the overall effect of the implementation on an ongoing basis.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.