This paper examines the scholar-practitioner (SP) model as applied to clinical research administration, arguing that academic integrity, scholarly writing, and effective teamwork are essential pillars for advancing knowledge in the field. Drawing on sources in research ethics, scholarly publishing, and organizational development, the paper outlines the components of high-quality scholarly writing, the ethical responsibilities researchers carry, and the role of professional learning communities (PLCs) in fostering collaborative knowledge-building. The paper concludes that lifelong learning, trust, and synergistic communication are indispensable to fulfilling the SP model's mission of improving, informing, and inspiring through clinical research.
Embracing the scholar-practitioner (SP) model in clinical research represents a critical responsibility to improve, inform, and inspire the lives of others: improve through scholarly research, inform through practical application, and inspire through leadership. Awareness of the importance of scholarly writing, theory implementation, and leadership influence is central to this mission. Being charged with such responsibilities is not for the faint of heart. Becoming independent scholars and critical thinkers who are ready to forge ahead in making valuable contributions to one's field of expertise requires a great deal of dedication, tenacity, and vision to cultivate a new body of knowledge (Dietzmann, 2005). To become successful, one must engage in scholarly writing, which is the basis for the SP model. Without academic integrity, effective writing skills, and synergistic teamwork, communicating new knowledge and influencing implementation will not be possible in clinical research.
Demonstrating responsible academic behavior is critical to upholding scholarly standards in high-quality research work, academic integrity and honesty, and adherence to ethical guidelines. Clinical researchers are stewards of their learning, while embracing collaborative efforts with colleagues and mentors. Showing care, concern, and professionalism will improve communication, which builds trust for mutually beneficial relationships and professional learning communities (PLCs). Hence, shared values of the clinical research community are to uphold scholarly standards through information literacy, thereby building new knowledge.
Becoming an effective scholar requires the assistance of a mentor and a team to provide the guidance needed for success. As a clinical researcher, receiving guidance through constructive feedback will improve knowledge and contribution to the research field, as research and formative experiences are paramount for the development of scholars and for new knowledge communities. More importantly, clinical researchers should perpetuate lifelong learning through scholarship efforts. Such efforts benefit personal information literacy, in turn affecting the information literacy of constituents and the broader PLCs.
The purpose of scholarly writing is to communicate original work with a unique perspective through research and analysis. Writing is formal and includes cited sources to support a position or argument. Authors are field experts who create insights for a specialized audience; however, those insights must be grounded in research and analysis rather than personal experience or opinion. Therefore, a scholarly piece is written to enhance or to create a body of knowledge (Dietzmann, 2005).
Scholarly writing components include the following (Paquette, 2009):
These components play a critical role in achieving the purpose of scholarly writing. Through conducted research, a thesis is deemed valid and credible by the academic community. According to Remenyi (1998), research must be accompanied by trust when collecting evidence, processing evidence, and using its findings. A fine line exists between upholding integrity and breaching areas of trust. To be charged with the task of scholarly writing is quite an honor; however, ensuring accurate and acceptable research that adds to the body of knowledge is no small feat.
The pressure to perform in the scholarly community may contribute to unacceptable scholarly writing practices. According to Hatcher (2011), writers face a myriad of complex, ambiguous, and morally sensitive decisions and dilemmas. The decisions they make may have a negative effect on their success. Additionally, scholars are rewarded based on published articles, and those with tenure may find their positions jeopardized by poor ethical choices. Scholars can avoid such pitfalls by internalizing personal ethics that form their professional identities (Hatcher, 2011). Furthermore, unsubstantiated scholarly writing may cast doubt on its authenticity. Girard (2004) discusses how many authors believe that publishing internet-sourced information is acceptable, and that the theft of ideas has proliferated because ideas and thoughts are treated as though they are already in the public domain with no original authorship.
"Team building and professional learning communities"
Without academic integrity, effective writing skills, and synergistic teamwork, communicating new knowledge and influencing its implementation will not be possible in clinical research. Demonstrating responsible academic behavior is critical to upholding scholarly standards in high-quality research work, academic integrity and honesty, and adherence to ethical guidelines. Scholarly writing is essential to communicate original work with a unique perspective through research and analysis; however, this is not attainable without effective communication and teamwork. To attain success, team commitment, trust, and motivation are essential, as the perceived commitment and trust within a research team drives performance. Therefore, the SP model embraces lifelong learning through quality contributions and the enrichment of others in the sharing of information, thus building knowledge through clinical research.
You’re 64% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.