Security Options, Training, and High Performance in Schools
This paper examines how Robert McCrie's recommendations on security operations management apply to a real-world case study: the implementation of the SIELOX CLASS security system at a public elementary school. Drawing on Holly Gilbert Stowell's account of the school's experience, the paper addresses four interconnected concerns: measuring the effectiveness of a security system, training non-security personnel to respond to threats, identifying the stakeholder and community needs that drive security operations, and balancing those needs against budgetary constraints. The analysis demonstrates that effective security management requires testing, stakeholder engagement, employee preparation, and realistic financial planning working in concert.
- Introduction: Security challenges and digital tools in schools
- Training and Development for High Performance: Measuring effectiveness and training non-security staff
- The Need for Appropriate Measures of a Security System's Effectiveness: Penetration testing and real-world system validation
- Security Training for Non-Security Personnel: Equipping teachers and administrators for security roles
- What Drives Security Operations: Stakeholder demands and legal mandates as security drivers
- Budgeting for Security: Balancing cost and protection with limited resources
- Conclusion: Four pillars of effective security management summarized
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Consistently anchors abstract principles from McCrie's textbook to a concrete, relatable case study (an elementary school adopting SIELOX CLASS), making theoretical claims immediately tangible.
- Maintains a clear dual framework throughout—stakeholder needs and budget constraints—and returns to both in every major section, giving the paper strong structural coherence.
- The conclusion effectively synthesizes all four pillars (measurement, training, stakeholder recognition, budget allocation) without introducing new material, reinforcing rather than expanding the argument.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates sustained application of a secondary theoretical source (McCrie) to a primary journalistic case study (Stowell). Rather than treating the two sources separately, the writer repeatedly triangulates between them, using Stowell's narrative evidence to validate McCrie's prescriptions. This source-pairing technique is a strong model for undergraduate argumentative writing in applied fields.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a framing introduction that previews its two-part argument (preparedness and resources). It then moves through two analytical sections on security measurement and staff training before widening to a broader discussion of what drives security operations, split between stakeholder need and budget. A concise conclusion restates all four claims. The progression moves from the operational (how systems work) to the organizational (why and under what constraints), a logical and effective ordering.
Introduction
As McCrie notes, "the training of employees and the development of their skills and careers is a critical and time-consuming activity within security operations."1 For an organization like a public elementary school, employees are more than likely already stretched to the limit in terms of time and ability: their primary focus is on teaching and assessing student achievement. Other stakeholders—such as parents—will nonetheless be concerned about safety, as Stowell points out.2 To keep stakeholders satisfied, managers and employees have to find ways to address security concerns on top of doing their full-time jobs of administering and educating. That can be daunting, but the Digital Age has helped bring security solutions into existence that ease this burden. Tools like SIELOX CLASS allow teachers to communicate with administrators, access campus cameras, alert authorities, trigger a lockdown, and keep students safe by responding quickly to a potentially dangerous situation and following procedures sent to them over their mobile devices.3
This paper will show how McCrie's recommendations about (1) choosing the security options that fit an organization's budget and (2) providing the type of security desired by stakeholders can help to ensure that (a) employees are prepared to engage in safeguarding practices—which includes having a proper measure of the effectiveness of the security system—and (b) employees have the necessary resources to support them, namely the proper training to guide them through the process of safeguarding in real time.
Training and Development for High Performance
Two ideas that McCrie addresses when it comes to training and developing workers and managers for high performance in security are (a) the need to measure for effectiveness and (b) the need for non-security personnel to have security training. Each of these is important for its own reasons. Measuring effectiveness is crucial because too many assumptions can be made about a security system's utility without that utility ever being challenged or tested. It is only through something like a penetration test that the actual merits of a system can be gauged. A penetration test helps to measure the overall comprehensiveness of a system in the face of a real threat.4
At the same time, not all employees are going to be security personnel—but they still need to know what to do in the case of an emergency. Training can be costly and time-consuming, and not every worker will have the ability to undergo extensive security training. Organizations have to find ways to meet their security needs as well as their budgeting needs.5 The example that Stowell gives with the elementary school perfectly illustrates how an organization can balance security and budgeting concerns to make sure all workers are on the same page and that security systems are effectively measured and engaged.
Works Cited
Agrawal, Rakesh, and Christopher Johnson. "Securing Electronic Health Records without Impeding the Flow of Information." International Journal of Medical Informatics 76.5-6 (2007): 471–479.
Lanz, Joel. "How to be Street Smart When Budgeting for Security." Journal of Accountancy, 31 Oct 2016. https://www.journalofaccountancy.com/newsletters/2016/oct/street-smart-security-budgeting.html
McCrie, Robert. Security Operations Management, 3rd ed. Waltham, MA: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2016.
Red Team Security Consulting. "What is a Penetration Test and Why Do I Need It?" Red Team Secure, 11 Jan 2018. https://www.redteamsecure.com/penetration-test-need/
Stowell, Holly Gilbert. "Checking in for Safety." Security Management, 1 Aug 2018. https://sm.asisonline.org/Pages/Checking-in-for-Safety.aspx
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.