Sharia Law: Sources and Features of the Islamic Legal System
This paper examines the origins and foundational principles of Sharia law, tracing its development from the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad and the Quran in the 7th century through its formal codification roughly two centuries later. The paper outlines how differing scholarly interpretations gave rise to four major schools of Islamic jurisprudence — Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali — and describes the principal features of the Sharia legal system, including its penal code, family law, and judicial administration. Drawing primarily on Noel J. Coulson's history of Islamic law and the Encyclopedia Britannica, the paper presents Sharia as a comprehensive code of behavior governing both private and public life.
- Introduction to Sharia Law and Its Origins: Sharia's 7th-century origins and theological foundation
- Sources and Early Development of Islamic Law: Scholarly debate and codification of Islamic legal sources
- The Four Schools of Islamic Jurisprudence: Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali schools compared
- Key Features of the Sharia Legal System: Penal law, family law, and succession rules
- Conclusion: Judicial administration and top-down legal structure
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper clearly distinguishes between the primary sources of Islamic law (the Quran and the traditions of Muhammad) and the secondary interpretive processes that gave rise to differing legal schools, demonstrating a grasp of the law's hierarchical structure.
- It concisely characterizes each of the four major schools of jurisprudence with a defining trait, making abstract distinctions accessible and memorable.
- The paper balances theological context (submission to Allah, divine revelation) with practical legal content (penal sanctions, family law, judicial procedure), showing how doctrine and practice interact.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses a chronological-then-thematic structure effectively: it first traces the historical development of Sharia from the 7th to the 10th century, then shifts to a thematic survey of the law's substantive features. This two-part movement allows the reader to understand why the legal system took the form it did before examining what that form looks like in practice.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with the theological foundation and historical origin of Sharia, then traces the scholarly debates that led to formal codification. It surveys the four schools of jurisprudence and their distinguishing philosophies, before turning to the substantive content of Sharia — including penal law, family law, and judicial administration. A brief conclusion ties together the law's top-down, divinely grounded character.
Introduction to Sharia Law and Its Origins
Sharia law originated from the Muslim religion, established in the 7th century by the Prophet Muhammad. The teachings of Muhammad and the Quran are the primary sources of this law, although the Sharia legal system was not formally established until approximately two centuries after his death.
The basis of Islamic law is the complete submission of the individual to the will of Allah (God). As Britannica states, "Sharia is not merely a system of law, but a comprehensive code of behavior that embraces both private and public activities." Because Muslims believe that divine revelations ceased when Muhammad died, they regard their religion and their system of laws as fixed and unchanging.
Sources and Early Development of Islamic Law
Despite these views, there was — and still is — room within the Muslim religion for interpretation of Muhammad's teachings as well as the text of the Quran. Judges and scholars were therefore needed to interpret these teachings and codify them into actual laws. As the laws developed, two major sects of differing opinion emerged. One sect believed that in matters not addressed by the specific text of the Quran, judges and scholars should be permitted to apply their own reasoning when interpreting the law. The other sect held that, outside of the Quran, everyone should adhere strictly to the rules that Muhammad himself established during his lifetime (Coulson, 99).
By the early 10th century, scholars sought to unify these differing interpretations of Islamic law. They determined that a consistent legal framework was necessary: a jurist should always adhere first to the Quran and the divinely inspired traditions of Muhammad. If scholars could reach a general consensus that a legal remedy aligned with these teachings, it would be recognized as "an infallible expression of Allah's law."
The Four Schools of Islamic Jurisprudence
By this time, Sharia had produced four established schools of thought, all of which remain prominent today: Hanafi, Maliki, Shafi'i, and Hanbali. Considered the most liberal of the four, the Hanafi school places a greater emphasis on the use of reason and is the most widely followed school of thought in the Muslim world. Maliki law is largely based on narrations of the words and deeds of Muhammad. Shafi'i recognizes a clear order of interpretive priority: the Quran first, then the Sunnah, then scholarly consensus, and finally analogical reasoning. The Hanbali school is considered the most strict and conservative school of jurisprudence (Coulson, 79).
Conclusion
Sharia law is traditionally administered by a single judge, who serves as the arbitrator of both the facts and the law. After the judge renders an initial decision, witnesses may still be heard before a final verdict is delivered. This top-down, divinely grounded legal framework — encompassing personal conduct, criminal punishment, and family relations — reflects the comprehensive and unchanging character that Islamic jurisprudence has held since its early formation.
Bibliography
Coulson, Noel J. A History of Islamic Law. Scotland: Edinburgh University Press, 1995. Print.
"Shari'ah." Encyclopedia Britannica. 2011. Encyclopedia Britannica 2006 Ultimate Reference Suite DVD. 5 May 2011.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.