This paper examines the ethical dimensions of Starbucks' business practices, with a focus on the 2008–2009 recession and its impact on the company's workforce and brand identity. It outlines the core facts of the Starbucks case, including the company's mission of social responsibility, its sustainability initiatives, and its "people first; profits last" culture. The paper then identifies the primary ethical issues raised by mass store closures and employee layoffs, along with secondary concerns such as fair trade coffee, genetically modified milk, and the displacement of local coffee shops. Finally, it proposes alternative approaches Starbucks could have taken to manage workforce reductions more ethically, including advance notice, compensation, retraining, and seniority-based considerations.
The case focuses on Starbucks, a company whose mission centers on social responsibility while simultaneously building the strength of its brand. Starbucks had been performing strongly in both areas until the 2008–2009 recession, when it was forced to close various stores and pull back some of its product offerings. The recession also compelled the company to innovate — for example, by introducing Value Meals — and to refocus on customer service as a key component of its brand identity.
The Starbucks culture has always been guided by the principle of "people first; profits last," and the company aims to treat all people with respect and dignity. Howard Schultz, Starbucks's founder, placed ethics at the forefront of the company's culture. A key priority for Starbucks is its involvement with sustainability, where it works with various international organizations and programs to improve conditions in poverty-stricken countries and to protect the environment. Its commitment to sustainability, its treatment of staff, and its role in the community — where Starbucks coffee houses have become "gathering spots" — have burnished the company's reputation and given it an attractive brand image.
Starbucks has, however, had to overcome its share of criticism, and it has worked to do so by introducing strategies such as Fair Trade certification on its coffee.
The 2008–2009 recession significantly impacted Starbucks, requiring the company to make drastic changes, reduce prices, and cut back on its expansion. This included closing hundreds of underperforming stores in the United States and in Australia. Starbucks's objective became one of focusing on its core strengths and amplifying these until the global economy improved. Its efforts concentrated on community involvement, outreach work, and improving its overall image and product offerings.
The key ethical issue arising from this case is that Starbucks closed many hundreds of stores, causing large numbers of people to lose their jobs. Many of these employees had worked for Starbucks for a long time and were dedicated workers who may have found it difficult to secure employment elsewhere. Furthermore, it was not only the employees themselves who were hurt, but their families as well — meaning that Starbucks's actions had an exponential effect on people's lives.
Secondary ethical issues for which Starbucks has faced criticism — as noted in the case — include the founder's connections with the Israeli army, concerns about fair trade coffee, the use of genetically modified milk, and the accusation that Starbucks is driving locally run coffee shops out of business.
"Ethical alternatives for managing workforce reductions"
"Reference list for the paper"
You’re 55% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.