Gender, Patriarchy, and Passive Protagonists in Steinbeck and Chopin
This essay offers a comparative literary analysis of two iconic short stories: John Steinbeck's "The Chrysanthemums" and Kate Chopin's "The Story of an Hour." By examining the passive protagonists Elisa Allen and Louise Mallard, the essay argues that both authors use their female characters to make pointed social commentary about women's constrained roles in private and public life. The analysis explores how nature symbolism reflects wasted potential and escapist fantasy, how both women are trapped in loveless marriages that stifle their passion and agency, and how each story concludes on a pessimistic note despite brief flashes of liberation. Together, Steinbeck and Chopin illuminate the psychological and social costs of patriarchy on women's inner lives.
- Introduction: Thesis on passive protagonists and patriarchal social commentary
- Nature Symbolism and Wasted Potential: Nature as symbol of repression, escape, and sexual energy
- Loveless Marriages and Suppressed Desire: Both women trapped in unfulfilling marriages without hope
- Pessimistic Endings and Fleeting Liberation: Brief liberation followed by death or despair
- Conclusion: Different strategies, same critique of patriarchy
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay draws precise textual evidence from both stories, using direct quotations to ground each analytical claim rather than relying on paraphrase alone.
- The parallel structure of the argument — applying each analytical lens (nature symbolism, marriage, endings) to both protagonists simultaneously — keeps the comparison clear and organized throughout.
- The paper moves from the symbolic to the psychological to the narrative, building progressively toward a thematic conclusion about the costs of patriarchy.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates the point-by-point comparative method: rather than discussing one text in full before turning to the other, the writer analyzes both works under each shared thematic lens. This approach emphasizes similarities and meaningful contrasts simultaneously, making the argument more analytically rigorous than a simple block-structure comparison would allow.
Structure breakdown
The essay opens with an introduction establishing both protagonists and a clear thesis about passive protagonists and social commentary. Three body sections follow: the first examines nature symbolism as a vehicle for repressed energy and escape; the second addresses marriage, age, and suppressed passion; the third compares the pessimistic endings. A brief conclusion reframes the thesis, noting that while Steinbeck reveals more about Elisa than Chopin does about Louise, both authors ultimately expose the pitfalls of patriarchy.
Introduction
Elisa Allen is the protagonist of John Steinbeck's short story "The Chrysanthemums." Louise Mallard is the protagonist of Kate Chopin's "The Story of an Hour." Both Elisa and Louise are products of their social and historical contexts, particularly when it comes to gender norms. Both are passive protagonists, because patriarchy has stripped them of political agency.
By creating passive protagonists in their respective short stories, Steinbeck and Chopin make powerful social commentary about the role of women in their private and public lives.
Nature Symbolism and Wasted Potential
Both Elisa and Louise feel stuck in their marriages, yet perceive liberation as impossible within the confines of their culture. In both stories, nature symbolizes wasted potential. Elisa is capable of so much more than gardening: "The chrysanthemum stems seemed too small and easy for her energy" (Steinbeck). Similarly, Louise receives her epiphany through nature: "She felt it, creeping out of the sky, reaching toward her through the sounds, the scents, the color that filled the air" (Chopin).
Nature also symbolizes fantasy and escape for both protagonists. Elisa is most passionate when she speaks about chrysanthemums, especially in her conversation with the transient man. Louise, by contrast, confines herself indoors and can experience nature only through a window. As Chopin writes, "But now there was a dull stare in her eyes, whose gaze was fixed away off yonder on one of those patches of blue sky. It was not a glance of reflection, but rather indicated a suspension of intelligent thought." Elsewhere, Chopin notes, "She could see in the open square before her house the tops of trees that were all aquiver with the new spring life."
Beyond escapism, gardening symbolizes Elisa's pent-up sexual energy — a dimension that remains more thoroughly repressed in Louise. Steinbeck's language is suggestive: "I had ten-inch blooms this year," she said. The physical description reinforces this reading: "She was kneeling on the ground looking up at him. Her breast swelled passionately." Her passion eventually bursts through in the exclamation, "Why, you rise up and up! Every pointed star gets driven into your body. It's like that. Hot and sharp and — lovely."
Loveless Marriages and Suppressed Desire
Both Elisa and Louise long to be liberated from loveless marriages. Significantly, both protagonists are described as young and in their sexual prime. Chopin writes of Louise: "She was young, with a fair, calm face, whose lines bespoke repression and even a certain strength." Steinbeck describes Elisa in similar terms: "She was thirty-five. Her face was lean and strong and her eyes were as clear as water."
Despite their vitality, both women are trapped. Henry is kind but overly protective of his wife and does not allow her passion for life to flourish. For Louise, it is only Brently's death that enables her to recognize how miserable she had actually been. Neither woman holds any real hope for liberation, because pursuing it would violate deeply entrenched social norms. Chopin captures Louise's internal struggle vividly: "she was striving to beat it back with her will — as powerless as her two white slender hands would have been." Elisa's suppression is rendered externally: "She tried not to look as they passed it, but her eyes would not obey" (Steinbeck).
Conclusion
Steinbeck reveals far more about Elisa than Chopin does about Louise, yet their respective storytelling strategies serve the same ultimate goal: revealing the pitfalls of patriarchy. Through nature symbolism, portraits of loveless marriage, and pessimistic resolutions, both authors expose how social and historical constraints rob women of agency, passion, and self-determination. Read together, The Chrysanthemums and The Story of an Hour stand as enduring critiques of a patriarchal order that confines women to passive, diminished versions of themselves.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.