Gender, Dependence, and Fate in "Amnesty" and "Life in the Iron Mills"
This essay examines themes of gender, dependence, and fate in Nadine Gordimer's short story "Amnesty" and Rebecca Harding Davis's "Life in the Iron Mills." Rather than accepting a straightforward reading in which women are dependent on men, the essay argues that men are equally reliant on the women in their lives — for sustenance, childcare, and emotional continuity. The paper also considers whether any character truly controls their own fate, concluding that individual destinies are deeply entangled with those of partners and children. The South African apartheid context of "Amnesty" is used to illustrate how external political forces further constrain personal agency, particularly for women.
- Introduction: Rethinking Dependence Between Men and Women: Challenges the view that women depend on men
- Strength Hidden Beneath the Surface: Deborah in 'Life in the Iron Mills': Deborah's quiet strength sustains the man she serves
- Fate, Apartheid, and the Unity of Lives in 'Amnesty': Apartheid separates a couple and entangles their fates
- Conclusion: Shared Fates and the Cost of Selfishness: Selfish choices within shared destinies cause lasting harm
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The essay resists a simplistic reading of female dependence by inverting the lens: it argues that men depend on women rather than the other way around, which gives the analysis an original angle.
- A well-chosen direct quotation from Davis anchors the claim about Deborah's hidden strength in textual evidence rather than assertion alone.
- The apartheid context in the discussion of "Amnesty" connects the personal to the political, showing how external forces limit individual agency.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates comparative literary analysis: it reads two texts side by side to develop a shared thematic argument, using each story to illuminate and reinforce what the other reveals about gender and fate. This technique is supported by close reading of a primary text passage and contextual framing (apartheid South Africa).
Structure breakdown
The essay opens by framing the question of dependence and immediately complicates the conventional view. The second movement uses a direct quotation to ground the claim about women's hidden strength in "Life in the Iron Mills." The third movement shifts to "Amnesty," introducing the concept of fate and the way political circumstances override personal choice. A brief concluding observation ties both stories together through the idea that selfishness within an entangled destiny harms those left behind.
Introduction: Rethinking Dependence Between Men and Women
The question of independence and strength in Amnesty and Life in the Iron Mills depends greatly on how one views the role of women. One reading suggests that women's independence and strength appear negative when measured against their dependence on men. An alternate reading, however, reveals that men are actually quite dependent upon women. In each of these stories, the man is entirely reliant on the woman — the woman who works in the iron mills to bring him his supper, or who raises his children while he fights for political freedom. The reality is that neither partner is truly independent of the other; rather, the two form a team. Men and women together make life what it is — and that sometimes includes hardships and heartaches, and sometimes includes joys.
Strength Hidden Beneath the Surface: Deborah in 'Life in the Iron Mills'
Strength comes in many different forms and is sometimes hidden beneath the surface of apparent weakness. This is true of Deborah's character in Life in the Iron Mills by Rebecca Harding Davis. As the narrator observes: "It was far, and she was weak, aching from standing twelve hours at the spools. Yet it was her almost nightly walk to take this man his supper, though at every square she sat down to rest, and she knew she should receive small word of thanks" (Davis 437). Were Deborah truly lacking in strength, she would not be able to accomplish this task at all. It is she who keeps "this man" alive — and so to describe her as dependent upon him is to view the relationship from a skewed angle. The man's life, in a very direct sense, depends upon her. Whatever problems he himself faces may be too deep for her to address, given all the other duties and responsibilities she carries.
Conclusion: Shared Fates and the Cost of Selfishness
Thinking about oneself only — as the man in Amnesty seems to do, concentrating on the cause of anti-apartheid resistance instead of on his family — is a selfish way to approach this unity of fates, and it can cause real harm to the others involved. This is precisely what happens to the woman in the story, who is left longing for the past and for the man her partner used to be. Both stories ultimately suggest that strength, dependence, and fate are never truly individual matters: they are always shared.
Works Cited
Davis, Rebecca Harding. "Life in the Iron Mills." Gutenberg. Web. 9 Feb 2017.
Gordimer, Nadine. "Amnesty." The New Yorker. 1990. Web. 9 Feb 2017.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.