Skip to main content
Essay Undergraduate 840 words

Subjectivity and Truth in The Barkley Marathons Documentary

~5 min read
Abstract

This paper examines the 2018 documentary The Barkley Marathons: Where Dreams Go to Die through the lens of competing documentary theories. Drawing on Alexandra Juhasz and Alisa Lebow's manifesto "Beyond Story" and Trinh Minh-ha's "The Totalizing Quest of Meaning," the paper argues that the film simultaneously embodies and undermines the radical potential of documentary filmmaking. While the film avoids Hollywood commercialism and chronicles a genuinely obscure subject, it ultimately prioritizes personal narrative and idealized storytelling over broader social or political context, filtering factual reality through a subjective perspective that glorifies the race without critically examining its purpose or risks.

Key Takeaways
  • Introduction: Competing Theories of Documentary Truth: Contrasting Juhasz/Lebow and Trinh Minh-ha on documentary truth
  • The Barkley Marathons as an Unconventional Documentary: Film's non-Hollywood format and story-driven focus
  • Cultural Context and Mystique: Rural Tennessee setting and Laz Lake's enigmatic role
  • Subjectivity and Idealization in the Film's Perspective: How the film idealizes runners and avoids critical questioning
  • Conclusion: Factual content filtered through subjective, idealized perspective
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples

What makes this paper effective

  • It applies two contrasting theoretical frameworks — Juhasz/Lebow and Trinh Minh-ha — directly to a specific film, showing how the documentary both satisfies and contradicts each position.
  • The analysis moves from broad theoretical framing to concrete textual evidence, such as the portrayal of Laz Lake and the treatment of Gary Robbins, grounding abstract claims in observable film details.
  • The paper maintains a clear argumentative thread throughout: that even non-commercial documentaries impose a subjective perspective that shapes how "truth" is received by audiences.

Key academic technique demonstrated

The paper demonstrates theoretical application — taking established academic frameworks and using them as analytical lenses on a primary cultural object. Rather than summarizing the theories in isolation, the writer tests each against specific scenes and choices in the documentary, revealing productive tensions between the two positions.

Structure breakdown

The paper opens by introducing and contrasting two documentary theories, then briefly describes the film under analysis. Subsequent sections apply those theories to the film's unconventional format, its cultural setting, and the subjective framing of its central narrative. The conclusion synthesizes these observations into a unified argument about documentary subjectivity. The structure is straightforward and well-suited to a short analytical essay.

Introduction: Competing Theories of Documentary Truth

In their manifesto "Beyond Story," Alexandra Juhasz and Alisa Lebow declare, "We need documentary. We need it to help interpret the world."1 The authors condemn cinematic, fictional storytelling as inherently polluted by commercialism. Conventional commercial filmmaking, they argue, takes individuals out of the communities that produced them, thus alienating audiences from the economic, social, historical, and other material forces that shape those individuals' lives. In other words, documentaries possess a political power to convey truth that conventional cinema does not, by rooting narratives in fact rather than story.

In stark contrast, Trinh Minh-ha, in "The Totalizing Quest of Meaning," argues: "There is no such thing as documentary… Truth and meaning: the two are likely to be equated with one another. Yet, what is put forth as truth is often nothing more than a meaning."2 Although documentaries purport to convey absolute truth, they in fact convey a very specific version of that truth and should not be confused with objective reality.

The Barkley Marathons as an Unconventional Documentary

The 2018 documentary The Barkley Marathons: Where Dreams Go to Die, directed by Ethan Newberry, encompasses elements of what Juhasz and Lebow both celebrate and despise. On one hand, it is very much not a Hollywood documentary. It is produced by a small filmmaker who takes advantage of YouTube as a platform for disseminating content. It chronicles a relatively obscure sport — ultra-running — and one of the most difficult events within it. The Barkley Marathons is so challenging that very few participants have ever finished it.

On the other hand, the film is very much a story-driven work, following Canadian runner Gary Robbins in his attempt to complete the race. Rather than focusing on a broader social and political context — which Juhasz and Lebow see as the radical potential of documentary filmmaking — it tells a story with clear parallels to popular fictional narratives: not just the sports film centered on a pivotal competition, but also the timeless archetype of human beings pitting themselves against nature.

Cultural Context and Mystique

Another distinct feature of the film is its cultural context. The race takes place in a rural area of Tennessee, and because many of the runners come from outside the rural South — including internationally — a strange mystique surrounds the race organizer, "Laz Lake" Cantrell. He is portrayed as a quasi-mystical figure, uttering obscure phrases in the background. Unlike conventional running races, the start time is uncertain: participants camp out and wait for the signal, a blowing conch shell, which Laz sounds whenever he chooses. Navigation is difficult, there is no clearly marked path through the woods, and the various loops of the course can be treacherous.

The film's narrator ominously warns viewers about the dangers of the race as more and more runners drop out. Very few competitors have ever finished, yet many become obsessed with the challenge, returning year after year after subjecting themselves to grueling training regimens.

1 locked section · 230 words
Sign up to read the full analysis
Subjectivity and Idealization in the Film's Perspective230 words
The subjectivity that Minh-ha describes in his essay on the nature of the documentary medium is clearly visible in the way the runners' quest is presented in an idealized light. The film never questions whether their goal of completing the race…
Read the full paper →
Plus 130,000+ examples & all writing tools

Conclusion

The documentary presents many real facts about running the race — including how runners navigate the terrain, fuel their bodies, and strategize — but this factual reality is still filtered through a very specific perspective, one that idealizes the race and a sport in which participants willingly place themselves at risk for no clearly articulated purpose. In this way, the film illustrates Minh-ha's central insight: even a non-commercial, independently produced documentary does not deliver unmediated truth. It delivers a meaning — shaped by the filmmaker's choices — dressed in the appearance of truth.

Bibliography

The Barkley Marathons: Where Dreams Go to Die. Directed by Ethan Newberry. 2018. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NDZdsqbcGTU

Juhasz, Alexandra, and Alisa Lebow. "Beyond Story: An Online, Community-Based Manifesto." World Records, vol. 2, no. 3 (2018): 1–5.

Minh-ha, Trinh. "The Totalizing Quest of Meaning." In Theorizing Documentary, 90–107. New York: Routledge, 1993.

Key Concepts in This Paper
Documentary Subjectivity Narrative Truth Ultra-Running Trinh Minh-ha Beyond Story Idealization Non-Commercial Film Cultural Mystique Storytelling vs. Reality Perspective Filtering
Cite This Paper
PaperDue. (2026). Subjectivity and Truth in The Barkley Marathons Documentary. PaperDue. https://www.paperdue.com/study-guide/subjectivity-truth-barkley-marathons-documentary-2181851

Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.