Therapeutic Approaches to Mental Health Care in Hospitals
This paper examines therapeutic approaches to mental health care, with a focus on hospitalized patients experiencing cognitive impairment, behavioral disorders, and psychiatric emergencies. It discusses a quality improvement project demonstrating that therapeutic activities reduce patient frustration by 73% during intervention and 64% one hour after. The paper outlines the role of psychiatric nurses in managing complex patient needs, the function of patient sitters, and evidence-based nursing interventions that reduce reliance on physical restraints, which are associated with increased agitation and injury risk. The analysis emphasizes the nursing process as a critical thinking framework for clinical decision-making and patient care.
- Introduction: Patient Safety and Frustration Management: Hospitalized monitored patients face frustration and safety risks
- The Therapeutic Activities Intervention: Quality improvement study shows therapeutic activities reduce frustration
- The Role of Patient Sitters: Staff observation and safety monitoring for at-risk patients
- Psychiatric Nursing Practice and Competencies: Expert nursing roles and multidisciplinary mental health care
- Nursing Process and Clinical Decision-Making: Framework for assessment, planning, and evidence-based interventions
- Conclusion: Evidence-Based Care and Patient Outcomes: Alternatives to restraints improve cognitive function and safety
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Opens with a concrete clinical problem (hospitalized patients with behavioral challenges) that immediately contextualizes the need for intervention.
- Presents a quality improvement study with measurable outcomes (73% reduction in frustration during activity, 64% sustained reduction one hour post-activity), grounding the argument in evidence rather than theory alone.
- Systematically builds the case by defining roles (sitters, psychiatric nurses) and then connecting each role to specific patient needs and outcomes.
- Addresses a critical alternative (physical restraints) and explains why it is ineffective or harmful, strengthening the argument for therapeutic approaches.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses a problem-evidence-solution structure common in healthcare quality improvement writing. It identifies a clinical gap (frustration and safety risks in monitored patients), presents empirical data from a published intervention study, and expands the discussion to show how broader psychiatric nursing practice and the nursing process support this solution. This layering of specific evidence (the Waszynski study) with conceptual frameworks (nursing competencies, nursing process) creates both credibility and transferability.
Structure breakdown
The essay moves from problem definition (patients under observation suffer frustration-related safety risks) through a specific intervention study, then widens to examine the professional context: who provides observation (sitters), what expertise is needed (psychiatric nursing), and how clinical decisions are made (nursing process). The conclusion returns to the core problem to show how evidence-based alternatives to restraint improve outcomes, tying the specific intervention back to broader clinical practice.
Introduction: Patient Safety and Frustration Management
Hospitalized patients suffering from delirium, cognitive impairment, suicidal ideation, traumatic brain injury, or behavior-altering conditions require constant observation by trained staff. These patients can become frustrated easily, which can compromise their safety even when a sitter is present. Hospitalization is intrinsically demanding: patients are already injured or ill, feel vulnerable in an unfamiliar environment, and experience loss of control. This loss of control often creates anxiety and frustration, which is especially pronounced in patients with cognitive disorders and psychiatric conditions. These patients face heightened risk of self-harm through impulsive behavior and treatment disruption.
Conventional nursing interventions to reduce these risks—such as exit alarms to restrict independent movement and concealing medical equipment—are not feasible for this population. Instead, constant monitoring is required for proper safety. Most hospitals have protocols and guidelines governing continuous observation, typically provided by nursing assistants, nursing students, or trained staff members known as sitters.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.