Therapeutic Lying in Nursing: An Ethical Analysis
This paper examines the ethical dilemma of "therapeutic lying" in nursing, with particular focus on nurses who withhold or misrepresent distressing information from vulnerable patients, including those with dementia. The paper identifies and analyzes three ethical principles at stake — nonmaleficence, fidelity, and paternalism — alongside two ethical theories: deontology and feminist ethics. It explores how these frameworks conflict, reviews relevant legal and regulatory obligations, and proposes a deontological resolution grounded in truthfulness as a moral duty. The paper concludes by connecting the proposed resolution to the ANA Code of Ethics, specifically its fourth provision on accountability, fidelity, and patient self-determination.
- Introduction: The Dilemma of Therapeutic Lying: Nurses face pressure to lie to vulnerable patients
- Ethical Principles and Theories at Issue: Nonmaleficence, fidelity, paternalism, deontology, feminist theory
- How the Ethical Principles and Theories Conflict: Competing principles clash over truth-telling in care
- Current Laws and Regulations at Issue: State law mandates disclosure; fiduciary duties apply
- Ethical Theory Identification and Resolution Proposal: Deontology supports truth-telling as moral duty
- Relationship with the ANA Code of Ethics: ANA provision four grounds resolution in fidelity
- How the Proposed Resolution Promotes Ethical Justice: Truthfulness strengthens nurse-patient relationship
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper systematically maps a real clinical scenario — nurses lying to dementia patients — onto established ethical frameworks, making abstract principles concrete and applicable.
- It balances competing principles honestly, acknowledging that both sides of the debate (nonmaleficence/paternalism vs. fidelity/deontology) have legitimate grounding before arriving at a reasoned resolution.
- The integration of the ANA Code of Ethics gives the argument institutional authority and connects the theoretical resolution to professional practice standards.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates structured ethical analysis: it isolates the dilemma, identifies relevant principles and theories, articulates how they conflict, and then proposes and justifies a resolution — a method that mirrors formal applied-ethics reasoning used in nursing and bioethics literature.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a labeled, section-by-section format common in nursing ethics coursework. It opens with the clinical dilemma, moves through principle and theory identification, addresses legal context, proposes a resolution via deontology, anchors the resolution in the ANA Code, and closes by explaining how the resolution advances ethical justice. Each section builds logically on the previous one, producing a coherent and complete ethical argument.
Introduction: The Dilemma of Therapeutic Lying
Nurses face dilemmas of an ethical nature on a regular basis. This effectively means that from time to time, nurses are called upon to make ethical decisions — decisions that could have a significant impact on the well-being of patients. One of the current ethical issues being faced by nurses is whether or not to lie to patients. Recently, it was revealed that psychiatrists and nurses caring for dementia patients were actively practicing what Williams (2013) refers to as "therapeutic lying" in an attempt to keep those patients happy. As Williams further points out, 98% of nurses admitted to lying to dementia patients. The central question that must be answered is: should nurses withhold potentially upsetting information about life-threatening diseases from their patients?
Ethical Principles and Theories at Issue
The ethical principles at work in this case are nonmaleficence, fidelity, and paternalism. The ethical theories at work, on the other hand, are feminist theory and deontology.
How the Ethical Principles and Theories Conflict
While the principles of nonmaleficence and paternalism appear to support withholding the truth from patients in certain circumstances, the principle of fidelity flatly opposes such a course of action. Nonmaleficence, according to the American Nurses Association (ANA, 2014), concerns the avoidance of hurt or harm and advocates for behaviors that do not cause others distress. On this basis, telling patients the full truth about their illness or other distressing news could produce significant distress and mental anguish. For instance, a patient in the ICU following an accident might ask about the whereabouts of those who were traveling with them. Informing that patient that someone close to them — such as their child — perished in the accident would appear unwise under these circumstances. As per the principle of nonmaleficence, telling the patient the unvarnished truth at that point could cause great harm and might even compromise the recovery process.
When it comes to the principle of paternalism, ANA (2014) points out that some of the typical decisions healthcare professionals make concern the patient's diagnosis, therapy, and prognosis. As ANA states, "based upon the health care professional's belief about what is in the best interests of the patient, he/she chooses to reveal or withhold patient information in these three important areas" (ANA, 2014). According to this principle, telling the patient the full truth in scenarios such as the one above may not be in the patient's best interests. A nurse might therefore be compelled to withhold information about the death of a loved one until the patient has recovered sufficiently and is in a proper state of mind to receive such news.
Fidelity, according to ANA (2014), "requires loyalty, fairness, truthfulness, advocacy, and dedication" to the patients one is assigned to care for. By lying to a patient — regardless of the reason — a nurse goes against the spirit of this principle.
Regarding the ethical theories at work, deontology judges the morality of an action on the basis of its adherence to rules, while feminist ethics fronts ethical relativism (ANA, 2014). The feminist theory, therefore, "requires examination of the context of the situation in order to come to a moral conclusion" (ANA, 2014). Under this framework, the critical or fragile state of a patient's health would warrant that any information likely to further worsen that health be withheld. The deontological moral system, by contrast, would demand that the patient be told the truth at all times, since truthfulness is a moral duty of a nurse.
References
American Nurses Association (ANA). (2014). Short definitions of ethical principles and theories: Familiar words, what do they mean?
Corner, J., & Bailey, C. D. (Eds.). (2009). Cancer nursing: Care in context (2nd ed.). John Wiley & Sons.
Williams, A. (2013). Dementia sufferers told white lies to keep them happy: Nurses and psychiatrists admit 'therapeutic lying' to confused patients. Daily Mail.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.