This paper surveys four major frameworks in personality psychology: trait and factor theories as developed by Raymond Cattell and Hans Eysenck, Allport's dispositional theory distinguishing cardinal, central, and secondary dispositions, Bandura's social cognitive theory of personality development through attention, retention, reproduction, and motivation, and Bandura's account of dysfunctional behavior as a product of maladaptive environmental responses. Together, these theories illustrate how personality researchers have moved from broad trait taxonomies to dynamic, reciprocal models that account for both individual dispositions and environmental influences.
Personality trait and factor theories have been developed as a means of identifying common elements within the personalities of different people — indeed, across the entire population. Within any given group, there are common threads of experience, similar nurturing, and even shared genetics, yet the personality of each member is a unique construction of individual elements working together. Among those who have produced significant work in this area are Raymond Cattell and Hans Eysenck. Each used scientific factor analysis to identify common traits, or permanent dispositions, of people. Cattell identified a large number of personality traits, whereas Eysenck's research extracted only three general factors (McGraw-Hill, 2002). Like Freud, who identified the id, ego, and superego as measurements of the personal mind, will, and emotion, the categories identified by these researchers give us the ability to understand the unique functions of personality, emotions, and desires.
Gordon Allport distinguished between common traits held within a group and personal dispositions, which are individual. He believed that individuals have overlapping levels of personality, which included:
Allport believed that these dispositions were motivated by individual motivational characteristics. He identified three motivations that drove people to act according to their individual dispositions:
Bandura was dissatisfied with what he called simplistic perspectives on personality, and developed a framework based on the assumption that a person's personality and their environment determine and influence each other. His work began with adolescents, from which he drew four steps in the process that models and shapes personal character:
Bandura's social cognitive approach is explored in depth in his foundational work on social learning theory, which underpins much of contemporary personality and developmental psychology.
"Maladaptive responses to environmental disappointments"
Together, these theories reflect an evolution in how psychologists understand personality — from identifying stable traits and dispositions to recognizing the dynamic, reciprocal relationship between a person and their environment. Cattell and Eysenck provided a broad taxonomic foundation; Allport refined that foundation by emphasizing the individuality of personal dispositions; and Bandura shifted the focus entirely toward the interactive processes through which personality is shaped and, at times, distorted. Understanding these frameworks provides essential grounding for the broader study of personality psychology.
You’re 53% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.