Turkey's Near- and Long-Term Security Threats Analyzed
This paper examines the range of security threats facing Turkey over both a near-term (five-year) and long-term (ten-to-twenty-year) horizon. It begins with the immediate threat posed by the Islamic State (ISIS) and the resulting refugee crisis, before turning to longer-term economic vulnerabilities tied to competing pipeline projects — including the BTC, Nabucco-West, and the Iran-Iraq-Syria Friendship Pipeline. The paper also addresses Turkey's complex political relationships with Armenia, Azerbaijan, Russia, and the United States, as well as the nuclear safety risk posed by the Metsamor reactor in Armenia. Throughout, the analysis highlights Turkey's precarious position as a NATO member caught between Western alliances and an increasingly assertive Russia.
- Introduction: Turkey's Geopolitical Position: Turkey's regional context and security overview
- The Near-Term Threat: ISIS and Regional Instability: ISIS violence, refugees, and border instability
- Turkey's Diplomatic Balancing Act with the U.S. and Israel: Erdogan, U.S. partnerships, and Israeli tensions
- Long-Term Economic Threats: Pipelines and Energy Politics: BTC pipeline competition and Syrian economic deals
- Russia, NATO, and the Shifting Balance of Power: Gazprom, BRICS, and Turkey's alliance dilemma
- Social and Political Threats: Armenia, Azerbaijan, and Nuclear Risk: Kurdish pressure, Nagorno-Karabakh, Metsamor reactor
- Conclusion: Navigating an Uncertain Future: Summary of threats and Turkey's strategic choices
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper organizes its argument along a clear temporal framework — near-term versus long-term threats — giving the reader an intuitive structure for processing a wide range of geopolitical material.
- It integrates economic analysis (pipeline competition, energy revenues) with political and military threats, demonstrating that Turkey's security cannot be understood through a single lens.
- The paper draws concrete connections between seemingly separate issues — for example, linking Turkey's rift with Israel to its dependence on U.S. aid in the fight against ISIS — showing how competing interests compound one another.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates effective use of synthesizing evidence from diverse source types — news reporting, congressional research reports, and commentary — to build a multi-dimensional argument. Rather than treating each threat in isolation, the author consistently traces relationships between threats, showing how economic, political, and military factors interact. This integrative approach is a hallmark of strong policy analysis writing at the undergraduate level.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a geographic and contextual overview of Turkey's position, then moves chronologically from the most immediate threat (ISIS) outward to longer-term structural concerns (pipeline economics, Russia-NATO rivalry, regional diplomacy). Supporting paragraphs use direct quotations to anchor claims, and the conclusion effectively recaps both threat categories while gesturing toward the strategic choices Turkey must make. The reference list follows a recognizable APA format.
Introduction: Turkey's Geopolitical Position
Turkey faces several economic, social, and political threats in both the near (five-year) and long (ten-to-twenty-year) term. Its geopolitical situation in the Middle East makes it particularly sensitive not only to local contexts but to global ones as well. Bordering Georgia to the north, Armenia and Iran to the east, and Syria and Iraq to the south, Turkey has been a neighbor to some of the most controversial courses of action in recent history. It is only natural that its own security should be affected by that of its neighbors, as well as by superpower interests in the region. This paper analyzes the security threats facing Turkey in both the near term and the long term.
The Near-Term Threat: ISIS and Regional Instability
The most immediate near-term security threat is the rise of ISIS — the Islamic State — whose self-appointed caliphate declared a religious war against Shia Muslims in the Iraq and Syria region. An offshoot of Al-Qaeda, these Sunni extremists pose a direct threat to Turkish citizens, a quarter of whom are Shia Muslims. If ISIS were to gain a stronghold in northern Iraq or in Syria, it could also threaten Turkish airspace, which provides over-flight access for the United States for strategic missions in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Because Turkey maintains good relations with the United States and provides a form of sanctuary for establishing regional allies for the Western power, Turkey may face additional pressure given that ISIS has explicitly included the West among its targets. Men, women, and children have been killed by the terrorist group, which had already invaded Mosul in northern Iraq. "There is a park in Mosul," reported Catholic Online (2014), "where they actually beheaded children and put their heads on a stick and have them in the park." Hundreds of thousands of Christians and Muslims fled their homes as the terrorist group entrenched itself in the region. This constitutes a near-term threat to Turkey's security — one that could potentially be addressed in the near term with the assistance of U.S. military power.
Turkey's Diplomatic Balancing Act with the U.S. and Israel
President Obama dispatched bombers to the region to eliminate ISIS capabilities. Obama stated, "We do have a strategic interest in pushing back" ISIS. "We're not going to let them create some caliphate… but we can only do that if we know that we've got partners on the ground who are capable of filling the void" (Frizell, 2014). Turkey's role in confronting ISIS would begin with its president, whether that was Erdogan or a successor. Refugees were expected to pour into Turkey, which had already accepted over a million Syrian refugees fleeing the civil war. This tremendous influx would inevitably affect Turkish politics.
Already, Erdogan had denounced the United States' role in Syria and its detached stance toward the violence in Gaza — which Erdogan likened to a new Holocaust, with Israel acting as a new Nazi state (Seibert, 2014). Turkey's position in the region was therefore a delicate one. Considering that "50 Turkish diplomats and civilians have been held hostage by ISIS" in Mosul since June 2014, the terrorist group's threats were tangible (Seibert, 2014). U.S. aid could be of help, but Turkey's situation was made more complex by the fact that it had placed its relations with Israel on hold following the latter's 2010 attack on a Turkish ship bound for Gaza. Since Israel is a major recipient of U.S. foreign aid, Turkey found itself caught: on one hand, it could not afford to isolate itself from U.S. assistance in the fight against ISIS; on the other, it could not endorse what Erdogan called the rise of a "new Hitler" in Israel (Seibert, 2014).
Long-Term Economic Threats: Pipelines and Energy Politics
A significant long-term threat Turkey faces is economic in nature, centered on the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan (BTC) pipeline, which runs from the Caspian Sea through Azerbaijan and Georgia into Turkey, terminating at Ceyhan on the Mediterranean coast. This pipeline represents an important source of revenue for Turkey. However, it has been threatened by Syrian economic initiatives: "Syria signed off on a $10 billion pipeline deal that breaks the BTC monopoly" (Dawson, 2012). The deal also threatens the Nabucco-West pipeline. A competing pipeline that bypasses both the BTC and the Nabucco-West would undercut Turkey's financial prospects and undermine its national economy.
The Iran-Iraq-Syria pipeline — also called the Friendship Pipeline by those countries, or the Islamic Gas Pipeline — is one such example of this economic threat. The Syrian civil war had thus far disrupted plans for laying the Friendship Pipeline, but if Assad remained in power, plans were likely to continue. The Nabucco-West was not expected to be operational until 2017. Its interested parties were Western, in contrast to the Friendship Pipeline, which had Russian backing. The geopolitical relationship between Russia, Syria, and Iran also warrants consideration when assessing Turkey's long-term economic stability, since Russia was pivoting toward China and strengthening its relationship with Syria throughout the civil war. Russia maintains a port on Syrian soil along the Mediterranean coast, which makes its relationship with Syria all the more strategically important — and the pipeline deal all the more significant, as Russia is one of the world's top exporters of natural gas.
Conclusion: Navigating an Uncertain Future
When considering the long-term threat to its security, Turkey finds itself in a genuinely difficult position. It may be left behind if it refuses to consider an alliance with Russia. On the other hand, it risks alienating the United States — currently the primary external power willing to offer assistance. Yet as U.S. influence in the Middle East deteriorates, given the unresolved situations in Iraq and Afghanistan, a full U.S. withdrawal from the region could be damaging for Turkey. The BTC would be consigned to irrelevance and Turkey's economy might not survive the long-term loss of projected energy revenues. Turkey's military is currently in adequate condition, but should direct conflict arise, Turkey may need to bolster its security by aligning with a power that has significant deals in play — as Russia does with China in East Asia.
In summary, near- and long-term threats to Turkey's security are numerous. There is the rise of ISIS in the region, which represents the latest manifestation of terrorism and must be addressed militarily. The near-term threats from this group include border instability, interior violence, and the strain of refugees seeking asylum — Turkey having already accepted many hundreds of thousands. Long-term threats are embedded in the much larger contest between the United States and Russia, as competition over global energy supplies generates conflict across multiple regions. Those conflicts are currently most visible in Ukraine and Syria. Turkey remains a crucial link between the Middle East and the European Union, and the outcome of that broader contest — including which pipelines are ultimately completed — will shape the nation's future in fundamental ways.
References
Catholic Online. (2014). ISIS begins killing Christians in Mosul. Retrieved from http://www.catholic.org/news/international/middle_east/story.php?id=56481
Dawson, R. (2012). Syrian Super Thread. Anti-Neocons. Retrieved from
Escobar, P. (2011). Playing chess in Eurasia. Asia Times Online. Retrieved from http://www.afgazad.com/Zabanhaye-Eropaei/122211-Playing-Chess-in-Eurasia.pdf
Frizell, S. (2014). President Obama explains why the U.S. is bombing ISIS. Time. Retrieved from
Nichol, J. (2011). Russian political, economic, and security issues and U.S. interests. CRS Report for Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.
Seibert, T. (2014). Erdogan may win the Turkish presidency, but he'll face the ISIS crisis. The Daily Beast. Retrieved from http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2014/08/09/erdogan-may-re-win-the-turkish-presidency-but-he-ll-face-the-isis-crisis.html
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.