UN Women: Feminist Strategies for Global Gender Equality
This paper examines UN Women (UNW) as a feminist organization challenging globalization, tracing its origins from the 2010 United Nations General Assembly resolution that merged four predecessor bodies into a unified entity for gender equality and women's empowerment. The paper explores the historical background of Western feminism from the 1848 Seneca Falls Convention through successive waves of political action, then analyzes UN Women's key strategies—including Gender Budget programs, the CEDAW framework, and the Beijing Platform for Action. It also addresses the obstacles the organization faces, from internal feminist tensions around race and class to deep-seated cultural resistance to women's suffrage and political participation, before making the case for why UN Women qualifies as a genuinely feminist organization.
- Introduction and Origins of UN Women: UN Women's founding and predecessor organizations
- Historical Background of Feminist Political Movements: Suffrage roots and feminist political thresholds
- Strategies of Resistance and Global Programs: Gender Budget, CEDAW, and UN Women strategies
- Key Frameworks and Guiding Principles: Founding principles and long-term equality goals
- Obstacles Facing UN Women and the Feminist Movement: Cultural, racial, and political barriers to equality
- Why UN Women Is a Feminist Organization: Criteria defining UN Women as feminist
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper systematically addresses a structured set of analytical questions—background, strategies, obstacles, and feminist identity—giving the argument a clear, logical progression that is easy to follow.
- It integrates both historical context (Seneca Falls, suffrage movements) and contemporary policy detail (CEDAW, Gender Budget programs) to situate UN Women within a broader feminist tradition.
- The obstacle section is notably balanced, acknowledging internal critiques of feminism—particularly around race and class privilege—alongside external cultural and political resistance.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates organizational analysis applied through a feminist lens, using secondary sources and UN primary documents (Annual Reports, Strategic Plans) to evaluate whether a multilateral institution meets definitional criteria for a feminist organization. This technique moves beyond simple description to engage in normative assessment backed by evidence.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a question-and-answer structure typical of guided academic assignments: it opens with institutional background, moves to historical feminist context, details operational strategies and policy frameworks, catalogues obstacles, and closes with a normative argument for UN Women's feminist identity. Each section builds on the last, with the final section drawing together threads from earlier sections to make a coherent concluding claim.
Introduction and Origins of UN Women
UN Women (UNW) was created in 2010 by the United Nations General Assembly, which simultaneously established the United Nations Entity for Gender Equality and the Empowerment of Women (UNEGEEW). The creation of these two bodies was intended to accelerate the rate at which the UN and its Member States were working toward the empowerment of women and the advancement of gender equality, making this an historic step. The UN itself was undergoing significant change, with a reform agenda directed at unifying mandates and resources in order to achieve a greater collective impact. The overall UN organization combined four separate, older bodies to create UN Women: the United Nations Development Fund for Women (UNIFEM), the Division for the Advancement of Women (DAW), the Office of the Special Adviser on Gender Issues and Advancement of Women (OSAGI), and the International Research and Training Institute for the Advancement of Women (INSTRAW) (About UN Women, n.d.).
Historical Background of Feminist Political Movements
Feminism in the United States can be traced back to 1848 and the Seneca Falls Convention in New York. This was the nation's first convention on women's rights and attracted over 300 attendees. Elizabeth Cady Stanton outlined the natural equality of women in what became the Seneca Falls Declaration, widely regarded as the origin of the suffrage movement (Krolokke, 2006). Many dedicated women worked tirelessly to win the vote for women—among them Anna Howard Shaw, Alice Paul, and Carrie Chapman Catt—but women's suffrage did not become law in the United States until 1920. In its first wave, American feminism employed a wide variety of approaches to resistance and societal intervention, providing inspiration that endures to the present day.
Ideas concerning gender equality and the means to achieve it—collectively known as feminism—belong to a broad social and political movement that first emerged in Western society. The foundation of this movement was the growing recognition that economic, cultural, political, and social contexts in many, if not all, countries devalued women relative to men and placed them in a secondary category at best. Huang (2005) notes that Western feminist societies worked through at least three distinct thresholds of political action in their efforts to transform society and bring about gender equality.
A political movement can range from relatively placid to highly confrontational, varying from sit-in protests and conventional petitioning to violent blockades and revolutionary activities. Organizations often develop in stages through several "thresholds": (1) signing petitions (conventional politics) escalates to unconventional politics; (2) the level of action shifts toward measures such as boycotts or marches ("direct action"); (3) unofficial, legally unauthorized strikes represent the third threshold, in which political action shifts to non-violent yet illegal activity; and (4) once political activity shifts to direct and violent actions against property or persons, it is said to have reached the fourth threshold. When social movements are focused on political system change, they may use confrontation or negotiation, sometimes in forms that are extreme and counter-cultural. By contrast, when social movements are focused on value system change, the strategy is more likely to be expressed in a moderate, sub-cultural form (Huang, 2005).
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.