Urgent Care Centers vs. Emergency Rooms: A Better Choice
This paper argues that patients experiencing non-life-threatening medical issues should choose urgent care centers over emergency rooms. Drawing on healthcare research and industry data, the paper examines how ER overcrowding stems from avoidable non-emergency visits, how urgent care centers fill a critical gap in accessible healthcare, and how shifting patients toward these facilities can reduce costs, improve efficiency, and spur healthy market competition. The paper also considers public education, insurance policy, extended hours, and the cooperative relationship between urgent care centers and primary care physicians as key factors in reforming how Americans access healthcare.
- Introduction: The Case for Urgent Care: Thesis: use urgent care for non-emergency needs
- ER Overcrowding and Avoidable Visits: Non-emergency ER use causes systemic overcrowding
- Urgent Care as a Viable Alternative: Urgent care fills gap left by ERs and primary care
- Changing Perceptions and Driving Policy: Education and policy needed to shift patient behavior
- Competition, Extended Hours, and Market Transformation: Urgent care drives competition and improves access
- Conclusion: Efficiency and Accessibility: Urgent care signals overdue reform in healthcare
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Uses a mix of quantitative data (e.g., avoidable ER visit percentages, $4.4 billion cost-savings estimate) and qualitative evidence (direct quotes from practitioners and industry experts) to build a well-rounded argument.
- Employs an accessible analogy—the ice cream parlor and convenience store—to make the systemic problem immediately understandable to a general audience.
- Addresses counterarguments and stakeholder tensions (e.g., doctor criticism of Anthem Blue Cross, concerns about deteriorating doctor-patient relationships) before rebutting them, demonstrating balanced reasoning.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper effectively integrates multiple source types—peer-reviewed journal articles, industry publications, and news media—to support a policy-oriented argument. Each claim is anchored to a citation, and the author synthesizes sources rather than simply stringing quotations together, connecting each piece of evidence back to the central thesis about redirecting non-emergency patients to urgent care.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with a problem statement and thesis, then builds through cause-and-effect analysis (ER overcrowding), solution introduction (urgent care centers), behavioral and policy barriers, and market dynamics. It concludes with a forward-looking summary. The argument flows logically from problem to solution to systemic implications, with each body section building on the last.
Introduction: The Case for Urgent Care
For many people who have a pressing health issue or concern that does not arise during regular office hours, the emergency room is their only alternative. An emergency room doctor cannot turn patients away, and for the uninsured the ER is often the primary place where health problems are addressed—including issues that are not true emergencies. The advent of the urgent care center has changed all that. Research suggests that patients should utilize urgent care clinics rather than emergency rooms for non-life-threatening medical issues because they are often treated faster, utilize fewer resources, and result in lower out-of-pocket expenses.
ER Overcrowding and Avoidable Visits
Finding patient-accessible care has long been a problem. For example, a worker who must be at work by 8 a.m.—before most doctors' offices open—might go to the emergency room to have an ear infection treated. This is precisely how many people view the ER, and it is one of the key drivers of overloading, overcrowding, and long wait times. As one research brief notes:
"A large portion of ED visits fall into the category of avoidable use resulting from patients seeking non-urgent care or ED care for conditions that could have been treated and/or prevented by prior primary care. Use of the ED for non-urgent (or non-emergency) visits grew from 9.7 percent of all ED visits in 1997 to over 12 percent in 2006…Estimates of total avoidable ED use range as high as 56 percent of all visits" (NEHI, 2010).
This data clearly suggests that there is a definitive way to make ERs across the nation more efficient and more capable of serving the populations they are designed for. The problem is relatively easy to diagnose: ERs are being systematically misused. Consider a useful analogy—a long line at an ice cream parlor because it is the only nearby business selling bottled water and juice. Once a convenience store opens that is stocked with the necessary beverages, the line at the ice cream parlor immediately disappears. The same logic applies to emergency rooms and urgent care centers.
Urgent Care as a Viable Alternative
While many experts hold mixed opinions about the rapid growth of urgent care centers, these facilities do offer a viable alternative to the emergency room. Urgent care centers have emerged to fill a gaping, long-unmet need in professional medicine. They offer patients health assistance when waiting for a primary care appointment—or even waiting in the ER—is not a reasonable option. As Weinick, Burns, and Mehrotra (2010) explain:
"Urgent care centers and retail clinics have emerged as alternatives to the emergency department for nonemergency care. We estimate that 13.7–27.1 percent of all emergency department visits could take place at one of these alternative sites, with a potential cost savings of approximately $4.4 billion annually. The primary conditions that could be treated at these sites include minor acute illnesses, strains, and fractures."
In practical terms, an urgent care center can absorb much of the patient load that bogs down an ER waiting room. A urinary tract infection, for instance, is not an emergency—but developing one late on a Friday night and being forced to endure it until Monday, when a primary care physician is available, can feel unbearable. Making a patient wait three hours in an ER waiting room for a condition like this is neither fair nor consistent with the standard of care expected in a developed nation.
For many people, the emergence of the urgent care center has been a genuine relief. While urgent care visits are not free, they are affordable for many patients and serve as a safety net when doctors' offices are closed and ER wait times are unmanageable. However, the usefulness of urgent care centers does not guarantee that everyone uses them or understands their purpose. As Saravas (2012) notes, it takes deliberate effort to change employee perceptions of urgent care in order to minimize inappropriate ER usage. When ERs are used indiscriminately, it places a direct strain on the healthcare system (Saravas, 2012). Transforming public perceptions of urgent care centers is therefore a necessary step toward lowering overall healthcare costs.
Conclusion: Efficiency and Accessibility
Urgent care centers represent efficiency and accessibility—two major gaps that existed in the previous model. The previous model can largely be described as a system that benefited doctors and insurance companies rather than patients, which is a striking failure given that patients are the ones funding the entire enterprise. Urgent care centers represent the beginning of meaningful change, however gradual, for a system that has long been in need of reform. As these facilities become more integrated into the broader healthcare delivery landscape, both patients and providers stand to benefit from a more responsive, competitive, and accessible system of care.
References
Adesara, R., Spencer, J., & Bost, J. (2011). Office-based patient education decreases non-emergent emergency department visits. Journal of Medical Practice Management, 131–135.
Ashton, L. (2017, July). Urgent care: A growing healthcare landscape. Nursing, 47(7), 21–24.
Ayers, A. A. (2018, June 20). How urgent care cultivates competition in healthcare. Journal of Urgent Care Medicine. Retrieved from https://www.jucm.com/urgent-care-cultivates-competition-healthcare/
Bonura, C. (2000, November 20). 'Urgent' care centers cut ER waits. New Orleans Citybusiness, 4–5.
Cheney, C. (2015, November). The new urgent care wave. HealthLeaders, 38–40.
Do, Y. (2014, October 27). The impact of an emergency room fee increase on the composition of patients visiting emergency departments. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, 2014(20), 309–316.
Fogarty, T. (2011, October 15). Reining in unnecessary emergency room costs—for individuals and employers. Managed Care Outlook, 24(20), 2–5.
Fox, M. (2017, June 5). Is this new emergency room policy bad medicine? Retrieved from https://www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/major-insurance-company-s-payment-decision-angers-er-doctors-n767766
Frederick, J. (2013, March 11). Insurers turn to retail, urgent care clinics to keep members out of emergency rooms. Drug Store News, 32–37.
Kulin, J. (2015, April 27). The cooperative model for urgent care and primary care. Retrieved from https://www.athenahealth.com/blog/2015/04/27/the-cooperative-model-for-urgent-care-and-primary-care
NEHI. (2010, March). A matter of urgency: Reducing emergency department overuse. Retrieved from https://www.nehi.net/writable/publication_files/file/nehi_ed_overuse_issue_brief_032610finaledits.pdf
Saravas, P. (2012, January 1). Perception is reality: Six keys to changing employee perceptions of urgent care and reducing inappropriate ER utilization. Managed Care Outlook, 25(1), 2–7.
Weinick, R., Burns, R. M., & Mehrotra, A. (2010). Many emergency department visits could be managed at urgent care centers and retail clinics. Health Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/abs/10.1377/hlthaff.2009.0748
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.