The Rise of the Novel: Watt on Defoe, Richardson & Fielding
This paper offers a critical review of Ian Watt's influential 1957 study, The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding. The review examines Watt's central arguments: that Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding invented the novel as a distinctly modern literary form rooted in realism; that social changes in 18th-century England—including increased leisure time and shifting class dynamics—fueled the novel's rise in popularity; and that the treatment of love in Richardson's Pamela marked a turning point in the genre. The paper also engages counterarguments from other critics who question the narrowness of Watt's definition, ultimately offering a measured assessment of the book's enduring significance.
- Introduction: Watt's Central Claim: Watt argues social change shaped the 18th-century novel
- Realism and the Definition of the Novel: Watt's narrow definition of realism and its critics
- Social Conditions and the Reading Public: How leisure time fueled novel reading
- Class, Leisure, and Access to Reading: Class distinctions in who could read novels
- Love, Marriage, and the New Genre: Richardson's realistic treatment of love in Pamela
- The Quality of Later 18th-Century Fiction: Watt's skepticism about late-century novel quality
- Conclusion: Evaluating Watt's Legacy: A balanced verdict on Watt's enduring contribution
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper balances summary and critique effectively, presenting Watt's arguments fairly before introducing counterpoints from other critics and the reviewer's own reasoned disagreements.
- It grounds abstract literary theory in concrete textual examples — such as Defoe's seven-page description of bread-baking and Richardson's realistic portrayal of love — making the analysis accessible and specific.
- The conclusion is honest about the reviewer's ambivalence, acknowledging Watt's exhaustive scholarship while pointing to its limitations, which demonstrates critical maturity.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates evaluative summary: it does not merely restate Watt's arguments but tests each one against outside critical opinion and the reviewer's own reading experience. Quoting Watt directly, then posing follow-up questions the book leaves unanswered, is an effective way to show engagement with a source rather than passive acceptance of it.
Structure breakdown
The paper moves logically through Watt's major arguments in roughly the same order they appear in the source book: definition of the novel, social context, class and readership, the treatment of love, and the quality of late-century fiction. Each section introduces a Watt claim, supports it with a direct quotation, and then offers the reviewer's response or a counterpoint from another critic. A brief conclusion synthesizes the overall evaluation.
Introduction: Watt's Central Claim
"The novel is in nothing so characteristic of our culture as in the way that it reflects this characteristic orientation of modern thought" (Watt 22). This is how Ian Watt defines the novel he discusses and analyzes in his landmark study. Watt wrote this book in 1957, after years of studying the 18th-century novel. He argues that the writing of the three authors he examines — Daniel Defoe, Samuel Richardson, and Henry Fielding — was shaped by broad changes in their society. To make his point, he writes: "Defoe, Richardson and Fielding were no doubt affected by the changes in the reading public of their time; but their works are surely more profoundly conditioned by the new climate of social and moral experience which they and their eighteenth-century readers shared" (Watt 7).
This is an interesting claim, but it prompts the reader to wonder why later and arguably more dramatic "social and moral experiences" did not influence the novel even more. What about the period after the Industrial Revolution, which changed the world forever? Were later novels grittier and even more realistic than those of the 18th century? Or did fiction revert to romanticism during the Victorian era? Watt does not address these questions, but the book invites further research into what other critics have said about later influences on novel writing.
Works Cited
Johnson, P.A. "The Story of Genre." University. 2001.
Just, D. "Good Books, Bad Books." Personal Web Page. 25 Feb. 1999.
Watt, I.P. The Rise of the Novel: Studies in Defoe, Richardson, and Fielding. 1st ed. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1957.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.