Wells Fargo Scandal: Business Ethics and Corporate Governance
This paper examines the Wells Fargo corporate scandal that came to light in 2016, in which employees opened approximately 1.5 million fraudulent bank accounts and issued over 500,000 unauthorized credit cards to meet aggressive sales quotas. The paper reviews the company's background, the essential details of the misconduct, and the resulting regulatory fines and class action settlements exceeding $342 million. It then analyzes failures in corporate governance and ethical culture, particularly the board of directors' repeated inaction despite early warning signs. The paper also evaluates whether ethical policies alone can prevent such misconduct and concludes with a discussion of how leadership committed to positive social change might have directed company resources differently.
- Introduction: Paper scope, purpose, and section preview
- Overview of Wells Fargo: Company history, segments, and pre-scandal reputation
- The Scandal: Essential Details and Societal Impact: Fake accounts, fines, settlements, and broader harm
- Failures in Corporate Governance and Ethical Culture: Board inaction, red flags ignored, leadership accountability
- Can Ethical Policy Prevent Future Misconduct?: Limits of written policies and enforcement mechanisms
- Leading Differently: Choices for Positive Social Change: Alternative leadership approaches and community banking
- Conclusion: Key findings on ethics, governance, and reform needs
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds its ethical analysis in specific, documented facts — exact dollar amounts, time periods, and regulatory outcomes — giving the argument a concrete foundation rather than relying on vague generalizations.
- Moves logically from description to analysis to prescription, walking the reader from what happened, to why it happened, to what could or should have been done differently.
- Acknowledges the limits of its own prescriptions honestly, conceding that ethical policies alone are insufficient without regulatory enforcement and personal executive accountability.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates the use of a single case study as a lens for broader ethical and governance principles. By anchoring every analytical point to cited evidence from Restrepo (2017/2019), Witman (2018), and Haugh (2018), the author avoids unsupported opinion while building a multi-source argument about systemic corporate governance failure. This technique — case-grounded argumentation with scholarly citation — is a standard approach in applied business ethics writing.
Structure breakdown
The paper follows a question-and-answer organizational format, using each section heading as a guiding question (e.g., "Where do you see failures in corporate governance?"). This structure — common in case-study response papers — ensures the paper addresses every analytical dimension systematically. The introduction previews all sections, the body sections each resolve one question, and the conclusion synthesizes key findings. The final reflective section ("What would you have done differently?") adds a normative, first-person dimension that distinguishes this from a purely descriptive case analysis.
Introduction
In early 2016, Wells Fargo was formally implicated in a corporate scandal that reflected the failure of its officers and directors to fulfill their duties and responsibilities. The purpose of this paper is to analyze the ethical scandal involving Wells Fargo and to evaluate its business practices within the context of positive social change. To that end, the paper presents the essential details of the event, its proximate causes, and its negative impact on society. An examination of the causes of the crisis is followed by a discussion of what steps might have prevented the scandal and a description of what choices a leader committed to positive social change might have made instead. Finally, the paper provides a summary of key research findings in the conclusion.
Overview of Wells Fargo
Founded in March 1852 by Henry Wells and William G. Fargo and currently headquartered in San Francisco, Wells Fargo (hereinafter alternatively "the company") competes in the financial services sector, providing a wide range of banking and other consumer finance services (About Wells Fargo, 2021). At present, the company operates the following business segments:
Community Banking: This segment provides an array of financial products and services, including credit and debit cards, checking and savings accounts, and loans for automobiles, students, and small businesses.
Wholesale Banking: This unit offers expert guidance on potential financial solutions for businesses in the United States and abroad.
Wealth & Investment Management: This unit provides individualized wealth management and investment services, as well as various retirement services and products, to clients in the United States.
Other: This unit also offers wealth, investment, and management services, delivered through community banking distribution channels (Wells Fargo profile, 2021).
The company's hard-won reputation for responsible business practices and stewardship of its clients' financial resources took a major hit in early 2016 when Wells Fargo was implicated in a significant financial scandal that continues to adversely affect its operations today.
The Scandal: Essential Details and Societal Impact
After more than a century and a half of providing high-quality financial products and services to a global clientele — and successfully surviving the subprime mortgage crisis of 2007 to 2009 — Wells Fargo was the third-largest bank in the United States, with a solid reputation by year-end 2015 (Witman, 2018). A case study on the company reports that, "By the end of 2015, Wells Fargo was the most trusted bank in the world, and the bank's reputation for strategic discipline led pundits to list Wells Fargo as a bank that would stand the test of time" (Corporate governance and ethics, p. 233).
The event that led to this precipitous decline in reputation involved Wells Fargo employees creating approximately 1.5 million fake bank accounts and issuing more than half a million consumer credit cards to clients who had not requested them (Restrepo, 2017). One Wells Fargo executive conceded that the company simply told its clients "they would be getting a credit card" (as cited in Restrepo, 2017, p. 1690).
The company's admission of such widespread wrongdoing had severe consequences, including a $185 million fine levied by the federal government and an additional $142 million used to settle a nationwide class action lawsuit brought by affected clients. Although the precise internal costs of setting up and administering the fraudulent accounts remain unknown, the class action suit revealed that Wells Fargo had extracted more than $2.5 million in fees and fines from clients for these unauthorized accounts and credit cards (Restrepo, 2017).
While regulators, clients, and banking sector analysts were left questioning how this ethical fiasco could have occurred, the facts that emerged made clear that a major failure in corporate governance was primarily responsible. Although $2.5 million may seem like modest corporate chump change for a global financial services company, the negative impact extended to American society and beyond. As Restrepo (2019) notes, "Conscious disregard of their duties by directors and officers affects not only the company itself, but also its consumers and potentially the larger economy" (p. 1692).
Failures in Corporate Governance and Ethical Culture
During the period from 2011 to 2015, an incentive program was implemented at the company that lacked the requisite corporate governance oversight to ensure it was administered appropriately and legally. More troubling still, some industry analysts believe this lack of oversight actually started well before the incentive program produced the scandal described above. According to Restrepo (2017), during the five-year period from 2011 to 2015, "Wells Fargo's demanding corporate culture and sales practices pushed employees to open these fake accounts without customer authorization in order to meet high sales quotas. In fact, there is evidence that these practices reached as far back as 2002, and possibly even earlier" (p. 1599).
While there was plenty of blame to go around, there is a general consensus that this profound failure in the company's ethical culture and climate was directly attributable to its top leadership. Although it is impossible to accurately discern the thought processes of the company's executives and board of directors, most authorities agree that the primary cause of the failure was simple greed. The top leadership team at Wells Fargo was informed repeatedly by whistleblowers and others who recognized the widespread wrongdoing, yet nothing was done in response. As Restrepo (2017) points out, "The Wells Fargo Board of Directors received consistent warning signs, or 'red flags,' of such practices as early as 2005, but failed to act, allowing the fraud to escalate" (p. 1601).
One of the more unsettling findings to emerge from analysis of this scandal was the harsh reality that there is little that can be done when unethical business practices are not only ignored by a company's top leadership but tacitly encouraged.
Conclusion
The research showed that between 2011 and 2015, an incentive program was implemented at Wells Fargo that encouraged employees to open as many new accounts as possible. In response, employees opened thousands of fraudulent accounts and issued unauthorized credit cards to clients, resulting in more than $342 million in fines and class action lawsuit settlements. Although the company had an ethical policy in place during these events, it did nothing to prevent their occurrence. Some analysts argue that no ethical policy can prevent the type of misconduct that occurred at Wells Fargo without more stringent government oversight and laws that hold executives personally accountable for ethical failures.
References
About Wells Fargo. (2021). Wells Fargo. Retrieved from https://www.wellsfargo.com/about/corporate/history/
Chapter 13: Corporate governance and ethics.
Haugh, T. (2018). The power few of corporate compliance. Georgia Law Review, 53(1), 129–195.
Restrepo, C. A. (2019). The need for increased possibility of director liability: Refusal to dismiss in Re Wells Fargo & Co. shareholder derivative litigation, a step in the right direction. Boston College Law Review, 60(6), 1689–1730.
Wells Fargo profile. (2021). CNN Business. Retrieved from https://money.cnn.com/quote/profile/profile.html?symb=WFC
Witman, P. D. (2018). Teaching case "What gets measured, gets managed": The Wells Fargo account opening scandal. Journal of Information Systems Education, 29(3), 131–138.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.