This paper examines the ethics and business logic of outsourcing through the hypothetical Electrocorp case study, originally developed by Karen Musalo of the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics. Drawing on free trade theory — including Russell Roberts's comparative advantage argument — the paper evaluates whether Electrocorp should relocate its manufacturing operations to Mexico, the Philippines, or South Africa. Each destination is assessed on wages, government stability, environmental regulations, and worker conditions. The analysis concludes that despite short-term cost savings, outsourcing to any of the three countries imposes unacceptable ethical costs and long-term business risks, making continued domestic operation the more sound strategic and moral choice.
The paper demonstrates effective cost-benefit analysis applied to a business ethics scenario. Rather than dismissing outsourcing outright, the author engages each destination on its own merits before systematically dismantling the case for relocation. The use of secondary sources — an ethics researcher, an outsourcing industry advocate, and a free trade economist — shows how to synthesize competing perspectives into a coherent argument.
The paper opens with a theoretical framing drawn from Russell Roberts's comparative advantage model, then introduces the Electrocorp scenario. The body proceeds country by country — Mexico, the Philippines, South Africa — applying the same evaluative framework to each. A brief comparative synthesis follows before the conclusion recommends domestic operation on both business and ethical grounds. This funnel structure moves from general theory to specific cases to a final judgment.
In his economic allegory of free trade, The Choice, Russell Roberts argues that free trade is ultimately beneficial to everyone involved: workers, producers, and the general public (2002). According to Roberts, two countries specialize in particular products because one country possesses a comparative advantage over the other. Roberts illustrates this concept using the metaphor of a factory owner and manager who is also an excellent typist but has hired a secretary to handle his typing. When it comes to managing, the executive holds a comparative advantage over his secretary. He is gifted in management while the secretary is not. It is better, therefore, for the manager to specialize in managing while his secretary specializes in typing. This arrangement benefits both parties, as well as everyone who works in the company. For this reason, Roberts argues that free trade is optimal, despite its negative side effects (2002).
Unfortunately, those negative side effects are real, and although they may be overshadowed by the broader benefits of free trade, that does not make them any easier to bear. Outsourcing is one such side effect. Traditionally, many Americans have viewed outsourcing as harmful — displacing hardworking domestic workers in favor of foreign labor. Some also argue that it worsens social conditions abroad, as foreign workers are forced to work for very little pay. Free trade economists, however, counter that outsourcing not only creates more and better jobs for Americans but also improves social conditions in developing countries. Outdated jobs that can be performed in less technologically advanced environments are outsourced, making room for new industries and higher-paying positions in the United States. In the same vein, outsourcing allows residents of developing countries to acquire new skills and become more competitive in the global market. Free trade economists also argue that trade opens borders, allowing developing and politically repressed countries to become more receptive to Western ideals of democracy and freedom. Even so, most agree that a thorough cost-benefit analysis must be performed before any individual company makes the significant decision to outsource its operations.
An excellent illustration of this is the Electrocorp case study, developed by Karen Musalo, director of the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics International Human Rights and Migration Project, who used this hypothetical situation to discuss the ethics and business implications of outsourcing with Stan Raggio, Senior Vice President for Sourcing and Logistics at the Gap. As the CEO of Electrocorp, an electronics company whose operating costs have begun to overshadow profits, a decision must be made about whether to relocate the company to one of three developing countries. By evaluating the business environment in Mexico, the Philippines, South Africa, and the United States, this analysis concludes that while outsourcing may offer short-term financial benefits, the ethical costs are too high a price to pay.
According to the company's outsourcing consultant, relocating to Mexico would solve several of Electrocorp's problems. Most immediately, it would address the firm's wage burden. Currently paying workers $15 an hour — largely as a result of union negotiations — Electrocorp could employ workers in Mexico for approximately $3 a day. The absence of unions and minimum wage laws makes the offer even more attractive to companies struggling to remain profitable. Though the company must account for workers who might leave to seek better wages in the United States, Frank J. Casale notes that Mexico is producing large numbers of educated and bilingual workers. While rapid turnover remains a concern, a shortage of labor would not (2006).
Mexico's governmental environment also makes it an attractive location for U.S. outsourcing (Casale, 2006). The Mexican and American governments have long shared a close relationship in areas of trade, economic aid, and border management. Because Mexico is eager to attract large manufacturing operations, its legal environment is generally accommodating for American companies seeking to outsource. Furthermore, Mexico's environmental regulations are more relaxed than those of the United States — a notable advantage for Electrocorp, given that costly domestic environmental compliance is one of the primary reasons the company is struggling financially. From a purely financial standpoint, relocation to Mexico appears to be a sound business decision.
Casale also argues that Mexico's geographic proximity to the United States is a major asset. Short flights between the two countries make it easier for clients and contractors to visit operations, and they may be more inclined to travel to a neighboring country than to more distant locations such as those in Africa or the Middle East (2006).
Despite these apparent advantages, both business and ethical negatives exist that outweigh the positives. Although the company would no longer face union demands and high wages, it would rely on impoverished workers who are unlikely to match the productivity of healthier, better-nourished employees in the United States. High worker turnover in Mexico — driven by the fact that workers struggle to survive on $3 a day — would further reduce efficiency. By moving to Mexico, Electrocorp would act as an economic enabler, allowing the region to continue paying poverty-level wages rather than refusing to engage with such conditions and thus putting upward pressure on pay.
Mexico's governmental instability also undermines the advantages of its business-friendly legal environment. The country's most recent presidential election, marked by riots and protests that disrupted the democratic process, illustrates the risk of operating in an unstable political environment. Companies doing business in such conditions are vulnerable to sudden regulatory changes, demands for bribes, and unexpected tax levies. Additionally, the ethical implications of exploiting Mexico's lower environmental standards are significant. While cutting corners on environmental compliance may reduce short-term costs, investing in environmentally responsible production methods will prove more competitive in the long run as rivals adopt cleaner technologies.
Finally, even the advantage of Mexico's proximity to the United States is undermined by a specific reputational concern: protest groups have been rallying against a reported rise in birth defects that may be linked to industrial contamination. This negative publicity would deter clients and contractors from visiting, neutralizing the geographic benefit. For both business and ethical reasons, therefore, the incentives of outsourcing to Mexico are outweighed by the drawbacks.
According to the company's consultant, a move to the Philippines might resolve both the business and ethical problems associated with Mexico. In the Philippines, workers can be employed for as little as $1 per day, and children under the age of sixteen can be hired for even less. According to PI Outsource, a Philippines outsourcing advocacy group, the country hosts one of the world's largest outsourcing markets, particularly in the call center industry. With wages so low, companies like Electrocorp could generate substantially higher profits by operating there. The consultant also notes that the Philippine government imposes relatively low environmental standards — roughly comparable to those in Mexico — but without the public relations problems caused by health-related protests.
Despite these apparent advantages, the ethical costs of operating in the Philippines are once again prohibitive. As in Mexico, workers there earn far less than their American counterparts, and an underfed and impoverished workforce — including children — would be unlikely to sustain the production levels that a healthy American workforce could achieve. Employing workers at such rates would again cast Electrocorp in the role of an enabler, perpetuating social injustice rather than working against it. In a country already engaged in early-stage economic reforms that have begun to show results, allowing the continued undervaluation of workers would generate significant negative press — potentially as damaging as the health protests seen in Mexico. For both business and ethical reasons, outsourcing to the Philippines on the basis of its low wages is not strategically defensible.
The same argument applies to the country's lower environmental standards. Operating under a more lenient ecological framework may reduce short-term costs, but failing to develop environmentally responsible production practices will ultimately harm Electrocorp's competitive position. As public attention to environmental issues and sustainable living continues to grow, outsourcing specifically to avoid the costs of greener operations would damage the company's reputation. Although the Philippines possesses a relatively stable government and a growing economy, outsourcing there is inadvisable for both business and ethical reasons.
Esselaar, Jeanne. (2002). The debate over outsourcing in South Africa: Evidence from a case study. Proceedings from Development Policy Research Unit Conference '02. Muldersdrift, Johannesburg.
Roberts, Russell. (2000). The Choice. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Unknown. (n.d.). The future is bright for outsourcing done right. Retrieved June 1, 2008, from http://pioutsource.com
You’re 63% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 2 sections.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.