Women and Entrepreneurship: Myths, Barriers, and Progress in the UK
This paper critically examines the widespread claim that women are worse at entrepreneurship than men, focusing primarily on the United Kingdom. Beginning with a historical and conceptual overview of entrepreneurship, the paper compares male and female participation rates using data from the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, NatWest surveys, and reports from the British Chambers of Commerce. It identifies structural barriers facing women entrepreneurs — including limited access to finance, lack of role models, childcare constraints, and gender discrimination — while also highlighting the growing number of successful women-owned businesses. Case studies such as Anita Roddick and Liliane Bettencourt illustrate women's entrepreneurial capacity. The paper concludes that perceived gender differences in entrepreneurial ability are not grounded in economic logic but are largely the product of social bias and systemic inequality.
- Introduction and Definition of Entrepreneurship: Historical definition and context of entrepreneurship
- Comparison Between Male and Female Entrepreneurs: UK data on gender gap in business start-ups
- Women as Entrepreneurs: Notable Examples: Case studies of successful female entrepreneurs
- Factors Advancing or Retarding Women Entrepreneurs: Structural barriers limiting women's business participation
- Pros, Cons, and Policy Initiatives: Women's strengths in business and government responses
- Conclusion: Gender gap rooted in bias, not innate ability
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Grounds its argument in a diverse range of empirical sources — including the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor, NatWest surveys, and British Chambers of Commerce reports — lending statistical credibility to claims about the gender gap in UK entrepreneurship.
- Balances quantitative data (e.g., start-up rates, turnover forecasts, self-employment figures) with qualitative case studies such as Anita Roddick, making abstract trends concrete and relatable.
- Acknowledges counter-arguments fairly — noting areas where women outperform men in business resilience and financial independence — before returning to the structural barriers thesis.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper uses a refutation structure effectively: it states the popular claim (women are worse entrepreneurs than men), systematically marshals evidence against it, and then identifies the real explanatory variables — social discrimination, financing gaps, and policy failures — rather than innate gender differences. This moves the analysis from description to critical argument.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens by defining entrepreneurship historically and contextually, then pivots to comparative participation data. A middle section reviews notable successful women entrepreneurs before addressing structural barriers in depth. The penultimate section weighs pros and cons and reviews government policy responses. The conclusion synthesizes the evidence to reject the premise that women are inherently less capable entrepreneurs, pointing instead to systemic inequalities as the root cause of observed disparities.
Introduction and Definition of Entrepreneurship
The woman who heads her own company is no longer something exceptional. However, there is still a disparity in the number of entrepreneurs and businesses run and owned by men compared to women in the United Kingdom. A definition of entrepreneurship does not reveal any logical or innate reason for this disparity.
The conceptualization of entrepreneurship is complex and one that evolves with economic development. In the modern business context, it means combining various factors in an innovative manner to generate a dual collaboration between entrepreneur and customer that will result in the creation of wealth. While scholars from diverse disciplines have over time grappled to define the function of entrepreneurship, contemporary economists place the emphasis on a blend of innovation, coordination of productive resources, and persistent formation of new demand for products, production methods, markets, and forms of organization. However, the interpretation of entrepreneurship is relative to a particular economic environment.
The term entrepreneur was first introduced in the early 18th century by the French economist Richard Cantillon. "In his writings he formally defines the entrepreneur as the 'agent who buys means of production at certain prices in order to combine them' into a new product."
While entrepreneurial activities remain traditionally male-dominated, the number of women heading businesses has escalated over recent decades. Technological progress has not only advanced performance in commerce and industry — it has also streamlined domestic work, opening the doors for women to explore independent self-employment outside the home. The most booming business sectors in the UK today include personal services and complementary therapies. According to a study launched by the Yellow Pages Alternative Census, there is "a general trend towards a boom in women-dominated businesses." The report — the first ever study of business growth and decline within key Yellow Pages business classifications over ten years (1992–2002) — reveals that seven out of ten classifications registering the highest increases come from professions catering for beauty and body image, or alternative therapy and stress relief. Between 1992 and 2002, there was a 635% increase in classifications for yoga classes and a 969% increase in the number of nutritionists listed.
Implicit in this definition is the fact that entrepreneurship and business ownership is a means of combating discrimination and gender or class restrictions. The positive role of proprietorship for women relies on the idea that in the capitalist system, members of economically and socially deprived groups can "escape" deprivation through business ownership, which provides opportunities for self-determination through owning and controlling resources, and through an increased ability to flexibly interface work and domestic life (Goffee & Scase, 1983, p. 626).
The social conditions of the 1970s and 1980s made it easier in many respects for women to achieve proprietorship and independence in business. Margaret Thatcher also served as an inspiration to many prospective female entrepreneurs during this time. Her success in politics proved that women could achieve in any field. There are numerous cases of successful female entrepreneurs who have not only improved their own lives but have "made a dramatic impact on the perception of women in society as a whole." As Goffee and Scase put it, "female entrepreneurs have a symbolic importance which implicitly questions popular conceptions of the position of women in society."
Bibliography
130,000 Women Go Solo. [Article online]; available at http://www.ukbi.co.uk/?sid=44&pgid=45&spgid=&pn=1&stid=304&s=; Internet: accessed 1 January 2005.
Ashby, Rebekah. "More than 130,000 women have become their own bosses over the past year, helping to generate £130bn for British business, Industry Minister Jacqui Smith revealed yesterday." The Journal (Newcastle, England), 11 November 2004.
Burns, Helen. "The impact of gender on small business management: preliminary findings of a British study." International Small Business Journal, April 1, 1994.
Britain's businesswomen — the under-funded minority. [Article online]; available at Internet: accessed 1 January 2005.
Cromie, Stanley. "Sara Carter and Peter Rosa, 'The Financing of Male- and Female-owned Businesses', Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, Vol. 10, 1998, pp. 225–241." International Small Business Journal, April 1, 1999.
Deutsch, Sarah. 2000. Women and the City: Gender, Space, and Power in Boston, 1870–1940. New York: Oxford University Press.
Dolinsky, Arthur L., and Richard K. Caputo. 2003. "Health and Female Self-Employment." Journal of Small Business Management 41, no. 3: 233+. Database online. Available from Questia, http://www.questia.com/. Internet. Accessed 5 January 2005.
"Enterprise: Female entrepreneurs are on the rise — report." The Birmingham Post, 9 June 2004.
Burnet, David. "The Supply of Entrepreneurship and Economic Development." [Essay online]; available at Internet: accessed 3 January 2005.
Goodman, Alissa, Paul Johnson, and Steven Webb. 1997. Inequality in the UK. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hamilton, Daphne. "Gender and ownership in UK small firms." Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 22 March 1994.
Lockwood, Nancy. "The Glass Ceiling: Domestic and International Perspectives." HR Magazine, 1 June 2004.
Kolvereid, Lars, Scott Shane, and Paul Westhead. 1993. "Is it Equally Difficult for Female Entrepreneurs to Start Businesses in All Countries?" Journal of Small Business Management 31, no. 4: 42+. Database online. Available from Questia, http://www.questia.com/. Internet. Accessed 5 January 2005.
Maclear, M. "Anita Roddick." [Article online]; available at Internet: accessed 1 January 2005.
Peacock, S. "Women Business Owners Steal a March on the New Economy." [Article online]; available at http://www.womensbusinessresearch.org/pressreleases/2-28-2001/2-28-2001.htm; Internet: accessed 1 January 2005.
"Sharp increase in women-dominated business sectors." Women's Business Network. [Article online]; available at http://www.wbn.org.uk/news/; Internet: accessed 4 January 2005.
"UK recommendations to boost female entrepreneurship." [Article online]; available at http://www.parispwn.net/newsletters/press_review/press_review_06_04.html; Internet: accessed 1 January 2005.
"Women are doing it for themselves says NatWest." Every Woman. [Article online]; available at Internet: accessed 2 January 2005.
"Women at helm." Daily Post (Liverpool, England), 9 June 2004.
"Women entrepreneurs are gathering pace." [Article online]; available at Internet: accessed 2 January 2005.
"Women's Enterprise (UK) News No. 1," 1 March 2002. [Article online]; available at http://64.233.183.104/search?q=cache:5iQ1PQXxM58J:www.prowess.org.uk/pdfs/Issue%201%20March%202002.pdf+women+entrepreneurs++uk&hl=en&start=20; Internet: accessed 2 January 2005.
"Women fight their own battles; Is there a place for feminism in today's business world?" Daily Post (Liverpool, England), 24 November 2004.
Create your account
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.