Workplace Violence Prevention: Annotated Bibliography
This annotated bibliography examines nine scholarly sources addressing workplace violence and security. Each entry is evaluated for its problem statement, study purpose, methodology, participants, variables, findings, conclusions, and relative strengths and weaknesses. The sources span practitioner-focused articles, empirical surveys, and literature reviews, collectively covering topics such as early warning signs of violence, proactive prevention strategies, workplace hostility measurement, de-escalation in nursing settings, applicable state and federal law, the impact of formal administrative policies, employee exposure risk factors, and large-scale workforce safety perceptions. Together, the annotations offer a comprehensive overview of what is known — and what remains methodologically limited — in the field of workplace violence prevention.
- Introduction to Workplace Violence and Security: Overview of annotated bibliography scope and purpose
- Proactive Prevention and Warning Signs: Warning signs and proactive steps to prevent violence
- Workplace Hostility: Definition and Measurement: Defining and measuring workplace hostility empirically
- Legal Frameworks and Policy-Based Prevention: State and federal law and formal administrative policies
- Employee Exposure, Supervisor Roles, and Safety Perceptions: Who is most at risk and how supervisors reduce threats
- Strengths and Limitations Across the Literature: Methodological critique of reviewed sources
- Conclusions and Implications for Practice: Key takeaways for workplace violence prevention practice
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- Each annotation follows a consistent structured format — problem, purpose, methodology, participants, variables, findings, conclusions, and strengths/weaknesses — making cross-source comparison easy for the reader.
- The annotations honestly note methodological limitations (e.g., small sample sizes, non-scientific research designs), which reflects critical thinking rather than uncritical summarization.
- The bibliography covers a range of source types — empirical studies, practitioner articles, and literature reviews — giving the reader a well-rounded view of the field.
Key academic technique demonstrated
This paper demonstrates disciplined critical annotation: rather than simply summarizing each source, the student evaluates each one against standard research criteria (methodology, sampling, validity, reliability) and explicitly identifies strengths and weaknesses. This evaluative stance transforms a bibliography into a genuine scholarly tool for assessing the quality and applicability of existing research.
Structure breakdown
The paper is organized as a series of parallel annotation blocks, each anchored by an APA reference citation. Within each block, fixed section headers guide the reader through the same analytical categories. This parallel structure allows readers to compare sources at a glance and helps the writer maintain analytical consistency. The sources move loosely from conceptual and practitioner-level pieces toward more empirical, large-sample studies, building toward evidence-based conclusions about workplace violence prevention.
Introduction to Workplace Violence and Security
This annotated bibliography examines nine sources addressing workplace violence and security. Each source is analyzed according to the problem it addresses, its purpose, methodology, participants, variables, findings, conclusions, and strengths and weaknesses. Together, these annotations offer a broad overview of the current state of research on workplace violence prevention and security.
Proactive Prevention and Warning Signs
APA Reference: Addressing Workplace Violence: Taking Proactive Steps. (2015). Professional Safety, 60(12), 16–17.
Problem/Issue Addressed: Workplace problems with the potential to result in violence and how to better address workplace violence.
Purpose of Study: None mentioned.
Study Methodology: Non-applicable.
Participants/Sampling Procedure: Non-applicable.
Variables and Reliability/Validity of Measures: Non-applicable.
Findings/Results: Non-applicable.
Conclusions by Researcher: Warning signs of workplace violence include personal issues such as health concerns, financial pressures, mental illness, and family problems, which often ignite violence at the workplace. More obvious signs include reduced productivity, excessive delays, frequently missed deadlines, and changes in work habits. Additional indicators include obsessing about certain topics and constantly talking about them, as well as personality changes that may signal unresolved issues.
Proactive steps to handling workplace violence include: developing a threat or crisis assessment team; training all workers; and conducting a gap analysis to identify any vulnerabilities.
Strengths and Weaknesses:
Strength: The article is founded on reporting by an expert in the field — Carol Fredrickson, a fifteen-year law enforcement veteran and CEO of Violence Free, an international violence prevention consulting firm.
Weakness: The study is not founded on a scientifically acceptable research technique.
APA Reference: Chenier, E. (1998). The workplace: A battleground for violence. Public Personnel Management, 27(4), 557. https://doi-org.mylibrary.wilmu.edu/10.1177/009102609802700409
Problem/Issue Addressed: Workplace violence, including its causes, an analysis of the workplace, areas of violence, crisis management, preventive measures, and the evaluation of preventive programs.
Purpose of Study: Not clearly mentioned.
Study Methodology: Non-applicable.
Participants/Sampling Procedure: Non-applicable.
Variables and Reliability/Validity of Measures: Non-applicable.
Findings/Results: Non-applicable.
Conclusions by Researcher: Violence sensitization in the community will result in the workplace turning into a fortress in the years to come. There will be harsher workplace restrictions and guidelines. Companies and organizations will become increasingly conscious of safety measures and will operate with restraints such as video camera surveillance, electronic sensors, metal detectors, and other sophisticated security equipment. The majority of businesses, regardless of size, will have some form of security already in place or will be considering it. There will also be a rise in the use of crisis team management as a preventive measure.
Given the random nature of violence, all employers should be prepared to handle such situations. With increased downsizing in the labor force, personal frustrations are likely to rise due to stress. Preventative measures should therefore be placed to identify and resolve conflicts among employees. These measures cannot completely eradicate workplace violence; however, with even modest prevention efforts, certain issues could be avoided, and employers might significantly decrease their potential liability from workplace violence. Over time, businesses will also recognize the great need to invest in preventative programs designed to reduce workplace violence.
Strengths and Weaknesses:
Strengths: The paper includes field-level expertise via an interview with an OSHA representative, and is backed by findings from past literature.
Weakness: The paper does not adopt the form of an official, replicable literature review.
Workplace Hostility: Definition and Measurement
APA Reference: Menendez, C. C., Selden, M. P., & Downey, R. G. (2012). Workplace hostility: Defining and measuring the occurrence of hostility in the workforce. Work, 42(1), 93–105. DOI: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1332
Problem/Issue Addressed: Workplace violence or hostility and other related factors.
Purpose of Study: The study aimed to outline a comprehensive concept of workplace violence/hostility, including sub-areas of detrimental workplace behaviors. Main characteristics examined include persistence, intentionality, target perception, organizational or company affiliation, and non-physical nature.
Study Methodology: A pilot study utilizing two surveys.
Participants/Sampling Procedure: Participants included employees (N = 35) and students (N = 42), sampled via a convenience sampling technique.
Variables and Reliability/Validity of Measures: The independent variable was location. The dependent variable consisted of compound "violation" scores (organizational and social) from the Workplace Hostility Inventory (WHI), encompassing 39 behaviors. A specialized tool — the WHI — was utilized and is deemed valid.
Findings/Results: The study proposed three sub-scales linked to perceptions of being subjected to violence or hostility: interference with work, defamation, and segregation. Managers produced higher distress scores on all factors, but only segregation predicted a desire to leave the company. Distress was higher when the offender was a group or a woman. After controlling for emotions and feelings toward managers and co-workers, the WHI was not linked to job fulfillment.
Conclusions by Researcher: The Workplace Hostility Inventory (WHI) was found to be a comprehensive construct representing several perceptions. The WHI is inclusive and international, accounting for overlapping constructs identified in prior research.
Strengths and Weaknesses:
APA Reference: Tenley, C., Bergmar, N. M., & Moore, M. (2019). Facing workplace violence and best practices for prevention. Employee Relations Law Journal, 45(3), 62–66.
Problem/Issue Addressed: Workplace violence and the policies and procedures needed to prevent it.
Purpose of Study: Not clearly mentioned.
Study Methodology: Non-applicable.
Participants/Sampling Procedure: Non-applicable.
Variables and Reliability/Validity of Measures: Non-applicable.
Findings/Results: Non-applicable.
Conclusions by Researcher: Workplace violence may occur for several reasons or for no apparent reason at all. While there are many ways of predicting attacks, preventive measures may prevent or reduce the likelihood of future occurrences. Even after a violent episode, employers should assess the vulnerabilities that, if addressed, might have either stopped the incident from happening or reduced its effects. With effective workplace security procedures and policies in place, employers are better positioned to prevent, respond to, and recover from such incidents.
Strengths and Weaknesses:
APA Reference: DelBel, J. C. (2003). De-escalating workplace aggression. Nursing Management, 34(9), 31–34. https://doi-org.mylibrary.wilmu.edu/10.1097/00006247-200309000-00012
Problem/Issue Addressed: Establishing comprehensive programs of aggression prevention before negative events take place in the nursing workplace.
Purpose of Study: None clearly mentioned.
Study Methodology: Non-applicable.
Participants/Sampling Procedure: Non-applicable.
Variables and Reliability/Validity of Measures: Non-applicable.
Findings/Results: Non-applicable.
Conclusions by Researcher: Professionals in the field offer eight recommendations for managing verbally abusive events and reducing the incidence of such provocation in medical settings:
To provide quality care, nursing staff need to receive the same high standard of treatment they have pledged to give patients. Every staff member has the right to dignity, respect, and courtesy. When behavioral standards are not collectively grounded in these three values, those with the loudest voice will set the lowest standards. More serious issues may emerge from a poor culture that permits minor incidents to pass without corrective action.
Strengths and Weaknesses:
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.