This paper analyzes communication challenges faced by the National Park Service at Yellowstone, focusing on why visitors ignore safety signs and regulations despite clear warnings. Drawing on social influence theory, the paper identifies compliance as the primary mechanism needed to address risky visitor behavior. It proposes a narrative-based communication strategy that incorporates real visitor incident stories into park materials and ranger education. The paper emphasizes the role of persuasion and two critical factors—application of general rules to specific situations and visitor accountability—in effectively conveying safety messages and reducing injuries in the park.
The National Park Service (NPS) is assigned the responsibility of managing national parks, historical properties, national monuments, and other conservancies on behalf of the U.S. federal government. Its primary duties include protection of the parks and their visitors, maintenance, recreation, and marketing of the country's natural resources. However, national park rangers and other employees often encounter various obstacles in their quest for smooth interactions between citizens and nature. This paper examines the specific communication challenges faced by Yellowstone National Park and proposes evidence-based solutions grounded in social psychology.
The main communication challenge facing the NPS with respect to visitors of Yellowstone National Park centers on how to effectively convey the importance of all rules, regulations, notices, and signs placed strategically throughout the park. Despite increasing signage due to numerous injuries, the number of accidents has continued to rise as more visitors stream into the park. For instance, multiple signs surrounded Giantess Geyser, yet a young boy managed to break through the formations and sustained serious burn injuries. Similarly, Engine Walker and his friend Phillip Bradberry skipped ranger interactions and failed to receive required literature on rules and regulations. They subsequently camped in an illegal section and Walker was attacked and killed by a grizzly bear. These incidents reveal a critical gap between the communication of safety rules and visitor comprehension and compliance.
Understanding why visitors ignore safety warnings requires examining theories of social influence. According to Coon and Mitterer (2013), the behavior of individuals in social interactions is influenced by how other people act. The mere presence effect describes the tendency of people to perform simple tasks better when in the presence of others. Conformity describes the tendency to change attitudes, behaviors, and beliefs to fit into a particular group. Compliance, in contrast, describes the act of adhering to rules or carrying out requests offered by other people, even when one may disagree with the idea.
When applied to Yellowstone's situation, compliance is the most relevant social influence mechanism. This is because private needs must sometimes be put aside for public well-being in national parks. Compliance requires individuals to submit to people in authority (Coon & Mitterer, 2013). Yellowstone's management and employees understand what is best for visitors when they establish rules and regulations, and therefore should require all visitors to obey them, regardless of personal preferences or intentions. The challenge is not identifying the appropriate influence mechanism, but rather effectively triggering it despite visitor resistance.
A particularly instructive example illustrates why current communication approaches fail. David Kirwan and his friend Ronald Ratliff were well aware that the hot springs they were admiring were very dangerous. However, when Ratliff's dog jumped into the hot springs, Kirwan decided to dive headfirst into the spring to rescue it, despite warnings from fellow visitors. Kirwan acquired third-degree burns and died the following morning. Notably, rangers found a stack of unopened safety pamphlets and literature in their car. This tragic case demonstrates that warning signs and literature are neither well understood nor internalized by visitors, even when the danger is apparent and written materials are physically present.
To address this communication failure, the NPS should adopt a narrative-based strategy incorporating specific stories into maps, literature, and pamphlets. Every dangerous site on the map should include a documented account of visitors who ignored the rules and signs, what they did, and what happened as a result. The stories should be educative rather than designed to instill fear. A key implementation method is to place these narratives adjacent to the specific rules targeting that dangerous site, with highlighting to catch readers' attention. The stories must be short and precise to communicate the real consequences of disregarding clear regulations.
Rangers should also narrate these stories directly during visitor interactions, which can eliminate the risk of people ignoring written materials altogether. One study investigating why visitors ignore warning signs found that visitors are often lost in the spirit of adventure and lack time to thoroughly review supplied literature, assuming that all rules are the same ones they encounter elsewhere. By highlighting concrete stories of what happened to fellow visitors, people may pause and reflect on specific actions they should avoid so that similar incidents do not befall them. The narrative approach transforms abstract rules into vivid, memorable cautionary tales that engage the visitor's imagination and sense of consequence.
Persuasion is intended to change, reinforce, or adjust the attitudes of others toward a particular situation (Stiff & Mongeau, 2003). When applied to visitor safety communication, persuasion is particularly effective because it targets intentional behavior rather than rote compliance. Persuasive messaging gives visitors a sense of control and directs their attention to message contents and what they may be overlooking. By employing persuasion strategies, the NPS can influence how visitors read warning signs and the actions they subsequently take. Research on human decision-making demonstrates that people are more likely to internalize and act upon messages they feel they have voluntarily accepted, rather than those imposed through authority alone.
"Two critical factors beyond message attention"
Although national parks express the beauty of nature to citizens, the NPS faces a significant challenge in keeping parks and their resources safe while educating the public about protective measures for themselves and the natural environment. Although a variety of safety procedures, literature, and rules have been provided, visitors rarely take time to understand and implement them. The NPS should apply strategic communication approaches to reinforce compliance from the public. One such strategy is to incorporate accounts of experiences other visitors underwent due to poor judgments and disregard for established rules. Persuasion is an effective communication tool that can attract readers' attention to message contents. By combining narrative-based messaging, persuasion principles, and an emphasis on visitor accountability and rule application, the NPS can create a more comprehensive and effective safety communication system that protects both visitors and the natural resources entrusted to its care.
You’re 82% through this paper. Sign up to read the remaining 1 section.
Sign Up Now — Instant Access Already a member? Log inAlways verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.