Yogurt Consumption and Colorectal Cancer Risk Reduction
This paper examines the relationship between yogurt consumption and colorectal cancer risk, drawing on a prospective cohort study of over 45,000 Italian participants from the EPIC study (Pala et al., 2011). The paper first establishes that colorectal cancer is strongly influenced by lifestyle and dietary factors, then reviews the role of gut microflora in protecting the colon from inflammation and pathogenic bacteria. It discusses how probiotics modulate immune responses and considers the specific protective mechanisms that live-culture yogurt may offer. The study results indicate a 35–38% reduction in colorectal cancer risk among yogurt consumers, with men showing greater benefit than women. The paper concludes by identifying key limitations, including the inability to separate the effects of milk from active probiotic cultures.
- Introduction: Colorectal Cancer and Lifestyle Risk: Epidemiology and lifestyle contributors to colorectal cancer
- The Role of Gut Microflora: Gut bacteria, immunity, and colon protection
- Probiotics and Colorectal Cancer Risk: Yogurt and live cultures as cancer prevention
- Methods: EPIC cohort study design and variables
- Outcome: Hazard ratios and cancer diagnosis results
- Summary and Critical Evaluation: Findings, limitations, and future research needs
✍️ How to write this paper — guide, tools & examples ▾
What makes this paper effective
- The paper systematically builds its argument from broad epidemiological context to specific molecular mechanisms before presenting the study under review, giving readers the scientific foundation needed to interpret the results.
- The critical evaluation section goes beyond simply reporting findings — it identifies genuine methodological gaps, such as the failure to control for milk as a confounding variable, demonstrating analytical depth.
- The use of hazard ratios across three statistical models with increasing covariate control adds rigor and transparency to the discussion of yogurt's protective effect.
Key academic technique demonstrated
The paper demonstrates strong use of contextual literature review as a scaffolding technique. Before presenting the focal study, the author synthesizes evidence on gut microbiome function, probiotic immune modulation, and the inflammation-cancer link. This positions the Pala et al. (2011) findings within a plausible biological mechanism rather than presenting them as isolated statistics.
Structure breakdown
The paper opens with an epidemiological overview of colorectal cancer, proceeds to a mechanistic review of gut microflora and probiotic research, then presents the methods and outcomes of the Pala et al. (2011) cohort study in structured subsections. It concludes with a substantive summary that both interprets the findings and critiques the study's limitations, including confounding variables, geographic diversity of subjects, and the absence of age-stratified results.
Introduction: Colorectal Cancer and Lifestyle Risk
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the world, with over a million people developing the disease each year (reviewed by Touvier et al., 2011; Aune et al., 2011; Pala et al., 2011; van Duijnhoven et al., 2009). The worldwide distribution of this disease is uneven, with developed economies such as North America and Western Europe generally having the highest prevalence rates. This fact lends significant support to the theory that the disease is primarily caused by lifestyle choices. Americans, for example, have one of the highest prevalence rates in the world, with a lifetime disease risk of 1 in 20 (National Cancer Institute [NCI], 2011). For the general population, the chance of dying from colorectal cancer is only 0.02%, but once diagnosed, the risk of death increases dramatically. The median age at first diagnosis is 70, and the chance of survival depends on several factors, including the stage of disease. In terms of age, survival reaches its lowest point (70%) between the ages of 75 and 84.
Genetics plays a small role in determining colorectal cancer risk, so a large number of studies have focused on risk contributions from environmental factors. In a large cohort study of middle-aged men, it was found that up to 71% of colorectal cancer risk can be attributed to lifestyle choices (Platz et al., 2000). This study examined the relative contributions of obesity, physical inactivity, alcohol consumption, previous smoking experience, red meat consumption, and folic acid dietary supplementation. Fruit and vegetable consumption (van Duijnhoven et al., 2009), vitamin D dietary supplementation, and dairy products (Aune et al., 2011) were also found to lower colorectal cancer risk. What we eat and drink therefore significantly determines our risk of developing cancer of the colon.
References
Aune, D., Lau, R., Chan, D.S.M., Vieira, R., Greenwood, D.C., Kampman, E., and Norat, T. (2011). Dairy products and colorectal cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Annals of Oncology, published online ahead of print May 26.
Baroja, M. L., Kirjavainen, P.V., Hekmat, S., and Reid, G. (2007). Anti-inflammatory effects of probiotic yogurt in inflammatory bowel disease patients. Clinical and Experimental Immunology, 149, 470–479.
Bernstein, C. N. (2010). Epidemiologic clues to inflammatory bowel disease. Current Gastroenterology Reports, 12, 495–501.
Gianotti, L., Morelli, L., Galbiati, F., Rocchetti, S., Coppola, S., Beneduce, A., . . . Braga, M. (2010). A randomized double-blind trial on perioperative administration of probiotics in colorectal cancer patients. World Journal of Gastroenterology, 16(2), 167–175.
Gobbato, N., Rachid, M., and Perdigon, G. (2008). Anti-inflammatory effect of yoghurt in an experimental inflammatory bowel disease in mouse. Journal of Dairy Research, 75, 497–504.
National Cancer Institute. (2011). SEER stat fact sheets: Colon and rectum. Retrieved June 20, 2011, from https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html
Pala, V., Sieri, S., Berrino, F., Vineis, P., Sacerdote, C., Palli, D., . . . Krogh, V. (2011). Yogurt consumption and risk of colorectal cancer in the Italian EPIC cohort. International Journal of Cancer, published online ahead of print May 23.
Platz, E. A., Willett, W. C., Colditz, G. A., Rimm, E. B., Spiegelman, D., and Giovannucci, E. (2000). Proportion of colon cancer risk that might be preventable in a cohort of middle-aged U.S. men. Cancer Causes and Control, 11, 579–588.
Soderlund, S., Granath, F., Brostrom, O., Karlen, P., Lofberg, R., Ekbom, A., and Askling, J. (2010). Inflammatory bowel disease confers a lower risk of colorectal cancer to females than to males. Gastroenterology, 138, 1697–1703.
Sun, J. (2010). Enteric bacteria and cancer stem cells. Cancers (Basel), 3(1), 285–297.
Touvier, M., Chan, D.S.M., Lau, R., Aune, D., Vieira, R., Greenwood, D. C., . . . Norat, T. (2011). Meta-analysis of vitamin D intake, 25-hydroxyvitamin D status, vitamin D receptor polymorphisms, and colorectal cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 20, 1003–1016.
van Duijnhoven, F.J.B., Bueno-De-Mesquita, H. B., Ferrari, P., Jenab, M., Boshuizen, H. C., Ros, M. M., . . . Riboli, E. (2009). Fruit, vegetables, and colorectal cancer risk: The European prospective investigation into cancer and nutrition. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 89, 1441–1452.
Xia, Y., Chen, H.-Q., Zhang, M., Jiang, Y.-Q., Hang, X.-M., and Qin, H.-L. (2011). Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum LP-Onlly on gut flora and colitis in interleukin-10 knockout mice. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 26, 405–411.
Already a member? Log in
Unlock the rest of this paper
135,000+ research papers · AI writing tools · Plagiarism & AI detection
7-Day Pass
Does not renew
Get 7-Day PassMonthly
Renews at $12.99/month until canceled
Start MonthlyAnnual
Renews at $99/year until canceled
Start Annual- Unlimited AI writing tools
- Plagiarism and AI text detection tool
Plan details
Unlimited AI writing tools are for individual, non-automated use and are subject to our Terms of Service and abuse-prevention measures.
TextChecker scans: 3 during the 7-Day Pass, or 5 per month with Monthly and Annual.
Prices exclude applicable tax.
Always verify citation format against your institution’s current style guide requirements.