Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Essay:
Biology and Social Construction Involved in Training Children
It has been quite a continuing debate over the years upon whether biology and genetics play a more important role in the upbringing of children and adaptation of roles or whether social construction and nurture overrides the innate nature. As soon as the child is born and opens his or her eyes into the world, there is a need to determine the kind of person they are going to be, the way they will deal with things and the relationships they will have with people. Human beings are the most social of all animals and are on a constant need to indulge with people around them. It is however recognized that each and every individual out there is different by nature, beliefs, values, morals and much more.
Sociologists and scientists have had a long obsession with trying to determine the extent to which the societal and innate factors affect the upbringing of the child and how the early socialization processes impact the later life of a human being. Some argue that genetics and the true nature of a person is what matters the most and no matter how hard one tries, they cannot influence a person through the upbringing and the nurture process. However, some believe otherwise. It is important to accept and acknowledge that biology as well as the social construction, both have an equal role to play and at some point in life, they cross paths and reflect a mixture of the two.
While we can suggest that the sexes are biologically made and are innate in the humans, the gender roles and the way the two behave is something that the person acquires through socializing and mingling with their own kind. The patterns of behavior and the expectations from both genders vary and are remarkably different based on the society, religion, and place as well as the culture and traditions followed in that region.
Let us first take into account the importance of biological factors and the influence that they have on an individual. The genetics and the innate qualities help shape us into what we are. Some of the habits that we as individuals take up are passed on from the family hereditary chain which cannot be disregarded and are often difficult to ignore or change. There are also certain characteristics in one's nature that they are born with, for instance, a child may naturally be shy or might possess an introvert nature. Others might be more outgoing, bold and outspoken. These kinds of things are generally not taught to a person and are instilled in one's personality. Despite attempts of overcoming these habits and qualities, there are traces of them that are left behind in one's life.
But as mentioned earlier, the two dimensions of a child's personality over lap each other. It is impossible to completely isolate the sociological implications and the influence of the human interactions from the biological and genetic aspect. There is quite a thin line where we can differentiate whether the influence is purely biological or societal.
Many sociologists have developed their own theories about the way society and the social interactions influences the upbringing of children. Sigmund Freud is one of the famous Functionalist sociologists who stated that the most integral part of any individual's life is the first five years of development because they are most crucial. Whatever the child sees, hears, learns and encounters will leave a mark on him or her for their whole life. An incident that may have scared them in their early life will haunt them forever; the habits that they adapt during these years are likely to be stronger than those adapted later on in life. Hence, according to Freud's theory social interactions and nurture does have a heavy influence on the way a child is brought up.
Apart from Freud's theory, some sociologists associate themselves with the labeling theory and the interactionist perspective which believes that individuals and children will often adapt and start acting in the way that people label them. For instance, if a child is labeled as a bully and is constantly called by that name, he or she will eventually accept that label and react in the same way. This is also part of the interaction process and the way children take up roles and behavior from what they see around themselves.
Talking about gender roles also…[continue]
"Biology And Social Construction Involved In Training" (2012, August 03) Retrieved October 23, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/biology-and-social-construction-involved-109736
"Biology And Social Construction Involved In Training" 03 August 2012. Web.23 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/biology-and-social-construction-involved-109736>
"Biology And Social Construction Involved In Training", 03 August 2012, Accessed.23 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/biology-and-social-construction-involved-109736
Social Constructionism and Historiography of Science In the historiography of science, the debate between intenalists and externalists has been one of the major fault lines over the past century. While many historians are not specialists in physics, chemistry and biology, by training and experience they also consider the political, economic and cultural influences on any institution and organization in a given period, and science his not been exempt from historicism. Internlaists
popularized social and cultural trends are merging, intentionally or not, toward laying the foundation for generating a new narrative about what it means to learn across a lifespan in an environment conducive to healthy living. It seeks to examine the coalescing of what is called lifelong learning side-by-side with the theories and practices related to the evolution of ecological thinking and environmental awareness. The idea that life can be
Personality Theories in Psychology To the layperson, the term personality is a generic descriptor for an individual's traits. However, personality has a more specific meaning to psychologists. According to Dan McAdams, "Personality psychology is the scientific study of the whole person" (McAdams, 2006, p.12, para.1). While different psychologists and their theories have become well-known enough to be referenced in casual conversation, there is still some confusion among laypeople about personality
In the first instance, the research undertaken on this topic has attempted to be as inclusive as possible. To this end databases such as Ebscohost and Quesia were consulted for up-to-date sources and data. However the research was also limited to the ideas and objectives suggested in chapter one. The following review is indicative of the some of the most important studies within the parameter of the central questions
It is clear from the studies thus far examined (plus a few more) that the ability to distinguish between animate and inanimate objects develops much earlier than Piaget imagined. Second, while it is unclear from this study if the rules of grammar inform the child's sense of animacy or vice versa, we find that children significantly tend to attribute animate characteristics to a sentence's first noun and inanimate qualities
DNA in Criminal Cases - Solving Cold Cases in California with Forensic Science This research will attempt to analyze and discuss the feasibility of DNA testing in solving cold cases and will study the impact that DNA fingerprinting has had on the forensic science community as a whole. DNA is generally used to solve crimes in one of two ways. In cases where a suspect is identified, a sample of that person's
He exemplifies by saying that anyone witnessing a child about to fall in a well would immediately turn to rescue the child without seeking any advantages in doing so. But while this position has been argued on the grounds that "such an example is not intended to prove that all men will actually take some action in such circumstances" (Allinson apud Chan 1996), Chan has defended Mencius by emphasizing