Counterterrorism and Intelligence Framework Terrorism Has Been Essay

Download this Essay in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Essay:

Counterterrorism and Intelligence Framework

Terrorism has been the greatest threat to American soil since the end of the Cold War, and the country has responded to these threats by creating an elaborate counterterrorism and intelligence framework. This counterterrorism strategy must use every possible tool in America's arsenal, and must meet the highest standards in excellence for the duty it is tasked to perform. The nature of terrorist threats in America in the 21st century is the fact that nobody knows where and why terrorism may appear.

Three agencies will form the core of the new counterterrorism and intelligence gather efforts coordinated by the Department of Homeland Security. (Homeland Security, 2012) These three agencies are the CIA, the FBI, and the DOD, and each already fulfills necessary functions in America's fight on terror. While still operating within the legal framework that surrounds each agency, I look to improve the overall effectiveness of America's counterterrorism efforts. The main differences I propose are administrative in purpose, in order to better align the interests of these three interests under the umbrella of DHS. In this way, the strengths of the three will still be enhanced while maintaining crucial communication links and resource gathering between the three agencies. The more nuanced changes in each agency are discussed below.

The Central Intelligence Agency will change its role in the intelligence community, at least as far as counterterrorism is concerned. Currently, the CIA is an independent agency, but it will have to change in order to become friendlier with its peers in the field of American counterterrorism and intelligence gathering. The CIA currently works as an independent data collector, gathering information from around the world and processing it to better understand the nature of threats facing the United States. (Intelligence.gov, 2012) This data can be collected either electronically, or through hands-on spying. Some CIA agents are even able to infiltrate organizations in order to better understand the structure and operations of that organization. This data is gathered by whatever means possible, and has been a critical link in the fight against terrorism since September 11th.

The CIA has to change its focus from being an independent organization into one connected directly to the Department of Homeland Security. Instead of conducting operations alone without giving out information beforehand, the CIA will be the eyes and ears of the DHS in foreign nations. This will allow CIA operators to better relate information that can be learned by the DHS for dispersal to agencies operating on U.S. soil. The CIA will have agents that operate directly under the command of DHS, which will also be looking at FBI and DOD intelligence, and will commence operations based on the info gathered. The CIA will then be the foreign launch base for counterterrorism military operations, which will bring a closer link between the military community and the espionage community that does not currently exist due to the large degree of separation between the two agencies.

The Federal Bureau of Investigation has assumed the role of intelligence gathering experts on American soil. This practice is far more difficult than that of the CIA, because there are restrictions on what the FBI can do in the investigation of American citizens without a warrant, which requires suspected evidence that the FBI does not have before it begins its intelligence gathering operation. This problem was slightly rectified when the Patriot Act was signed in 2002, that greatly enhanced the ability of the FBI to explore American citizen's records, provided they used secret courts that did not have to report what they were doing and why. These methods have been debated within the country as to whether they are truly following the rules of the Constitution or not, but regardless it has been an essential tool for the FBI.

For the FBI I would recommend greater powers to be able to observe suspected terrorists and filter through cell phone calls and text messages in ways that are currently impossible. The FBI will act in a professional manner and will not release evidence to the court without being sure that it would have all that it takes to find its case. This means that if more powers are given to the FBI, it would be able to exercise more of the powers that the CIA has perfected in the past decade on American citizens. The spying techniques of the CIA are unparalleled, and the FBI, generally thought of as a detective or police agency, will learn valuable knowledge from the CIA's operations abroad, where no protections are afforded foreign nationals.

The Department of Defense has several counterterrorism agencies that operate in different arenas and for different purposes. These include the Air Force Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance Agency, the Army Intelligence and Security Command, the Defense Intelligence Agency, the Marine Corps Intelligence Agency, the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency, the National Reconnaissance Office, the National Security Agency, and finally the Office of Naval Intelligence. Together, these agencies provide a full range of utility, but represent a burdensome and inefficient process by which to conduct careful intelligence work. These intelligence groups focus on the function of intelligence collection, in order to better understand the adversaries these military branches will face in the field. The problem with this system is the fact that information is not uniform across the agencies, and that the separate branches have too much bureaucracy between gathering information for themselves and interacting with America's other intelligence services, such as the CIA or the FBI.

If the Department of Defense wishes to be useful in the active profession of intelligence gathering, it requires a streamlining of its military branches into one single counterterrorism military branch, which can operate on every front on the counterterrorism effort. This branch will either be rolled into the U.S. Army, the Marines, or split off as its own independent branch, with exclusive purview over counterterrorism strategy and tactics. This branch would have to be very close with the Department of Homeland Security in order to ensure that these military units could take orders from an administrative organization. It would not require heavy military hardware, but would use a range of tools from intelligence gathering in a military setting to light infantry troop transports like helicoptors in order to rapidly reach areas where counterterrorism military units are required. This is why this agency would be best matched with one of the established military branches, in order to share resources and maintain a more streamlined and cheaper operation overseas. Their combat readiness will depend on speed and expertise in dealing with counterterrorism efforts wherever they are needed around the world.

These three agencies will interact in a forced open manner by the Department of Homeland Security. The Department of Defense will develop its own formula for interacting with non-military personnel that they will encounter in both the FBI and the CIA. The military personnel will follow the intelligence leads that the FBI and CIA drop on to them, and they will be able to train and understand the network of terrorists that they are expected to face in the near future. The CIA will continue its espionage operations like always, but the administration will give up some of its independence. This will allow for other agencies to see into what the CIA is doing more easily, and will allow for better coordination across agencies. The CIA and FBI are notoriously competitors, and this problem may have contributed to the intelligence gap before the September 11th disaster. A close link between the two agencies must be forged, and this may be possible if the powers requested for the FBI are granted, and the agency is able to take a form on counterterrorism that is more in line with the CIA. Then, the CIA will be able to pass information in a uniform manner between the FBI and DOD, and the three agencies will be able to speak the same language in terms of counterterrorism.

One of the primary tools of counterterrorism and intelligence gathering has been the ability to track financial records of suspected terrorists. (Lee Myers, 2012) The closer ties the United States has formed around the world in the past decade since September 11th has paid off by allowing the U.S. To sift through controversial records of suspected terrorists. Nations allow this to happen because they know they can gain good will with the United States, and put an end to an unstable threat to the country in the form of active terrorists on their soil at the same time. Nations such as Afghanistan and Iraq have found this practice to be extremely useful in their relations with the U.S. This alliance between the local governments and the financial institutions has been beneficial to both parties.

Another tool of counterterrorism and intelligence is that of the massive spy network established by having American born Muslims infiltrate extremist cells in order to put an end to their violence. This operation has been tricky for the U.S., due…[continue]

Cite This Essay:

"Counterterrorism And Intelligence Framework Terrorism Has Been" (2012, May 13) Retrieved November 28, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/counterterrorism-and-intelligence-framework-79959

"Counterterrorism And Intelligence Framework Terrorism Has Been" 13 May 2012. Web.28 November. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/counterterrorism-and-intelligence-framework-79959>

"Counterterrorism And Intelligence Framework Terrorism Has Been", 13 May 2012, Accessed.28 November. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/counterterrorism-and-intelligence-framework-79959

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Counterterrorism and Intelligence Framework

    Counterterrorism Counter-Terrorism Counter-Terrorism Framework The author of this report is asked to answer to a number of questions relating to counter-terrorism frameworks. First, the author is asked to provide a revised framework for the national terrorism prevention and response agencies in the United States. Per the parameters of the assignment, there are to be at least three agencies involved in the revised framework. Subsequent to that, the author is asked to answer to

  • Counterterrorism in the Contemporary World Terrorists Are

    Counterterrorism In the contemporary world, terrorists are groups or individuals who use covert warfare to press for political, social, or cultural reform. Rather than using the political process though, they believe that violence is the only way they can prove to the world that their cause is just -- and the psychological terror engendered will engage the world, if not in sympathy, then at least in acknowledgement and fear that their

  • Influence of International Terrorism on Domestic Terrorism

    International Terrorism on Domestic Terrorism- Domestic terrorism has existed within the United State for a long time. It has influenced the United States' political and social structure to varying degrees. Before, the word "terrorist" and "terrorism" it was being used by the French Revolution in a positive way referring to the Jacobins' actions. As time has gone by, these words have turned to be used to refer to array of

  • American Terrorism for Many People

    The USA Patriot Act: This was a law that was passed after September 11th. It is giving the police and intelligence officials the power to go after terrorists organizations easier. As it lifted various Constitutional protections when investigating these offenses. Counter Terrorism: These are the activities that: federal, state and local officials are taking to prevent future terrorist attacks. Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD): These are weapons designed to inflict large amounts

  • Counter Terrorism and Social Media Freedom vs Security

    Counter-Terrorism and Social Media: Freedom vs. Security The United States prides itself to being the most democratic nation of the world, with the highest respect for the human being, for its values, norms, and dreams. At the same time, before 9/11, it was also considered to be one of the safest nations of the world. The attacks on the World Trade Center towers, in particular pointed out that there are gaps

  • Intelligence in Homeland Security There

    Integrated agreements will assist in targeting the maximum federal funding at the greatest risk counties, cities and states where through the addition of more funds, security of citizens will be increased (U.S. Congress 2010). U.S. Department of Homeland Security should uphold on what it considers being right. It should be firm on actions vital to the country's ability to respond to such issues. It should issue a mandate on

  • Domestic Terrorism

    Domestic Terrorism America is home to people with varied cultural backgrounds who have been confined into one political and geographical territory. These people may have issues and conflicts but still find themselves living together because of shared territorial borders (Zalman, 2013). The United States has managed for a very long time to contain multitude of people with diverse religious, political, and cultural views in relative harmony. Incidences of terrorist attacks that


Read Full Essay
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved