Foreign Policy Bureaucracy How Do Research Paper

PAGES
3
WORDS
982
Cite

The U.S. And Russia reportedly have about 90% of all the nuclear weapons in the world. So if this treaty makes sense for both sides, and shows a newfound sense of cooperation between the two nations that were Cold War enemies, why would there be dissention in the U.S. Senate? That question can be answered a couple different ways. For one, there is a very divided and hostile political situation in Washington, D.C.; during the past two years the major pieces of legislation that Obama has pushed through have received not a single Republican vote. Obama's stimulus bill, $862 billion, that many economists say helped avoid a depression, did not get a single Republican vote. The biggest reform of Wall Street in the nation's history passed without a single Republican vote, and likewise, the healthcare reform act, a "major overhaul" -- that will provide 30 million Americans with health coverage and will prevent the health insurance industry from canceling policies just because a policyholder gets will -- did not receive any votes from Republicans (Tapper, 2010). The reasons Republicans refused to cooperate with Obama and the Democrats are not clear, but it seems obvious that conservatives do not want to see Obama get any legislative victories.

That having been said, Obama and the Democrats believe they have secured enough Republican votes to get the two-thirds majority they need. Republican Senator Richard Lugar of Indiana explained one key reason to pass this legislation. Getting it passed will "enable American teams to return to...

...

The senator added, "These inspections greatly reduce the possibility that we will be surprised by Russian nuclear deployments or advancements." Lugar's remarks were apt and poignant because the U.S. weapons inspections of current Russian nuclear warheads ended last year, when the arms control treaty of 1991 ran out.
But not all Republicans were willing to go along with the reduction in warheads. Some wanted to wait until 2011, when the Republicans have more members in the Congress. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee called the effort to get the Senate to ratify the treaty "reckless."

Conclusion

The Congress and the executive branch have a duty to the American people to cooperate and consult one another on important foreign policy treaties. Their duty is Constitutionally mandated, but it is also vitally important that the American people know the branches of government in Washington are cooperating when it comes to reducing the deadly threat of a nuclear war.

Works Cited

Tapper, Jake. "Passage of Major legislation Can't Stop Obama's Poll Numbers From Dropping."

ABC News. Retrieved Dec. 17, 2010, from http://abcnews.go.com.

United States Senate. "Treaties." Retrieved Dec. 17, 2010, from http://www.senate.gov.

Yahoo News. "Senate kicks off debate over U.S. -- Russia arms treaty." Retrieved Dec. 17,

2010, from http://news.yahoo.com. (2010).

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Tapper, Jake. "Passage of Major legislation Can't Stop Obama's Poll Numbers From Dropping."

ABC News. Retrieved Dec. 17, 2010, from http://abcnews.go.com.

United States Senate. "Treaties." Retrieved Dec. 17, 2010, from http://www.senate.gov.

Yahoo News. "Senate kicks off debate over U.S. -- Russia arms treaty." Retrieved Dec. 17,
2010, from http://news.yahoo.com. (2010).


Cite this Document:

"Foreign Policy Bureaucracy How Do" (2010, December 17) Retrieved April 18, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/foreign-policy-bureaucracy-how-do-11584

"Foreign Policy Bureaucracy How Do" 17 December 2010. Web.18 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/foreign-policy-bureaucracy-how-do-11584>

"Foreign Policy Bureaucracy How Do", 17 December 2010, Accessed.18 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/foreign-policy-bureaucracy-how-do-11584

Related Documents

28). The directions that this new "great and powerful" friend takes in the next 20 years will have a pronounced effects on what type of foreign policy is needed to maintain the middle road aspired to by Australian foreign policymakers. In the Australia's Defence Department's White Paper, "Defending Australia in the Asia Pacific century: Force 2030," published in 2009, a number of eventualities are examined in terms of the

Dell, HP, Microsoft, Exxon Mobil and Wal-Mart has emerged as the strong candidates in the international market, which has been possible only because the companies have avoided and curtailed the possible security risk either through strategy in which the focus has been to aver the security concerns either through provisions for the social welfare of the people in the region, or through relocation (Erik, 2004). The United States has

Introduction The military experience that President Dwight D. Eisenhower took to the White House was largely without precedent. In sharp contrast to President Harry S. Truman’s years, some of the White House functions and structures were reorganized – with new positions being introduced in an attempt to promote the efficient running of government business. President John F. Kennedy, on the other hand, sought to ease the bureaucratic structure left by his

American Foreign Policy
PAGES 2 WORDS 713

BRANCHES OF U.S. GOVERNMENT HAS MORE TO SAY IN FOREIGN POLICY DECISION MAKING? WHY? The Executive Branch has the most 'say' in making foreign policy, as only the president administrates the day-to-day affairs of the nation as a whole, and as he or she is the only nationally elected official. The president negotiates treaties, and acts as head of state and commander in chief of the armed forces. But presidential

Foreign Aid Is Defined As
PAGES 5 WORDS 2103

S. AID and other donors within the years 1960 and 1980 has vanished into oblivion. According to Brain Atwood, U.S. AID administrator who mentions about the doles extended to Zaire that the investment of more than $2 billion of American foreign aid was fruitless. The 1980s has been branded by the United Nations Development Program as the "lost decade" in case of a number of poorer nations. Over a greater part

Policy Recommendation for Collaboration and TSA Privatization The objective of this study is to evaluate the benefits of collaboration between the federal government and non-profit organizations. The study cites different examples of collaborations across the world and their achievements. Moreover, the paper investigates whether it is beneficial to privatize the TSA (Transportation Security Administration) since the organization has performed below the international standards in the last few years. Finally, the study