Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Freedom of information is needed to ensure that government and business is transparent and accountable. However, the mass proliferation of computer and communication technologies has created a unique vulnerability that makes it difficult for agencies to effective protect security and privacy without reducing overall access to information. With this in mind, efforts to resolve this dichotomy must be considered.
3.1 Building Better it Infrastructure
Critically reviewing what scholars have noted about balancing freedom of information with privacy and security, the development and implementation of secure information technology infrastructure has been noted as a principle issue for improving outcomes in this area . Scholars argue that with the right it infrastructure in place, agencies will be able to effectively review and evaluate data to determine its relevance in terms of compromising personal information or security. In short, an additional layer of it infrastructure is needed to ensure that agencies are able to make positive decisions about information sharing and data transfer .
In addition to improving the infrastructure of it systems, researchers also argue that efforts to develop it systems will also facilitate the development of clear protocols and standards for improving the security of it systems . Because these systems are vulnerable to attack, which can markedly compromise the integrity of data, improved systems will help effectively reduce this threat. Further, scholars argue that through this process it will become a central feature for organizational development; presently, it is often under-funded and overlooked in terms of organizational development .
3.2 Defining Free Information
The final issue that should be considered in the context of balancing freedom of information and privacy and security is that of clearly defining what is meant by information. Scholars examining freedom of information argue that what information should and should not be available remains a persistent challenge for most agencies . Although efforts to address this issue have been considered in the past, the reality is that what should and does constitute free information varies from organization to organization and individual to individual. With this in mind, a clear definition of what information should be free and what free information is may provide a stronger basis for developing guidelines that will effectively improve safety and security while allowing government agencies to ensure that they protect personal data and national security.
Synthesizing all of the data provided in this investigation, it becomes evident that a true dichotomy has been created in the context of modern society. Freedom of information, while a vital and necessary part of democratic development, may compromise privacy and security -- two issues that are also important for the development of a democracy. Although this research demonstrates that balancing both of these issues is a formidable challenge for both government agencies and private organizations, the reality is that some consensus on how to achieve each of these goals must be garnered. Without consensus on these issues, the debate over how to effectively balance these issues will only become exacerbated over the course of time.
Given the importance of reconciling these issues, this investigation proposes two specific solutions that may provide some improvements to the current situation. In addition to fortify information technology infrastructure, an effort to define and understand what is meant by free or public information must be considered. Only by reaching consensus on the issue and creating clear guidelines will it be possible for the government and citizens to find a balance between freedom of information and privacy and security. Without consensus, this debate will continue with no effective resolution.
1] Holsen, S. (2007). Freedom of information in the UK, U.S. And Canada. Information Management Journal, 41(3), 50-55.
2] Kirtley, J.E. (2006). Transparency and accountability in a time of terror: The Bush Administration's assault on freedom of information. Communication Law & Policy, 11(4), 479-509.
3] Swartz, N. (2004). The world moves toward freedom of information. Information Management Journal, 28(6), 20-23.
4] Halstuk, M.E., & Chamberlin, B.F. (2006). The Freedom of Information Act 1966-2006: A retrospective on the rise of privacy protection over the…[continue]
"Freedom Of Information Vs Privacy" (2007, November 23) Retrieved December 3, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/freedom-of-information-vs-privacy-34066
"Freedom Of Information Vs Privacy" 23 November 2007. Web.3 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/freedom-of-information-vs-privacy-34066>
"Freedom Of Information Vs Privacy", 23 November 2007, Accessed.3 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/freedom-of-information-vs-privacy-34066
As will be discussed, this has serious implications for security issues on both a personal, organizational and corporate level. A central concern is that, as the number of users increase online so does the potential threat of invasion of privacy in many insidious forms. This can lead to serious ethical infringements of privacy, such as fraud and identity theft. As Miyazaki, and Fernandez ( 2001) emphasize; This rapid growth (of the
This has been the basic rationale for every totalitarian state during the Twentieth Century. It is the idea that if the people relinquish their rights -- especially their rights to keep anything hidden from the government -- then the government will be better able to ensure that no potential threats to the security of the citizenry ever manifest themselves. This premise, however, is based on the faulty idea that
Wikileaks "If I had to choose between government without newspapers, and newspapers without government, I wouldn't hesitate to choose the newspapers." Thomas Jefferson Founded in 2006, WikiLeaks is a non-profit organization that publishes submissions of private, secret, and classified media from anonymous news sources and news leaks. Recently, the site has been responsible for publishing a multitude of military intelligence as well as diplomatic cables. For example, the Wikileaks Iraq War Logs showed
Privacy vs. Freedom of Press The right to privacy is more important than the freedom of the press. A great deal of media intrusion is abuse of press freedom by solely aiming to boost circulation by feeding on public interest instead of determining what is in the public's best interest (Skidelsky). Courts have held there is no special privileges on journalists. The right to privacy should be protected by press unless
Layne', in December 1994, the Office of the Information and Privacy Commissioner received a compliant that the Vancouver Police Department had taken a decision to block out the faces of those person who were being interviewed by the police in the program, "To Serve and to Protect." The complainant was KF Media Inc., of Vancouver B.C. KF Media Inc. who was the producer of the program, and it generally
Privacy Security National Security vs. Individual Liberties A Long Standing Debate has Taken a New Turn in the Modern Digital Era WikiLeaks The Edward Snowden Leaks Liberty and National Security The debate between national security and individual liberties, especially privacy, has reached new proportions as technology has increased the ability for the state to create mass surveillance programs. The events that occurred on September 11th, 2001, definitely changed the political and social landscape within the United
When the National Security Agency (NSA) of the United States is collection information in bulk with no rhyme or reason to it, that can become too might quite quickly. While it is wise to keep an eye on chatter and look for key words, phrases and patterns, there is indeed rules of evidence and the needs for warrants in many cases and that should be respected. The United States