Hollywood Vs. Bollywood Society Has Essay

PAGES
5
WORDS
1419
Cite

This is the kind of film that changes the international public's opinion in regard to Bollywoodian motion pictures. While Slumdog Millionaire essentially presents the central character as he undergoes a series of adventures filled with intense colors and feelings coming straight from the slums of Mumbai, most Bollywoodian films focus on concepts such as dancing, singing, and surreal stunts performed by characters that appear to have supernatural powers. These are the motion pictures that are generally associated with the Bollywood film environment.

In contrast to Slumdog Millionaire, Martin Scorsese's Shutter Island puts across elements characteristic to Western culture in general. The film relates to concepts such as the Second World War, Nazi prisoner camps, and American cultural values. It is basically the result of some of Hollywood's most renowned individuals and it manages to address an international public without actually focusing on the importance of the actors playing in it, as it is actually concentrated on the storyline.

With Scorsese directing it and Ben Kingsley and Leonardo DiCaprio starring in it, Shutter Island is a typical Western film addressing an international public and using elements that are Western in character, but that are likely to have people coming from diverse backgrounds identify with the characters and their experiences. This film is not necessarily meant to be American or Western, as it simply follows a recipe that is considered to be effective in the case of individuals who want their motion pictures to receive support from viewers. It uses a clever script, efficient filming techniques, and renowned characters, virtually having everything that it needs in order to attract crowds in large numbers. This is why Hollywood is in some cases better than Bollywood: it has access to a wider range of renowned actors, directors, and film crews.

When considering both Shutter Island and Slumdog Millionaire, one is likely to think...

...

However, these two films are different because of the traditions that they follow, the name of the actors playing in them, and the fact that the international public is more probable to express interest in a film made in Hollywood than in one made by the Bollywoodian film industry. Bollywood experiences significant detriments as a consequence of the fact that people have come to associate it with the concept of a cheap Hollywood. As long as it will continue to produce films like Slumdog Millionaire, the Bollywoodian film business is going to experience success in the future and recognition from the public. However, this would practically mean that it would deny the local public the right to be presented with films that it enjoys. It is thus a question of interest: does Bollywood want to address an international public or does it want to stick to making films meant to be appreciated by audiences that are predominantly Indian? It is certainly difficult to determine whether Bollywood would mature through making motion pictures for an international public or whether it would simply lose its uniqueness.
All things considered, Bollywood has proved itself capable of rivaling Hollywood and it has a lot of chances to surpass the Los Angeles giant if it continues to concentrate on making films that can be appreciated both by Indian audiences and by international viewers. Even with that, the fact that Hollywood has the resources and the tradition needed to provide people with some of the best films available makes it increasingly difficult for a national film industry to compete with it.

Works cited:

Desai, Jigna, Beyond Bollywood: The Cultural Politics of South Asian Diasporic Film (New York: Routledge, 2004)

Khatami, Elham, "Is Bollywood coming to Hollywood?," Retrieved December 5, 2011, from the CNN Website: http://articles.cnn.com/2009-02-23/entertainment/bollywood.hollywood_1_indian-cinema-french-new-wave-cinema-mumbai-based?_s=PM:SHOWBIZ

Tyrrell, Heather, "24 Bollywood vs. Hollywood," Culture and Global Change, ed. Tracey Skelton andTim Allen (London: Routledge, 1999)

Dir. Danny Boyle. Slumdog Millionaire. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Warner Bros. Pictures (U.S.).

Dir. Martin Scorsese, Shutter Island. Paramount Pictures

Sources Used in Documents:

Works cited:

Desai, Jigna, Beyond Bollywood: The Cultural Politics of South Asian Diasporic Film (New York: Routledge, 2004)

Khatami, Elham, "Is Bollywood coming to Hollywood?," Retrieved December 5, 2011, from the CNN Website: http://articles.cnn.com/2009-02-23/entertainment/bollywood.hollywood_1_indian-cinema-french-new-wave-cinema-mumbai-based?_s=PM:SHOWBIZ

Tyrrell, Heather, "24 Bollywood vs. Hollywood," Culture and Global Change, ed. Tracey Skelton andTim Allen (London: Routledge, 1999)

Dir. Danny Boyle. Slumdog Millionaire. Fox Searchlight Pictures, Warner Bros. Pictures (U.S.).


Cite this Document:

"Hollywood Vs Bollywood Society Has" (2011, December 05) Retrieved April 25, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/hollywood-vs-bollywood-society-has-48224

"Hollywood Vs Bollywood Society Has" 05 December 2011. Web.25 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/hollywood-vs-bollywood-society-has-48224>

"Hollywood Vs Bollywood Society Has", 05 December 2011, Accessed.25 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/hollywood-vs-bollywood-society-has-48224

Related Documents

It has made joint ventures with Hollywood that have done quite well at the box office. The Indian movies are not only seen in India, but the industry has also made arrangements for showcasing their productions at International platforms, as these movies are dubbed and on aired in many other languages all over the world. In the past, most of the movies that were produced in India were Masala

Bollywood has many recognizable elements of style; "The distinctive features of popular Hindi cinema -- song and dance, melodrama, lavish production values, emphasis upon stars and spectacle -- are common to films made in Southern industries as well," (Ganti 2004 p 3). There are many differences that create a discrepancy between the traditional Hollywood style and that seen in Hindi films. Bollywood films tend to add more emotion to

Set 2: United Kingdom Media The Guardian Across the ocean, Phillip French wrote a review in the United Kingdom-based newspaper, The Guardian on the 10th of October, 2004. The review did not flatter this particular movie in the least. French categorized the film as popular fare, keeping in vein with Chadha's earlier works, and still having nothing clever to offer. "Chadha, as she has shown in her previous pictures - Bhaji on the

Media Capital: Towards the Study of Spatial Flows," author Michael Curtin asserts that academic study of media as it relates to Asian countries has been written with the archaic idea of these nations as developing countries. While it is still certainly true that some Asian countries are technologically disadvantaged, many of them, particularly China and Japan are equal if not surpassing the media production of western countries. In addition,

viewer ship of Hindi Films with respect to the Non-Asian population in the UK The Hindi film industry or the 'Bollywood' as it has been referred to have made a significant mark not only in the Indian society, but has had far reaching influence among Indians residing abroad. We shall concentrate on the Hindi films in the UK with respect to the resident Indian population. The United Kingdom alone accounts

(Stiglitz, 2006) The concept of globalization can be seen in many different ways ranging from the spread of democratic societies throughout the world right down to the film industry. The example I chose to illustrate globalization is the spread of the film industry to India and what has become known as "Bollywood." For years people in India were infatuated with American films. Slowly the Indian film industry took many ideas