Iran's Global Reach Research Paper

PAGES
4
WORDS
1360
Cite

Iran's Global Reach The degree of efficacy with which Iran's intelligence agencies could gather meaningful intelligence in support of an armed conflict with the United States in the case of the former taking military action against the latter due to Iran's nuclear program is somewhat difficult to ascertain. The difficulty, of course, lies in the decidedly specious nature of Iran's intelligence capacity which, for the sake of public appearances, is largely posited to include "intelligence about the Middle East and Central Asia and domestic intelligence and monitoring of clerical and government officials as well as work on preventing conspiracies against the Islamic republic" (Cordesman 2007, 13). However, there is also a significant amount of evidence in existence that underscores the fact that Iran's intelligence and military capabilities have expanded throughout the globe, either directly through the nation or through its affiliation with other nation states, which may be able to deliver a significant amount of intelligence to aid in an armed conflict with the U.S. To that end, it is not inconceivable that Iran could gather sufficient intelligence about the United States, although due to the nature of the military network with which such information would be gathered, the expedience and the effectiveness of it would more than likely not be as comparable to that which it could provide for a foe closer to the middle east nation.

The following quotation underscores both the demonstrated level of respect worthy of Iranian intelligence forces as well as the pervasiveness of its surreptitious nature which makes it largely difficult to gauge in terms of its expansion to western powers and operations within the U.S. "Iran's Ministry of Intelligence and Security (MOIS is ranked by experts as one of the largest and most active intelligence agencies in the middle East, having masterminded 450 acts of terrorism throughout the world since the 1980s, yet it has been shrouded in so much mystery that apart from the occasional revelations by the Iranian Resistance, little has ever been made public about its operations and functions" (No author 2005)....

...

There is a cutting duality to the elucidation of this quotation, which not only underscores the potency of MOIS ("450" terrorist acts since the "1980s") but also the inherent circumscriptions regarding the nature of those acts, since the organization is described as mysterious. Furthermore, it should be noted that most of the known acts of aggression that MOIS has been at least partly responsible for have taken place in regions that are closer to its Middle Eastern basis of operations. Yet the potential for MOIS to expand its operations to encompass the monitoring and surveillance of North America lies in the high degree of autonomy which it has at its disposal, and which is "directly answerable to the Iranian regime's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei" (No author 2005). Its autonomous nature is typified by the fact that it "has a secret budget, and stands above the law" (No author 2005).
In the wake of such descriptions of MOIS's potential and traditional base of operations, it becomes prudent to examine the Iran's international connections which may aid the organization in gathering intelligence about the U.S. In the event that the latter were to induce military action against the Middle Eastern nation due to it production of and proclivity for nuclear weapons. The most salient of these connections include fairly intimate relationships with a group known as the Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps and with the Al Quds force, which is proven by the following quotation. "The IRGC has contributed some 125,000 men to Iran's forces in recent years and has substantial capabilities for asymmetric warfare and covert operations. This includes the Al Quds Force and other elements that operate covertly or openly overseas, working with Hezbollah of Lebanon, Shi'ite militias in Iraq, and Shi'ites in Afghanistan (Cordesman 2007, 3)." What is significant about this quotation is the widespread network that MOIS has with the aforementioned organizations, that have infiltrated through nation states outside of Iran and engaged in "covert operations," of which intelligence is an essential component.

With the Quds and the IRGC operating…

Sources Used in Documents:

Bibliography

Associated Press. 2007. Experts: Iran's Quds Forces Deeply Enmeshed in Iraq. Cario, Egypt. Fox News. Online. Available from internet, http://www.foxnews.com/printer_friendly_story/0,3566,252212,00.html accessed 6 December 2011.

Cordesman, Anthony. 2007. Iran's Revolutionary Guards, The Al Quds Force, And Other Intelligence And Paramilitary Forces. Center For Strategic And International Studies.

No author. 2005. Iran's Ministry of Intelligence and Security. Berlin, Germany. Iran Focus News and Analysis. Online. Available from internet, http://www.iranfocus.com/en/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=2020 accessed 6 December 2011.

Shane, Scott. 2007. Iranian Force, Focus of U.S., Still a Mystery. Washington D.C. The New York Times. Online. Available from internet. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/02/17/world/middleeast/17quds.html?pagewanted=print, accessed 6 December 2011.


Cite this Document:

"Iran's Global Reach" (2011, December 06) Retrieved April 26, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/iran-global-reach-48259

"Iran's Global Reach" 06 December 2011. Web.26 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/iran-global-reach-48259>

"Iran's Global Reach", 06 December 2011, Accessed.26 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/iran-global-reach-48259

Related Documents
Global Marketplace
PAGES 2 WORDS 646

Globalization & Leadership Leadership itself, even within a single country or other geographical area, is complex enough but it can become all the more complex and wide-ranging when speaking of a firm or organization that spreads into a new country or series of countries. Many countries that have become part of the globalization landscape are completely different and on many levels than the West and this would include Central and South

Iran's Nuclear Threat
PAGES 6 WORDS 1996

Iran's Nuclear Threat: As the development of Iran's nuclear program has increased rapidly, there has been a simultaneous increase in the amount of enriched uranium that could be swiftly transformed into weapons-grade material. While Iranian leaders continue to state that the nuclear program is geared towards peaceful purposes, there are increased concerns that the development of a nuclear bomb would be a major security threat. In attempts to discourage and prevent

Here, the British are implicated in a number of ways which are obvious and damning with respect to the fate of European Jewry in the coming years. 3. Examine the events in Palestine 1945 to 1948. Why, in your opinion did the United Nations propose the partition of Palestine? (2 pages) After World War II, when the full extent of the horrors of the Holocaust had become apparent to the global

As a report entitled Politicizing the IAEA against Iran states, "….as the latest report indicates, the IAEA is being transformed from an objective international organization to a politicized one to be used by the United States and its allies to advance their agenda regarding Iran's uranium enrichment program." In the final analysis there are no realistic options to a negotiated settlement of the problem. A solution will require both sides

Whereas Poindexter defended the President staunchly, North did not. North genuinely believed that his orders were issued by the President, via Poindexter and McFarlane before him ("United States v. Oliver L. North"). Poindexter testified that he "deliberately withheld the information from President Reagan because 'I wanted the President to have some deniability so that he would be protected,'" ("United States v. John M. Poindexter"). According to the National Security Archives, Poindexter's

Iran and the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty George W. Bush has labeled Iran part of the three nations which most threaten United States security as a nation, along with Iraq and North Korea. He based this statement on the premise that these three nations were developing "weapons of mass destruction," specifically, nuclear arms. Iraq, it has already been established, does not have weapons of mass destruction. North Korea might, and is currently