Leadership And Self-Assessment Organizational Behavior An Analysis Essay

Leadership and Self-Assessment Organizational Behavior

An Analysis of how Self-Evaluation and Self-Assessment relates to Leadership Today

The modern organizational environment must keep pace with changes that are occurring at a historically unprecedented rate. Many of these changes are driven by technology and require that leaders continually learn new skills in order to stay abreast of needed skill requirements. It is often the case that a leader will have difficulty getting performance feedback from their superiors because they generally do not work in close contact with supervisors and in some case may not even have one at all. Therefore a leader must rely on self-assessments primarily to further develop the skill set that will allow them to help their organization create or maintain a competitive advantage.

360 Degree Feedback and Self-Evaluation

Evaluation is an important component of any organization. The use of an evaluation program has been shown to be able to reduce employees' levels of stress and an employee's reduce their intentions to quit and turnover rate (Avey, et al., 2009). However, it is difficult to offer effective evaluations to many members of the organization, especially leaders. The top down approach to feedback has been shown to be inadequate for leaders in many circumstances because many leaders operate with substantial autonomy. For example, the supervisor for many leadership positions many not actually spend much time working with their subordinate and thus cannot generally offer only a limited amount of insightful information that can be used for effective feedback.

Many researchers have tried to address this problem...

...

The feedback that a leader can gain in this system is far more comprehensive that the traditional model. Not only does the leader receive the same top-down evaluation in the more traditional systems, but they also can receive evaluations from their peers as wells as from subordinates, customers, or whoever else can provide offer a perspective on the leaders performance. This feedback can then be used as the basis of a self-evaluation is also commonly included in the system. The system works by providing feedback from the people who surround the individual on an organizational chart which can be thought of as a circle and hence the term "360-degree" was applied to the systems name.
An effective evaluation system that can provide opportunities for career development can serve as a valuable tool in regards to attraction, retention, and motivation (Becker, et al., 2011). Many people in leadership positions are actively seeking to develop their careers and receiving timely and appropriate feedback can help to further employees in their own personal ambitions. Since the feedback comes from all angles, it also provides and incentive to maintain performance in all situations as it is possible that they are being evaluated. It also provides more depth in regards to feedback because leaders can get a sense of how they are viewed from different perspectives. This feedback can serve as a foundation for a self-evaluation that considers many viewpoints including one's own.

One of the major drawbacks for a leader to implement a 360 degree feedback system is that it is time consuming,…

Sources Used in Documents:

Works Cited

Alipour, F., K., I. & Karimi, R., 2011. Knowledge Creation and Transfer: Role of Learning Organization. International Journal of Business Administration, 2(3), pp. 61-67.

Avey, J., Luthans, F. & Jensen, S., 2009. Psychological capital: A positive resource for combating employee stress and turnover. Human Resource Management, 48(5), pp. 677-693.

Becker, K., Antuar, N. & Everett, C., 2011. Implementing an employee performance management system in a nonprofit organization. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 21(3), pp. 255-271.

Halliday, S. & Beddie, F., 2009. Informal Learning. At a Glance. National Centre for Vocational Education Research, 12(1), pp. 1-12.


Cite this Document:

"Leadership And Self-Assessment Organizational Behavior An Analysis" (2012, November 10) Retrieved April 20, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/leadership-and-self-assessment-organizational-83031

"Leadership And Self-Assessment Organizational Behavior An Analysis" 10 November 2012. Web.20 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/leadership-and-self-assessment-organizational-83031>

"Leadership And Self-Assessment Organizational Behavior An Analysis", 10 November 2012, Accessed.20 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/leadership-and-self-assessment-organizational-83031

Related Documents

enhance the reliability of this exercise, I requested Alex, a good friend of mine, to rate me by checking statements he believed to be generally true about me. I then proceeded to complete the assessment exercise by checking statements that I believed were a true reflection of myself. Later on, I compared Alex's analysis with my self-analysis. This exercise, I must say, was critical in the assessment of my

With this approach, consultation psychology focuses on the issues of the group as a whole and therefore typically uses group discussions, interviews and observations as opposed to singling out specific individuals. The result is that, by using consultation psychology in the field of industrial and organizational psychology, the focus is on the group and the roles the individuals who make up the group play. With this focus, industrial and

There are no good or bad personalities, and diversity creates strength. This is particularly true in terms of teams, where having D, I, S, and C-types working harmoniously together enables all tasks to get done by the individuals with the greatest core strengths in specific interpersonal areas. Different team members can compensate for one another's weaknesses. One problem with team-building between different types, however, is the fact that the different

Careers in the corporate sector, especially those within multinational organizations, NGOs or government agencies would be the ones most suitable for my personality and value system. Similarly, my ability to deal with change and stress make me well-suited for careers in the global business environment, in which I would be expected to travel and communicate with people from different cultural backgrounds than my own. The Gospel and Personal Reflection" offers

Assessment Synthesis Some of my mistrust may come from my personal timeliness, and my sense that teams can occasionally procrastinate and pull other people back. Accepting others differences is indeed difficult. (Kroeger, Thuesen & Rutledge, 2002, p. 3) I need to make the differences of others work better for both myself, and my organization. Even if I am doing a good job, I must make my internal criticism of others less

Organization Behavior "Performance Management" and "People Performance" Performance Management and People "Performance Management" and "People Performance" Management SUMMARY The purpose of this paper is to discuss and critically evaluate the Performance Management model by Michael Armstrong and People Performance model by John Purcell. The paper starts with an ample introduction and significance of the employee performance management practices and proceeds by discussing the various concepts and strategies which are incorporated by business organizations all over