Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from essay:
Toyota has specifically created the TPS to break down the organizational barriers between suppliers and create a more effective approach at managing knowledge workflows between suppliers and also with Toyota itself. To accomplish this, Toyota actually works with suppliers to re-engineer their internal learning processes, making available a system integration team that is responsible for creating the necessary process integration links within and between suppliers (Dyer, Nobeoka 2000). This integration of processes within suppliers and just Toyota itself can take up to a year or longer, and when overlaid to the broader supplier network, it can take easily up to eighteen months to two years. All of this effort and investment made by Toyota however is focused on transforming knowledge of processes and quality standards into a competitive advantage. Toyota is unique in that it's open nurturing of suppliers and the continual investment in cross-supplier collaboration (Amasaka, Sakai, 2009). Clearly Toyota is competing primarily on knowledge and second on products (Dyer, Nobeoka 2000). This approach to creating a learning ecosystem is also prevalent in the approach taken for integrating lean manufacturing concepts throughout factories globally, where the TPS is modeled in specific markets where supply chain coordinated at the local level is critical (Black, 2007).
The structure of the learning organisation then is more attuned to a continuous learning process (Amasaka, Sakai, 2009) to ensure trust and continual enrichment is attained across the entire supplier base. For organisations to sustain this level of continuous learning processes the velocity of information and the quality of it must be consistently high; this was a key lesson learned by Toyota in terms of keeping suppliers participating in the knowledge transfer aspects of their TPS (Dyer, Nobeoka 2000). Further, the consensus-based approach to integrating new it investments throughout the supply chain globally also ensured a higher level of adoption initially as well, especially in the area of shared manufacturing metrics (Amasaka, Sakai, 2009). The continuous learning process then became an essential part of the learning ecosystem. Suppliers began to rely on the TPS cross-supplier coordination and collaboration to better understand how to stay in compliance to Toyota's quality management standards and also ensure a higher level of on-time deliveries (Dyer, Nobeoka 2000).
Applying Learning Theories to Organisations
The learning theories of behaviorism, cognitivism, constructivism and information or connectivism as learning theories all apply from different contexts within organsations. Using the Kolb LSI the development of operand-based conditioning strategies for ensuring learning outcomes (Simmons, 2006) in addition to classical conditioning in the case of individualized learning structured using scaffolding (Najjar, 2008) have proven effective for behaviorist based approaches to nurturing learning. Cognitivism in the context of organizational learning has relied extensively on the Kolb LSI to understand the gestalt of learning processes specifically along the dimensions of autonomy, mastery and purpose. The use of constructivism in the context of organisational learning is evident in the approaches used by Toyota in the development of their TPS as a platform for cross-supplier knowledge sharing (Dyer, Nobeoka 2000). Finally connectivism is the precept on which learning ecosystems are based on to ensure more trust and greater information sharing velocities over time (Hannah, Lester, 2009). In short, all four learning theories are pivotal in the development of learning ecosystems within organisations and also enabling individual learning.
The enabling of learning at the individual level sets the foundation for organisational learning over the long-term. When learning strategies center on autonomy, mastery and purpose (Hannah, Lester, 2009) at the individual level, combined with support from senior management (Godkin, Allcorn, 2008) greater levels of long-term retaining of knowledge occur. The Internet has also made it possible to create more personalized approaches to learning, through a technique called scaffolding (Najjar, 2008) which creates individualized learning strategies that can be participated in and monitored over time. Through the use of the Personality Classification Method (Woods, Carter, 1985) and Kolb LSI research instrument, it is possible for organisations to assess learning styles and create optimal teams that will enable and nurture learning over time. All of these factors together also can fuel the development of learning ecosystems within organisations. Learning ecosystems are nurtured and developed when each member of the network is regularly receiving insights and knowledge through a collaborative network. The Toyota Production System is one such learning ecosystem, credited with transforming knowledge into the competitive differentiator of the company (Dyer, Nobeoka 2000).
Amasaka, K., and H. Sakai 2009. TPS-QAS, new production quality management model: key to New JIT - Toyota's global production strategy. International Journal of Manufacturing Technology and Management 18, no. 4, (December 1): 409.
JT Black. 2007. Design rules for implementing the Toyota Production System. International Journal of Production Research 45, no. 16,
(August 1): 3639.
Jeffrey H. Dyer and Kentaro Nobeoka. 2000. Creating and managing a high-performance knowledge-sharing network: The Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal: Special Issue: Strategic Networks 21, no. 3,
(March 1): 345-367.
Godkin, L., and S. Allcorn. 2008. Overcoming Organizational Inertia: A Tripartite Model for Achieving Strategic Organizational Change. The Journal of Applied Business and Economics 8, no. 1, (February 1): 82-94.
Gubbins, C., and S. MacCurtain. 2008. Understanding the Dynamics of Collective Learning: The Role of Trust and Social Capital. Advances in Developing Human Resources 10, no. 4, (August 1): 578.
Hannah, S., and P. Lester. 2009. A multilevel approach to building and leading learning organizations. Leadership Quarterly 20, no. 1, (February 1): 34.
Koivunen, N. 2009. Collective expertise: Ways of organizing expert work in collective settings. Journal of Management and Organization 15, no. 2,
(May 1): 258-276.
Kok, R., and W. Biemans. 2009. Creating a market-oriented product innovation process: A contingency approach. Technovation 29, no. 8, (August 1): 517.
Najjar, M.. 2008. On Scaffolding Adaptive Teaching Prompts within Virtual Labs. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies 6, no. 2,
(April 1): 35-54.
Nielsen, B., and S. Nielsen. 2009. Learning and Innovation in International Strategic Alliances: An Empirical Test of the Role of Trust and Tacitness. The Journal of Management Studies 46, no. 6, (September 1): 1031.
Schilling, J., and a. Kluge. 2009. Barriers to organizational learning: An integration of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews 11, no. 3, (September 1): 337-360.
Simmons, Jeffery a. "An investigation into the role of learning styles…[continue]
"Learning Literature Review Autonomy Mastery" (2009, September 22) Retrieved October 25, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/learning-literature-review-autonomy-mastery-19241
"Learning Literature Review Autonomy Mastery" 22 September 2009. Web.25 October. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/learning-literature-review-autonomy-mastery-19241>
"Learning Literature Review Autonomy Mastery", 22 September 2009, Accessed.25 October. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/learning-literature-review-autonomy-mastery-19241
When portals are designed to the specific requirements of Web 2.0 design objectives, companies with virtual teams are finding they can attain higher levels of shared task ownership as well. This is because there are significantly greater levels of trust overall throughout an organization based on the collective contributions of every member of a virtual and in-office team when they share their knowledge and information together (Mancini, 2010). Portals
Resiliency Literature Review on Resiliency This paper will discus a literature review on resiliency. In order for us to better understand the contents of this research, let us first define and understand what the term resiliency means. Resiliency in this paper will be associated on matters regarding the psychological and behavioral capacity or condition of children and adolescents. Rak and Patterson (1996) in their study Promoting Resilience in At-Risk Children, indicates Hauser
Charter Schools Case Study Review and Development of Questionnaire There is in existence a plethora of research that has been conducted on the long-term effectiveness of charter schools. Much of the research shines negatively on charter schools and their ability in retaining students on a long-term basis. It appears that these alternatives to public education are, at best, average, however, their performance over the long-term decreases exponentially. This work will review the
Motor Learning The objective of this study is to examine the stages of motor learning including cognitive, associative and autonomous stages and the role of attention in learning motor skills. Practice scheduling will be examined and the variable impacting memory and retention of motor skills and the impact of individual differences. The role of augmented feedback will be examined and finally, this work in writing will discuss the observable changes in
Motivating Students to Learn: One of challenging and difficult tasks for teachers and parents is motivating students to complete their classes with a sense of pride, achievement and graduate with their peers. This task is particularly challenging for students who are have been unenthusiastic over time and those who are struggling. As a result of the lack of motivation and prevailing struggles, such students start to demonstrate learned helplessness. Learned helplessness
The most successful training programs are concentrating on the cognitive side of emotions, specifically evaluating how leaders can provide individualized attention and support to help subordinates prioritize tasks, focus their efforts, organize their time and resources and attain a higher level of performance. The transition of managers into leaders is also determined by the level of trust the latter is able to create and sustain through greater authenticity and
0 tool has little to do with its overall effectiveness in getting attaining learning goals and objectives for example. Controlling for the informality or formality of Web 2.0 tools use is required, as many instructors are relying on the conversational and broadcast functionality of social networks as a substitute for e-mail. Still, the informal aspects of social networking applications including Web 2.0 tools and their anticipated benefits as a learning