Medical Ethics And Embryonic Stem Essay

Certainly, there is a period much later in pregnancy where a fetus has developed enough human characteristics and senses to argue in good faith that the fetus is entitled to the same rights as a newborn infant. However, to make that argument on behalf of an undeveloped zygote requires specific logical justification. Instead, the main basis of the concern for the zygote is the religious belief about when human life "begins." The problem with that belief as the basis for public policy is that it violates the fundamental constitutional principle of (1) separation of church and state and (2) equal protection. The belief that human life begins at conception is perfectly legitimate as a personal of religious belief; but it is not an appropriate factor in American law. Recognizing the religious beliefs or definitions in law is a violation of the constitutional rights of every person who does not share...

...

In particular, scientific research in general and medical research on humans in particular are strictly regulated by state and federal law and funding eligibility requirements. Virtually any form of productive scientific and medical research could be misused irresponsibly. However, instead of prohibiting tremendously beneficial research across the board, the sensible approach is simply to design appropriate objective guidelines to apply existing principles of medical ethics and law on every emerging area of scientific and medical research. The alternative approach would have prohibited some of the medical treatments that are now considered routine, such as open-heart surgery, organ transplantation, and intrauterine surgery to save the life of a fetus.

Cite this Document:

"Medical Ethics And Embryonic Stem" (2009, August 15) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/medical-ethics-and-embryonic-stem-19937

"Medical Ethics And Embryonic Stem" 15 August 2009. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/medical-ethics-and-embryonic-stem-19937>

"Medical Ethics And Embryonic Stem", 15 August 2009, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/medical-ethics-and-embryonic-stem-19937

Related Documents

Embryonic Stem Cell Research The use of human embryonic stem cells in scientific research has held great promise for some but this research has also produced powerful objections from others. Indeed, there is a profound if sometimes vehemently expressed moral argument that emerges from embryonic stem cell research. The principal objections to the use of these stem cells has come from evangelicals, conservative Christians and others who equate using embryonic stem

Although these stem cells are only a few years old, they possess unlimited potential in terms of clinical research. Specifically, scientists are focusing their potential uses in transplant medicine in order to significantly reduce the level of both infections and overall organ rejection in organ transplant surgery. The potential for using stem cells is of vast clinical and medical importance. These cells could potentially allow scientists to learn what occurs

In avoiding the current controversy on the morality of embryonic stem cell research, researchers and doctors have resorted to other options (Dobson 2004, National Review 2004). Substitutes like adult stem cells and somatic cell nuclear transfer from placental or umbilical cord stem cells of newborns. Adult stem cells, however, were found to be nearly not as malleable as human embryonic stem cells or those acquired through somatic cell nuclear

" He argues that it is wrong to use these embryos even though they will just be discarded and wasted anyway. For this reason, people with grave diseases and disabilities argue that Bush needs to change his stance. CONCLUSION Stem cell research is incredibly important and should be fully examined so that we can do as much as possible to find cures and alleviate human suffering (Feinstein, 2004). It is important that

This is (still, for the present time, at least), the law on medical procedures to terminate pregnancy, which are available (and eligible for federal funding assistance) to anyone whose personal religious beliefs allow them. Those whose religious beliefs prohibit abortion at any time after conception need never contemplate the procedure, but their religious position is not incorporated into U.S. law. Like abortion, Americans not opposed to stem cell research

The ban needs to be used to prevent the sale of embryos, use of cloning and the production of embryos for the sole purpose of research. Cures for debilitating diseases will hopefully result and healing is supposed to be the driving factor in medicine. It is a poor argument to talk of murder, destruction and disrespect of human life when the United States continues to utilize capital punishment, the