Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
The concept of patient autonomy, as opposed to medial paternity, is one that has gained much ground in recent years; "... about 30 years ago, issues began to appear that were difficult to solve using traditional ethics. New medical and reproductive technologies, research controversies, and a societal ethos that questioned all authority posed difficult questions." (Czaplyski, Larry, 2002)
At issue in this paper is the meaning and significance of patient autonomy and the way in which is relates to medical paternity. As the discussion will outline, the case for patient autonomy is not only ethically valid but also essential for the moral and practical balance in the medical profession. Underlying this view is the fact that the issue of patient autonomy does not exist in isolation or in the medical field alone - but relates to other issues and ethical problems in the society at large. These larger issues refer to various forms of control and authoritarianism which act against personal liberty and freedom.
The argument will centre on two imperatives. Firstly, that patient autonomy is an inalienable right and is ethically related to freedom of choice and freedom of speech. The second reason for upholding patient autonomy focuses on the fact that the practice of modern medicine has tended to become increasingly more clinical and mechanical and imposes itself on the patient through the force and status of science. This has resulted in an unhealthy patient-doctor relationship and the distancing of the patient and medical practitioner. In this respect patient autonomy is seen as not only ethically valid but as a necessary counterweight to achieve an open and balanced relationship between the patient and the health practitioner.
The concept of and motivation for patient autonomy is best understood by understanding the meaning of the term medical paternity. Paternity is a concept that is allied to a wider and predominantly contemporary problem, namely the world wide reaction against forms of control and dominance from persons, associations or groups that are not transparent and open in their dealings. The term paternalism carries with it many loaded meanings based on restriction and control, particularly pertaining to information. The term has been deconstructed in many spheres, including the field of medicine. This deconstruction aims at exposing the hidden layers of hegemony and biased authoritarianism that the term implies.
Although there may be disagreement on how to define the term "paternalism," there seems to be an origin of paternalism other than that from the physician which can affect the degree of autonomy which a patient can express. In my view, paternalism is a parental form of direction or order to the patient to the effect that "we know what is best, you may not understand it but follow what we say." This kind I think originates from institutions within our social or political environment. (Bernstein Maurice, 2004)
The definition of patient autonomy on the other hand counters the tendency of paternalism to dominate and control by insisting on "the right of patients to make decisions about their medical care without their health care provider trying to influence the decision. Patient autonomy does allow for health care providers to educate the patient but does not allow the health care provider to make the decision for the patient. (MedicineNet: Patient autonomy) more precise definition which hints at the complexities and possible ambiguities involved in the term 'patient autonomy' is the following:
Thus, patient autonomy refers to the capability and right of patients to control the course of their own medical treatment and participate in the treatment decision-making process. Today, case law and the courts define the legal limits of patient autonomy, usually framed under the rubric of informed consent. (Healthcare Ethics, 2004)
The idea of informed consent is an area that often arises in debates on patient autonomy. This term refers to the concern that the issue of autonomy must take account of those patients who are not adequately informed or knowledgeable, or who are not in a position to make decisions. This obvious and important point which, however, should not be allowed to obscure the central issue which is not the degree of patient autonomy but rather an essential element in the medical arena. A definition that points to…[continue]
"Patient Autonomy" (2004, October 05) Retrieved December 6, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/patient-autonomy-176335
"Patient Autonomy" 05 October 2004. Web.6 December. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/patient-autonomy-176335>
"Patient Autonomy", 05 October 2004, Accessed.6 December. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/patient-autonomy-176335
3). How does a caregiver justify making decisions such as those mentioned above, decisions that are based on the caregiver's values and beliefs? Harris is very clear in this regard that these issues are both moral and philosophical, and the real problem is in how the issues are resolved and based on what standards and morals. It's not merely about understanding the "natural of moral problems," John Harris explains (p.
This step would also require an assessment of the various "what-if" outcomes that might result from sharing the genetic information with the mother only, both the mother and the father, or neither of them. Step Four Based on the foregoing considerations, the physician would appear to have an ethical responsibility to share his discovery with the mother, but the decision to share this information with the father should be at the
Merrill, in the UK. Following his experience with heart surgery using innovating surgical techniques, the physician noted the problems he experienced in understanding all of his alternatives compared to a simpler earlier procedure, and finally trusted to the advice of his cardiologist to surgically intervene. In response to the experience, Dr. Merrill emphasized that, "As a physician talking to colleagues, I had the best information possible under the circumstances.
Paternalism can take a number of forms. Unfortunately, because of the governments increasing amount of interaction and funding of the medical industry, governmental paternalism can take the form of limiting funding, which affects treatment options. This form of paternalism is destructive to the health care industry, and is rarely helpful. This form of paternalism also assumes that the government or funding agency knows more about the well-being of my patient
Moreover, a hospital employee who saw Mrs. Edwards and the treatment that she was given could have understood that he or she is the only thing standing between the patient and probable death. By having Chantal as a nurse attending Mrs. Edwards the hospital staff failed to think about how the relationship between the two women made it difficult for the former to look at the situation from an
Patient Access to Experimental Drugs Experimental drugs are being used in treating cancer and other life-threatening diseases in the hopes that effective cures and treatments can be identified. There are however, ethical questions relating to the use of experimental drugs and this work seeks to answer the question that asks whether patients should have access to experimental drugs and to answer why or why they should not have this access. Experimental Drugs Experimental
This caring paradigm goes far beyond any one individual nurse and produces acts of caring that transcend any one theory and become associated with a greater good -- holism and non-judgmental care (Watson, 1989, 32). Ethics- the power of Watson is that she does not see humans in a vacuum, but as the compilation of many different experiences that work to enrich and enliven their lives, but that cannot ever