Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formattingExcerpt from Term Paper:
Tragedy in Art
The newspapers are forever mentioning the word, 'tragedy'. It usually means that there has been a death or deaths associated with a catastrophic event. Surprisingly, this is in keeping with the use of tragedy as described by Aristotle: that it should evoke the emotions of pity and fear in the presence of an action of a certain magnitude. Pablo Picasso's 1937 mural, Guernica: Testimony of War, is the epitome of tragedy in art as described by David Hume in his essay, Of Tragedy.
Hume expresses the belief that tragedy may be seen within art through the experience of passion, spirit, uneasiness and a certain pleasure brought about by an understanding of the symbolic aesthetic. He states, "The whole art of the poet is employed in rousing and supporting the compassion and indignation, the anxiety and resentment of his audience. They are pleased in proportion as they are afflicted, and never are so happy as when they employ tears, sobs, and cries to give vent to their sorrow, and relieve their heart, swollen with the tenderest sympathy and compassion" (Hume Internet source).
The mural is based on an incident that happened in 1934. Hitler had come to the aid of Francisco Franco by sending planes to destroy the non-military village of Guernica in Spain's Basque region. The entire town was decimated by the three hour siege. "Picasso found himself interested not so much in what the bombing and burning of Guernica meant politically, but rather what they meant in metaphor, what they meant in the context of individual human lives. He wanted to address emotively the destruction of his beloved country, and he already possessed a personal visual language with which to do so, one anchored in the violence, suffering, and passion of the bullring, as well as in the centuries-old Spanish belief in the essential tragedy of life, one embodied by the figure of a grieving woman, La Llorona" (Martin 38).
David Hume says that art that depicts tragedy must contain an element of liveliness - either in the execution, composition or emotional response. This painting may be said to be 'lively' in all three areas. "Guernica's visual imagery -- a screaming horse which had fallen, pierced by a lance; a wailing woman holding a dead child in her arms; another woman, her clothes on fire, attempting to escape from a burning building; the severed head of a soldier -- spoke not specifically to a terrible day in Spain. Rather, it spoke to the horrors that humans have visited on each other for millennia, and because of this the painting began to symbolize the reality of every war remarkably soon after its creation" (Martin 38). The visual representation, done in an abstract style, brings the viewer into the 'action' of the painting. Upon the body of a man tread all manner of monsters, some with the face of man, others of animals. The man on the bottom holds a chipped knife. The feeling is that the knife has been used, though there is no indication of blood.
A bull stands to the left (facing the painting), nostrils extended and eyes distended. One eye looks to the carnage and the mourners while the other stares at and, perhaps, past the viewer. The head of a horse rages, the extra horn of a unicorn protruding from his mouth. The shape of an eye holds within it a light bulb and light that reaches only for a short time out of the space.
Hooves and feet are congregated toward the front. Bodies and pieces of bodies - animal and human - seem to be massed together in the middle while floating faces enter to the right. In front of the bull a mother holds her dead child, her mouth posed in the act of screaming.
Light is involved in the portrayal f action to the right while the darkness of the bull's body provides a background for the mother and child. The 'texture brought about by such graphic images is two-dimensional only if the transition to the mind's eye is not counted. The viewer becomes fully involved, even to the point of distress. It is altogether "disagreeable, afflicting, melancholy, disordered" as Hume has suggested is necessary (Internet source).
The basic foundation of the creative process is to be able to discover new and unique solutions, to be able to observe and…[continue]
"Philosophy Of Art David Hume" (2004, March 29) Retrieved November 29, 2016, from http://www.paperdue.com/essay/philosophy-of-art-david-hume-165511
"Philosophy Of Art David Hume" 29 March 2004. Web.29 November. 2016. <http://www.paperdue.com/essay/philosophy-of-art-david-hume-165511>
"Philosophy Of Art David Hume", 29 March 2004, Accessed.29 November. 2016, http://www.paperdue.com/essay/philosophy-of-art-david-hume-165511
"that the author of nature is somewhat similar to the mind of man; though possessed of much larger faculties, proportioned to the grandeur of the work, which he has executed," indicating that there is existence of Deity who has similarity to man but us more apportioned to the deeds and the works of His hands. 7. How is anthropomorphism used in relation to the argument? Anthropomorphism is used in relation to
Hume and Montesquieu David Hume and Baron de Montesquieu were two of the Enlightenment Era's most famed philosophers. These two men had remarkably innovative ideas regarding the subject of commerce, which were very similar in many ways, yet different in others. Renowned philosopher David Hume's Political Discourses essays presented an argument against the mercantilist theory, which insisted on retaining money only in one's own country (Penelhaum, 1995). Hume's gold-flow theory argued that
James believed that belief in God could be contemplated in terms of "live and dead hypotheses" (James 2010). He argues that when one is trying to find an argument for God existing or God not existing, we must consider three things: 1) Living or dead 2) Forced or unavoidable; and, 3) Momentous or trivial. He says, "and for our purposes we may call an option a genuine option when it
This psychological egalitarianism was how he differed from many of the economists of his day. He did not make a distinction between the different classes of men, but believed that all men look for happiness, which included action and pleasure. Hume's historical viewpoint included the realization that changes in economic life resulting from the expansion of trade carried with them changed demands on the entire population, and in the case of
Wulf, S.J. (2000). "The skeptical life in Hume's political thought. Polity, 33(1), 77. Wulf uses David Hume's well-known skepticism to advance his concerning the extreme degrees to which philosophy had been taken before returning to less radical modes. He develops material about the antithetical ideas to those investigated here; that is, he puts into a context the ideas of those philosophers who, working at the edge of the intelligible, refused to
Jean-Francois Lyotard (the Postmodern condition: A Knowledge Report 1979) describes postmodernism in the context of nature of social bond. He argues that due to the advent of the technology and with the invention of computer, information has been more restricted in the form of procedures and program. According to him some one must have access to all the information to check whether the decisions are madder correctly. He discuss in
Thus, Sam argues that although the world often seems unjust (and is filled with innumerable instances of evil), yet P. is solved through the belief that every condition (good, in this case) necessitates an equal and opposite condition (evil, as it were.) However, Gretchen counters by asking whether those who behave in an evil way are ever punished for their transgressions, and whether there is any motivation for people to