Criminal Justice Police Policy Effectiveness Term Paper

Criminal Justice

Police Policy Effectiveness

Police policy effectiveness and organizational effectiveness are tied together. Often, departments implement polices that are meant to control and prevent crime, but also ensure the continued survival of the organization, including the administration and support elements of the organization. This organizational behavior is not always a detriment to the department and policing goals, but it can be. The department must always evaluate the organizational goals, and make sure they support the transitive goals, or environmental impact of a situation or policy. For example, if a directed patrol system increases crime prevention and utilizes officers more effectively, it is a positive system both transitively and reflexively. However, many systems actually support the organization rather than the environment they are hoping to support. Thus, a policy can be effective, but an organization can be ineffective, or vice versa.

In the Langworthy article, the auto theft sting was not an effective police strategy, because it did not support the transitive goals of the organization, and it was costly as well. There were actually more cars stolen during the sting operation than in the same time frame the previous year. While much stolen property was discovered, the public's perception of the police department and their ethics may have been damaged by the sting operation, and as the study notes, it can also actually lead to more organized crime groups, retaliatory violence, and even overzealous policing (Langworthy, 1989, pg. 43). Thus, this may forward the organizational goals of the department to solve more crimes and recover more stolen cars, but in this case, the sting operation really backfired. It cost more to complete than in the vehicles recovered, and the police department got a bad public perception because of the sting. The organization did not weigh the disadvantages of the policy, and so, it was a bad policy decision that cost the organization in the end, in both perception and function.

References

Langworthy, R.H. (1989). Do stings control crime? An evaluation of a police fencing operation. Justice Quarterly, Vol. 6 No. 1, 27-45.

Cite this Document:

"Criminal Justice Police Policy Effectiveness" (2007, October 23) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-police-policy-effectiveness-34931

"Criminal Justice Police Policy Effectiveness" 23 October 2007. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-police-policy-effectiveness-34931>

"Criminal Justice Police Policy Effectiveness", 23 October 2007, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/criminal-justice-police-policy-effectiveness-34931

Related Documents

Policing Policies Analysis This study seeks to strengthen the practice of policing by demonstrating the effectiveness of the problem-oriented policing. The information provided herein is useful to practitioners as it compares problem-oriented policing against community-oriented policing. Practitioners will be able to create much robust policing intervention when addressing real life situations within the field by grasping the theoretical mechanisms (Hess & Orthmann, 2011). In addition, by linking academic theories to policing,

Criminal justice administration mainly focuses on crime prevention and punishing any illegal activities. Criminal justice administration is wide and it entails law enforcement and the judicial administration. Some of the jobs that relate to criminal justice administration include; security coordination, juvenile delinquency administration, law enforcement and being a courtroom official. Additional crime is also part of criminal justice administration. This field entails terrorism prevention, immigration policies and social policies. Other

Criminal Justice Management Mapping Crime Hotspots to Deter Crime Reducing crime is a constant concern of law enforcement and community leaders. Police strategies for reducing crime rely heavily on deterrence, in the form of police patrols (reviewed by Koper, 1995, p. 649-650). Research has shown that a police presence reminds offenders and potential offenders of the certainty of punishment, which is a more effective deterrent than the promised severity of a punishment.

Criminal Justice: The Death Penalty Reasons for topic selection Causes of racial prejudice and discrimination Juvenile in delinquent society theory Culture and values Official and unofficial values The effectiveness of the death penalty The death penalty is irreversible The death penalty is barbaric Changes to the death sentence Implemented changes Sentencing guidelines Bifurcated trials Automatic appellate conviction review Proportionality review The importance of proposed changes Anticipated outcome Life imprisonment; alternative to death sentences The costs Decency standards Overall efficiency Policies in support of incarceration Conclusion References Background Despite the controversy over how effective it is

Under the stewardship of Police Commissioner Howard Safir, the NYPD began analyzing daily crime statistics collected from its 40,000 officers throughout the five boroughs of New York City and generating computer modeling of crime trends in a system dubbed CompStat that allowed the accurate identification of crime trends with pinpoint accuracy, often permitting nearly as precise predictive modeling via extrapolation (Safir, 2003). The other main benefit and purpose of CompStat

Criminal Justice: Challenges and Developments The criminal justice system in the United States, and indeed anywhere in the world, is a governmental tool to ensure the safety and security of the citizens of the country. Certain areas have however been considered in research to steer away from this goal. The public has for example lost a considerable amount of trust in the system as a result of apparent oppressive practices in