Prejudice and Stereotyping Are Not New to Essay

Download this Essay in word format (.doc)

Note: Sample below may appear distorted but all corresponding word document files contain proper formatting

Excerpt from Essay:

Prejudice and stereotyping are not new to society, but alert students (and others who are educated as to the dangers of prejudice) should beware of falling into stereotyping that unfairly passes judgment on others who are not like us. Thesis: While it is nearly impossible for people to avoid placing certain groups and individuals into strict stereotypical categories, nevertheless honest, thoughtful people recognize and avoid the injustices perpetrated by stereotyping.

Prejudice - ONE

Prejudice: In Chapter 6 the authors point out that prejudice involves "…a negative attitude toward individuals based on their membership in a particular group." In the New York Times-owned online resource,, the authors describe prejudice as a "…baseless and usually negative attitude" toward group members, and it is often the result of stereotyping a group or person (Cherry, 2011). One way in which people arrive at prejudicial feelings is by minimizing "…the differences between people within groups" and by exaggerating "the differences between groups" (Cherry). The human mind tends to need to think "…with the aid of categories," according to psychologist Gordon Allport; and once humans form those categories, they then are "the basis for normal prejudgment" (Cherry).

Discrimination: Chapter 6 explains that discrimination is basically a "negative behavior toward individuals or groups" and those negative behaviors are based on certain attitudes and beliefs about those people or groups. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) goes deeper into the definition, and includes fact sheets for each one of the following areas that experience discriminatory actions or attitudes. They are: age, disability, equal pay, genetic information, national origin, pregnancy, race or color, religion, retaliation, sex, and sexual harassment. The EEOC describes sex-based discrimination as treating another person "…unfavorably because of that person's sex"; or, treating someone with harassment through the use of "unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors" that may create a hostile work environment (EEOC). In the case of racial discrimination, it may involve harassment with racial slurs, or preventing a person of a certain ethnicity from being hired simply based on the person's race or ethnicity (EEOC).

Stereotype: when a person is stereotyped, it is a form of discrimination and prejudice. Nadra Nittle writes in that stereotypes are certain qualities that are assigned to groups of people linked to those people's "…race, nationality and sexual orientation" (Nittle, 2012). In fact stereotypes at the most basic level are "…oversimplifications of people groups" and they can be "widely circulated in certain societies" (Nittle). In the U.S., for example, Asian-American students are often stereotyped as being really good at math, so it is clear that stereotypes are not always mean spirited albeit they are usually unfair. But they can be very mean-spirited and even vicious. For example, Islamic terrorists use stereotypes to promote hatred towards Americans and Western Europeans by saying that all Americans and Western Europeans are "infidels" and because of that they should all be killed.

In-group vs. out-group: Susan Whitbourne explains that baseball fans are "…identical in their passion, their drive, and their devotion…" to their teams. But there are noticeable in-groups and out-groups. Red Sox fans in Boston believe that Yankee fans in New York are "disturbed" and likewise, Yankee fans believe there is something very disturbed about Red Sox fans. In Boston, Red Sox fans are the in-group and Yankee fans are the "out-group"; the Yankee fan is the in-group in New York and of course those crazy Red Sox fans are the out-group in New York (Whitbourne). Not all in-group / out-group examples are sports fans of course. Whitbourne offers the example of a pedestrian crossing a street on a crosswalk, which it the legal and proper way to cross a street. In the process of crossing the street the pedestrian stops briefly to text a friend on his cell phone. The drivers in cars waiting for the pedestrian to cross are impatient once they see the pedestrian texting; one could say the texting pedestrian is the "in-group" because he or she has control of the situation and has forced drivers to stop. The drivers, meanwhile, are in the "out-group" because unless they wish to commit homicide and run the pedestrian down, they are out of luck for the moment.

Prejudice -- TWO

The social cognitive origins of prejudicial and stereotypes are based on a number of factors, according to Chapter 6 (p. 74-75). One of the origins of prejudice and stereotype is based on how humans receive information and process information cognitively. The authors say that because information is received and processed through cognition, generalizations about what humans see and perceive are bound to occur.

It may be unfair, but presenting "categories" of groups or events aid the individual in terms of saving "cognitive energy and allowing us to process more information" (75). Having those categories established allows a person to make decisions later -- and not have to begin all over fresh making judgments and adjusting behaviors accordingly.

What is in-group favoritism? In the PubMed website (part of the National Center for Biotechnical Information, the National Library of Medicine, and the National Institutes of Health) the authors say that a "central aspect of human behavior" is to favor one group over another (Fu, et al., 2012). People are known to offer assistance to groups that they are familiar with more so than groups they are not in touch with or familiar with; it's human nature. In Chapter 6 (p. 75) the authors add that the tendency to show favoritism to one's own group is universal and stands up to research in that regard.

Out-group homogeneity effect: The tendency to view out-groups as "…more homogeneous, or less variable, than in-groups" is the description of the out-group homogeneity effect. In research programs, it has been shown that "…over and above any overall in-group preferences," that is, rating your own group more positively than out-groups, in research studies the out-group was judged "…more stereotypically than the in-groups" (Judd, et al., 2010). Social Inequalities are actually based on a stratification system that is based on justifying stereotypes and prejudices (Chapter 6, pp. 77-78). Part of that stratification is a result of groups competing for resources such as jobs, clean environments, good schools, etc. For example if an immigrant family (with 7 children) from Mexico moves into a traditionally African-American neighborhood, that small park that had been used primarily by black families must now be shared with the new neighbors.

Which of these categories is most significant in our society and in my neighborhood? I believe in-group favoritism is more powerful than any of the other categories. People are drawn to others like them; political progressives support President Obama's efforts and so that politically active group tends to socialize with each other because conservatives are the out-group. Moreover, since there is currently dramatic polarization between conservatives and progressives, both groups are suspicious of each other and see each other as contemptible.

Prejudice -- THREE

The influences that promote stereotyping are often based on a person's family and cultural setting. White people in many instances tend to see themselves as a notch above African-Americans and Latinos; in many cases this prejudice and use of stereotyping is culturally learned. The consequences of stereotyping can be seen as racist, and can lead to bigotry that is passed on from one generation to another. This behavior is destructive to the future of the American society as a whole, and can poison relations between Americans just because of different cultural ethnicities and values. Reducing prejudice can be done through contact between groups. Sports teams with diverse cultures work together for a common goal. And that same concept can be repeated in business and social situations. There are notable theories that show when two groups (that traditionally see others as out-groups) have social contact with each other, tensions…[continue]

Some Sources Used in Document:


Cite This Essay:

"Prejudice And Stereotyping Are Not New To" (2013, June 30) Retrieved October 26, 2016, from

"Prejudice And Stereotyping Are Not New To" 30 June 2013. Web.26 October. 2016. <>

"Prejudice And Stereotyping Are Not New To", 30 June 2013, Accessed.26 October. 2016,

Other Documents Pertaining To This Topic

  • Prejudice Human Beings Engage in

    In terms of explicit prejudice, the aftermath of the Holocaust and the subsequent development of psychological theories of prejudice demonstrate the importance of social pressure in deterring explicit prejudices. Explicit prejudice is essentially the blatant expression of implicit prejudices, because all explicit behaviors ultimately have their root in implicit attitudes and ideologies. By increasing social pressure against explicit examples of prejudice, it becomes easier to confront the implicit prejudices

  • Stereotypes Practitioners of Certain Religions Have Faced

    Stereotypes Practitioners of certain religions have faced prejudiced and stereotyped ideas about the personages because of the negative affiliations of their religion. Perhaps no religion is as stereotyped as the religion called Islam. Islam, antithetically to what the majority of ignorant people believe, is "a religion of ethics, obedience, harmony, and is based on a faithful belief system" (Hossain). It is a religion that promotes peace and the toleration of others.

  • Stereotypes We Are All Guilty of Judging

    Stereotypes We are all guilty of judging others based on a wide range of traits we perceive in them. In so doing, we end up attaching (wrongly) certain traits to such individuals. In this text, I concern myself with stereotyping, its meaning, and the effects it has on those who experience it. Common Stereotypes According to Schneider (2005), "stereotypes are qualities perceived to be associated with particular groups or categories of people." In

  • Stereotyping and Predujice Discrimination Stereotyping and Prejudice...

    Stereotyping and Predujice Discrimination Stereotyping and Prejudice Discrimination Definition and differences between stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination Discrimination, prejudice, and stereotype in many cases are used correspondingly in day-to-day conversations. However, when we have a close examination at these words, we can define and describe them distinctively: we can define stereotypes as ideas that are oversimplified about certain groups of persons. Prejudice is the feeling and thought directed towards these subject groups while discrimination

  • Stereotype and Prejudice the Effects

    The current study investigates two questions: a) do positive self-affirmations influence the likelihood of individuals holding prejudicial and stereotypical beliefs? And b) are suggested self-concepts projected onto others who are often stereotyped? It is hypothesized that positive self-affirmations will result in reduced stereotypical and prejudice beliefs. It is also hypothesized that positive self-concepts (high intelligence) through suggestion will result in the projection of these concepts onto others that are often

  • Stereotypes Story Putnam County Fla Three

    Stereotypes STORY PUTNAM COUNTY, Fla. -- Three days after a woman was shot and killed by an armed robber, deputies released a composite sketch of a possible suspect. On Friday afternoon, Summer Smith was shot and killed during a robbery. "She's gone now from us," said Smith's fiance, Clint Horvatt, who was in the car with the victim when she was shot. Standing in front of the sheriff's office, Horvatt held a flier with his

  • Stereotype Stereotyping The Reciprocity of

    They feared difference, lacked an understanding of my culture and used stereotypes as an excuse to keep me isolated within the company. This was an organization where I find myself unable to remain for any lengthy period of time. It was also an extremely important moment of revelation with regard to the way that I approach others, particularly those who are in some manner different from me. I was now

Read Full Essay
Copyright 2016 . All Rights Reserved