Sign Up Now
Get instant access to over 1 million+ study documents
OR
Already registered? click here to login
By creating your account, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and student honor code.
Academic Freedom
Professors have been accused in recent years of indoctrinating rather than educating, of failing to provide balanced perspectives on controversial issues, of creating a hostile learning environment for conservative or religious students, and of injecting irrelevant political asides into class discussion and as such the statement is ostensibly meant to address the very real issues surrounding faculty classroom conduct that have arisen of late (O'Connor). As a result of these objections, many are calling for the limitation of educators and their freedom in teaching what they feel is relevant or effective. Many believe that professors jobs should be standardized so that there is a universal curriculum is offered and all students are taught the same material across the board. This would prohibit instructors from offering opinioned material or indoctrinating students into one opinion or another.
Despite the objections to academic freedom which might be justified in rare cases, there is no way to teach critical thinking without some leeway to teach what students are interested in and to research ideas independently. If students are only provided summaries of debates in academia, then there is not much opportunity...
One of the central purposes of higher education is to challenge students to think hard about their own perspectives and their own reasoning through logic and evidence. Thus it is difficult to teach such an investigation through a standardized curriculum.
Body
We would be blinking at reality if we failed to acknowledge that recent challenges to "freedom in the classroom" are being advanced to further a particular political agenda; this is not the first time that universities have been suspected of harboring faculties who undermine established institutions and prevailing social values (Finkin, Post and Nelson). The recent calls to limit academic freedom are just that, the academic world is being subject to many of the mainstream ideologies that are present in the public. Even if there is a scientific consensus surrounding any academic topic, such as climate change or evolution, if the position of the consensus does not agree with certain ideologies then there will be calls for reform to "teach the controversy" (Meyer).
Refutation
The refutation takes up the right's…
Works Cited
Baruba, M. "Freedom to Teach." 11 September 2007. Inside Higher ED. Online. 7 April 2013.
Finkin, M., et al. "Freedom in the Classroom." June 2007. American Association of University Professors. Online. 6 April 2013.
Meyer, S. "Teach the Controversy." 30 March 2002. Center for Science and Culture. Online. 7 April 2013.
O'Connor, E. "AAUP To Critics: What, Us Biased?" 25 September 2007. Minding the Campus. Online. 7 April 2013.
In fact, the Court distinguished between Pickering's rights as citizen and his rights as an employee of an institution. Subsequent related Supreme Court decisions have continued to distinguish between an employee's rights as a citizen vs. The member of an institution (243). 2. What requirements must be observed in the awarding of rank, tenure, and salaries? "Wide discretion" is offered to public and private institutes of higher learning regarding the awarding
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION plays an important role in the doctrines of human liberty. However not every country grants this right to its citizens. There are many countries in the world where freedom of expression is still a contentious issue and which have been categorized by Freedom House as not being entirely free. The United States of America is one country where the constitution gives every American the freedom of speech
1) Quite certainly, this speaks to one of the most fundamental flaws in the implementation of new management fads at the academic level. Pondiscio makes the suggestion that this is often viewed apart from the goal of raising academic standards, improving methods of pedagogy or exploring novel ways of stimulating interest at the curricular level. The assumption that only broad and sweeping change derived from external sources can bring about
Caselaw.findlaw.com);in Guiles v. Marineau (2006) (No. 05-0327 2nd Cir. Court) the Court of Appeals ruled that the school "violated a student's free speech" by disciplining him for wearing a T-shirt that criticized George W. Bush and used images of drugs and alcohol (www.NSBA.org);Roberts alluded to Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier (No. 86-836) (484 U.S. 260) (1988), in which a student newspaper was censored because of an article on pregnancy, as justification for
Science has become a dominant facet of modern society and has to a large extent replaced the guiding role of religion. Therefore, science has a great responsibility to ensure that research freedom is not irresponsibly applied. This has resulted in numerous debates on subjects such as science and the environment and modern cloning. This in turn has raised the question whether scientific freedom is always ethical. There is a
Intellectual Freedom in Libraries In today's academic world intellectual freedom is a very important issue. In this paper various factors which are affecting intellectual freedom have been discussed along with efforts that need to be made in order to make the access of information possible for all. The issues being faced mainly by the librarians regarding the protection of confidential information of the library users have also been discussed in this