Airport Security Law Research Paper

Related Topics:

Airport Security Law: Airport security is one of the major issues that have emerged in today's society for travelers across the globe. It is a major issue because of the increase in insecurity, especially with the increase in global terrorism. Actually, global terrorism has been a problem for air travelers and airlines despite enhanced security measures at airports. The events of 9/11 attacks highlighted the various security risks that airports face and demonstrated that the adopted the security initiatives were not enough to protect airlines and airline travelers. Generally, airport security can be described as methods and techniques used to safeguard staff, passengers, and aircraft from harm, accidents, threats, and crime. As a result of the increased security threats across airports, there are several legislative initiatives that have been taken to enhance security. One of the recent aviation laws that relate to airport security is the proposal by U.S. House Democrats to ban loaded guns at airports.

The Airport Security Act of 2013:

The Airport Security Act of 2013 was a proposed by some U.S. House Democrats to ban loaded guns across all airports following the recent killing at Los Angeles International Airport ("Johnson Proposes Loaded Gun Ban," 2013). If enacted into law, the bill would prohibit any individual, except law enforcement personnel and specific officers, from carrying loaded firearms in airport lobbies, terminals, ticket counters, baggage claim sections, and neighboring pick-up and drop-off segments. Notably, passengers who plan to buy or have already bought tickets would be allowed to...


In this case, the combination or key to the lock of the container would solely be in the possession of the specific individual. The proposed legislation would also require airports to post signs that clearly demonstrate that they are gun-free zones.
As previously mentioned, The Airport Security Act of 2013 was drafted after recent killing in Los Angeles International Airport. The suspected shooter i.e. Paul Garcia was violating the law when he carried a loaded firearm to the airport even before he purportedly murdered Gerardo Hernandez, Transportation Security Administration agent and wounded other individuals. His violation of the law by carrying the gun is attributed to the fact that Federal Law forbids passengers from bringing their guns onto airplanes or beyond the security checkpoint (Felde, 2013). In addition, carrying loaded guns in public places is prohibited by California law, where the incident occurred. Since some states have not enacted similar legislation, Georgia's Democrat Congressman, Hank Johnson introduced The Airport Security Act of 2013 to help ensure that all states have adequate airport security measures.

When introducing the bill, Johnson argued that the modern society requires a different look at airports and planes, which are prime targets of terrorism acts. In light of the increased global security issues, it does not make sense that other individuals other than law enforcement personnel and specific officers are allowed to carry loaded firearms within an airport. Therefore, enacting The Airport Security Act of 2013 simply…

Sources Used in Documents:


Felde, K. (2013, November 18). LAX Shooting: Bill Would Ban Guns at All U.S. Airports.

Retrieved February 14, 2014, from

Hampson, R. (2013, November 3). Airport Security Still Vulnerable. USA Today. Retrieved February 14, 2014, from

"Johnson Proposes Loaded Gun Ban at Airports." (2013, November 19). Morris Technology.
Cov News. Retrieved February 14, 2014, from

Cite this Document:

"Airport Security Law" (2014, February 14) Retrieved June 13, 2024, from

"Airport Security Law" 14 February 2014. Web.13 June. 2024. <>

"Airport Security Law", 14 February 2014, Accessed.13 June. 2024,

Related Documents

It is the harsh reality of life in post-9/11 America that the global terror continues to exact a high toll on American lives and interests at home and abroad, and the terrorist agenda continues to include attacks in the future that may involve weapons of mass destruction. Furthermore, these types of diminutions of basic constitutional rights are not unique in American history, and President Lincoln suspended the writ of habeas

Airport Security Design and Implementation The objective of this work in writing is to devise a plan for setting up a state-of-the-art airport security system. This work will discuss: (1) The security force: selection, organization and training; (2) Airport lay-out: suggest a design which maximizes security management efficiency and passenger flow while minimizing discomfort and delay to air travelers; (3) the screening system step-by-step detailing the process, the equipment used and

The physical passage from the entrance hub should consist of a single hallway, as narrow as safety limits will allow and without any branching, to ease the monitoring of movement. This hallway would connect the entrance hub to the main public area of the airport, where shopping and food service establishments would located. Again, this area should be modeled after many existing airports; a large and open area resembling a

Airport Security Policies

Airport Security Policies Few events in life have the potential to impact each and every single member of society, whether it is on a macro (indirect) or micro (direct) level. Even fewer such events actually do impact every single citizen. The Columbine school shootings, the Kent State university shootings, the Oklahoma city bombings, Pearl Harbor, and Vietnam are just a few of the events which are forever embedded into the psyche

Almost 30% of the screened baggage is falsely identified as positive for explosives that require manual screening wasting time for the passengers. Also Lollis (2003) reported that passengers are increasingly complaining about the damage or theft to their personal belongings. A survey conducted by Woodyard and Lollis reported that 63% of passengers felt that airport security is " becoming more of a hassle." [Garrick, 2005] Further, the

Specifically, current definitions and limitations in the area of profiling make it impossible to implement the types of policies and precautions such as those that have proven successful in Israel. According to acknowledged U.S. (Larsen, 2007) and international experts (Hoffman, 2003) in aviation security, the entire approach of screening passengers (1) randomly and (2) only after they set foot onto airport property is not an effective way of preventing