Ambrose/Plagiarism Purdue University's Online Writing Article Review

PAGES
1
WORDS
399
Cite
Related Topics:

Ambrose/Plagiarism

Purdue University's Online Writing Lab (OWL) is a respected resource for writers. In an introduction to its guidelines on plagiarism, it is noted that "There are few intellectual offenses more serious than plagiarism in academic and professional contexts" (Stolley, Brizee, and Paiz, 2013). The serious charges leveled at historian Stephen Ambrose -- that he plagiarized the work of Thomas Childers -- are valid.

Ambrose failed to properly credit Childers for his work. Childers' found a stash of letters and photographs in his grandmother's house and was able to build on the stash with additional information. Ambrose used his friend George McGovern as a primary resource. Although there may have been general similarities in the stories each author heard, recollections would have reflected the unique personalities of the principals involved. Just as no two attendees at a party will have the same accounting of events, the pilots and crews cited in Childers' and Ambrose's books would have likewise had different stories to tell, especially when stories were told years after the events took place.

Ambrose attempted to use a trick most often employed by high school students or college freshmen. He substituted synonyms in someone else's sentences and paragraph structure in an effort to make the writing his own. Ambrose does not use his own words and his own voice in these instances, for the writing still parallels too closely that of the original. In some cases, Ambrose's wording is identical. It is an egregious offence for a writer of Ambrose's caliber and reputation. It is difficult to imagine that Ambrose did not understand what he was doing or comprehend the serious nature of his actions.

According to an article in The Weekly Standard, Childers was gracious about Ambrose's copy-catting, remarking only that he was "disappointed" (Barnes, 2002). There were no comments from Ambrose reported, only a bit of side-stepping from his publisher, who praised Ambrose's work and insisted that all resources were appropriately documented. Unfortunately, that is not the case. Ambrose clearly plagiarized the work of Thomas Childers and, in so doing, forever tarnished his reputation as one of the nation's premier historians and writers.

References

Barnes, F. (2002). Stephen Ambrose, Copycat. The Weekly Standard. Retrieved March 27, 2013,

from http://www.weeklystandard.com/node/2035/atom/feed

Stolley, K., Brizee, A., and Paiz, J.M. (2013). Avoiding plagiarism. Purdue University Online

Writing Lab. Retrieved March 27, 2013, from http://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource

Cite this Document:

"Ambrose Plagiarism Purdue University's Online Writing" (2013, March 27) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ambrose-plagiarism-purdue-university-online-87010

"Ambrose Plagiarism Purdue University's Online Writing" 27 March 2013. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ambrose-plagiarism-purdue-university-online-87010>

"Ambrose Plagiarism Purdue University's Online Writing", 27 March 2013, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/ambrose-plagiarism-purdue-university-online-87010

Related Documents

Software The objective of this study is to consider the issue of plagiarism in a book and to determine how many exactly same words results in drawing the line at plagiarism. This work will additionally consider how many lines of computer code need to be the same to judge that one piece of software is a plagiarized version of another. The work entitled "Hollywood in India: Protecting Intellectual Property (B)" relates

Academic Accountability Define academic voice and plagiarism. Academic voice is a form of communication that uses a formal tone with clarity, professionalism, and straightforwardness. At its core are declarative statements, avoidance of causal language, and authoritative register (Dirgeyasa & Hum, 2017). Plagiarism is the representation of another author’s work or ideas as own and without full acknowledgment. Apply your knowledge of academic voice and plagiarism to the rewritten passage, locating and identifying errors. “The correlational

Original research comes with the need to properly synthesize and paraphrase. There is often the need to present information, but in a way, that shows the reader the researcher understood the information collected. This means putting into one�s own words what the literature stated. For example, if a research article discusses smartphone use affecting sleep in humans, and there is a long passage one would like to use, one can

scored worse than me on this quiz, I still did not attain the sort of results that I would have liked. Thus, there is certainly room for me to improve in my overall knowledge of the American Psychological Association and its stylistic guidelines for communicating with others. One of the most significant points of insight for me after taking this quiz is that I can certainly improve my knowledge

prevent plagiarism were not mentioned? How can you utilize the university's plagiarism and citation resources moving forward to uphold academic integrity? The most helpful resources that could help prevent plagiarism that were not mentioned might be explicit examples of actual student papers that demonstrate each one of the different forms of academic plagiarism. There is probably no need to provide samples of deliberate plagiarism, simply because everybody knows what it

Preventing Plagiarism: A Detailed Action Plan During the assignment writing process, the relevance of other people's ideas, views as well as opinions cannot be overstated. To come up with a concise and balanced research piece, one may be required to draw on the ideas of others from time to time. In this text, I come up with a plan detailing how I will prevent plagiarism in the rest of my program.