Argument In Favor Or Against The Cocaine Evidence Term Paper


¶ … Evidence The case reveals how the police officers have obtained the cocaine evidence by searching a man house without a warrant making the man to be charged for possession of cocaine. Objective of this paper is to argue whether the cocaine evidence against the man is admissible since the police officers search the man's house and obtain the evidence without a warrant.

Argument in Favor of Prosecutor

A warrant refers to a legal order legally signed by a judge authorizing the police to search a specific location or private property of an individual. While the Fourth Amendment stipulates that a police officer requires a warrant to search a home or property of a private citizen, nevertheless, the prosecutor can argue that the police officers do not require a warrant to search the man house, thus, the evidence should be admissible.

The prosecutor can use the stop and risk theory to convince the judge to admit the evidence on the ground...


Thus, the police have a reasonable believe that the man is carrying out a dangerous activity. See the case of Terry v. Ohio, 392 in U.S. 1 (1968). Thus, the police have the right to search the man's home without a warrant. The prosecutor can also use the exigent circumstances theory to convince the judge that the police does not require a warrant to search the man's house because the time taken to obtain the warrant might be long enough to jeopardize the public safety, which can consequently lead to a loss of evidence. Typically, it is visible that the man will destroy the evidence or hide the evidence in another location before the police obtains the warrant. It is critical to understand that the case of cocaine distribution and possession is a serious offense in the United States. Thus, the police believe that the time taken to obtain a warrant before searching the man's home can jeopardize the public safety, in this circumstances, the police officers carry out a search without a warrant.
Argument in Favor of the Man

The man can argue that the Judge should exclude the cocaine from the evidence because the police did not come with a warrant to search his house, which the United States constitution mandates a police officer to obtain before carry…

Sources Used in Documents:


Cornell University Law School (2014). Fourth Amendment. Law School. USA.

Cite this Document:

"Argument In Favor Or Against The Cocaine Evidence" (2015, September 28) Retrieved June 13, 2024, from

"Argument In Favor Or Against The Cocaine Evidence" 28 September 2015. Web.13 June. 2024. <>

"Argument In Favor Or Against The Cocaine Evidence", 28 September 2015, Accessed.13 June. 2024,

Related Documents

What further makes interpretation of results difficult to precisely define quantify is that the amount of drug stores depends on the nature of the drug itself, the duration of the ingestion of the drug, and the composition of the tissue holding the drug and the frequency of use. The greater the incidence of drug use the more permanent the level of toxins and chemicals in tissues throughout the body,

Marijuana, which comes from the Cannabis plant, has been used by people since time immemorial. It was only in the 1960s that this plant received excessive media attention for the effect it had on people and the adverse potential to go wrong. Therefore, the American government illegalized the use of marijuana and anyone found to be in possession of this plant, or to be intoxicated by it, was told to

Needle Exchange Evidence

Exchange Definition of Policy A needle exchange is a harm reduction strategy wherein the program provides clean, unused needles to addicts for the injection of intravenous drugs. The principle is that when addicts do not have access to clean needles, they are far more likely to share needles among themselves. Needle exchanges are typically set up in areas with a high concentration of intravenous drug users. They provide clean, unused needles

Cannabis in the UK: De-Penalisation, Decriminalisation, or Legalisation? In October of 2015, the Parliament of the United Kingdom was forced to debate whether the current prohibition on cannabis should end in some way. "Forced" is the correct word here, because Parliament seems otherwise unwilling to address the issue, but in this case it was obliged by its own policy, whereby any petition signed by at least one hundred thousand people must

U.S. Drug War in Latin

According to the Drug Policy Alliance, the methods used so far were destined to fail. The explanation of the Drug Policy Alliance supporting a statement regarding the uselessness of the eradication method is relaying on the so called "balloon effect." That means that the extermination of crops destined for the production of coca and heroin in one region will determine the increase of production in another region in Latin

Marijuana Recently, Uruguay became the first country to legalize in its entirety and without qualification the marijuana trade. Uruguayan senators spent a total of twelve hours debating the issue, which was proposed by the country's President. The bill was described by its proponents as "an unavoidable response to reality, given that the 'war' on drugs had failed" (BBC, 2013, 1). The law allows registered citizens to buy up to 40g per