Arming Teachers Argumentative Essay

Length: 6 pages Sources: 5 Subject: Argumentative Type: Essay Paper: #77714421 Related Topics: Education, Law Enforcement, Argument, Security
Excerpt from Essay :

Why Teachers Should Not be Armed

Introduction

Often in recent years, school shootings have been followed by public, political debates about guns. One of the arguments from the pro-gun side is that teachers should be armed, in order to help prevent school shootings. Their argument is essentially that teachers are in position already, there in the school, and that they will have opportunities to stop a school shooter long before law enforcement can arrive on the scene and do the same. Their arguments, on the surface, do not sound unreasonable, but when examined more carefully, there are issues with these arguments. Arguments both for and against arming teachers have been examined, and the conclusion is that teachers should not be armed.

The Case for Arming Teachers

The case for arming teachers typically rests on the logic that teachers are in position in the schools, and therefore are a de facto first responder in the event of a school shooting. Their roles as protectors for students should, therefore, extend to being armed so that they can theoretically stop a shooter. These arguments are elaborated on by Sheriff Grady Judd, a member of the school safety commission that investigated the Parkland shooting. Judd points out that the average school shooting is between two and five minutes, and that law enforcement response time is typically over five minutes. As such, law enforcement alone cannot be relied upon to defend students against shooters (Fox, 2019).

There are a few caveats to this argument. The first is that proponents of arming teachers prefer that teachers should be trained. On the surface, this is reasonable and logical – training for all people who handle firearms makes sense. The lack of formal definition for what this training actually entails, and what standards should exist, is part of the problem with this line of argument. Schools, by and large, are run at local levels. In a country where there are no federal standards for law enforcement training, the idea that there would be reliable federal standards for teacher firearm training is implausible. Thus, trained teachers would in practice have a wide range of training, ranging from basic firearms handling to more advanced training.

Faster Saves Lives is a group that trains teachers to shoot to kill. However, even with that sort of training, there are other barriers to assuming that this will move the needle in defending students. First, training and real life experience are two entirely different things. When faced with automatic gunfire, and a rapidly evolving situation, people without experience in combat or law enforcement are unlikely to respond the same way. Indeed, the data shows that even law enforcement officers, with a much higher degree of training and experience, do not shoot accurately in a crisis encounter (Kirk, 2018).

Second, there are some fundamental problems with this model. First, there is a shortage of such training, and funding for it. Most teachers make little money and yet would have to cover the cost of this training, or the cost of acquiring a firearm and any relevant permits, themselves, which would create a barrier to implementation of the plan (Willis, 2019). Many districts have rejected the idea on purely…and this is one of those situations. This is not to say that teachers cannot be armed, just that they should not be armed as if they are responsible for keeping the school safe. That is a job of trained security professionals.

Conclusions

Teachers should not be armed in response to school shootings. Most teachers neither want this responsibility nor are equipped to bear it. They are not soldiers or police and should not be treated as such. Even with firearms training, there is no evidence to support the idea that teachers will be effective deterrants, or be able to shoot accurately enough to actually stop a shooter. Even if we conceded the point that occasionally a teacher can perform this role, and therefore there would be some reduction in school shooting deaths as a result of arming teachers, there are other, better solutions, and there are costs related to reduction in the quality of education, which is the primary objective of schools.

Schools should focus on educating students, and that should be the role of teachers as well. If security needs to be enhanced, trained security personnel should be utilized, rather than ill-equipped and ill-prepared teachers, most of whom want nothing to do with playing the security role. Measures to reduce the ability of shooters to do mass harm will be more effective than arming teachers at reducing death and injury due to school shootings. Thus, arming teachers probably will not solve the problem posed by school shooters, will definitely have negative effects, and is basically a political red herring used to distract from the more effective solution…

Sources Used in Documents:

References

Education Week (2018) Should teachers carry guns? The debate, explained. Education Week. Retrieved April 28, 2019 from https://www.edweek.org/ew/issues/arming-teachers.html

Fox 13 News Staff (2019) Arming teachers: A sheriff’s perspective. Fox 5. Retrieved April 28, 2019 from http://www.fox5ny.com/news/arming-teachers-sheriffs-perspective

Kirk, M. (2018) What research says about arming teachers. CityLab. Retrieved April 28, 2019 from https://www.citylab.com/life/2018/03/what-the-research-says-about-arming-teachers/555545/

Newkirk, V. (2018) Arming educators violates the spirit of the second amendment. The Atlantic. Retrieved April 28, 2019 https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2018/02/the-absurdity-of-armed-educators/553961/

Willis, J. (2019) When you give a teacher a gun. GQ.com. Retrieved April 28, 2019 from https://www.gq.com/story/when-you-give-a-teacher-a-gun



Cite this Document:

"Arming Teachers Argumentative" (2019, April 28) Retrieved September 23, 2021, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/arming-teachers-argumentative-essay-2173788

"Arming Teachers Argumentative" 28 April 2019. Web.23 September. 2021. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/arming-teachers-argumentative-essay-2173788>

"Arming Teachers Argumentative", 28 April 2019, Accessed.23 September. 2021,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/arming-teachers-argumentative-essay-2173788

Purpose of Paperdue.com

The documents we provide are to be used as a sample, template, outline, guideline in helping you write your own paper, not to be used for academic credit. All users must abide by our "Student Honor Code" or you will be restricted access to our website.

Related Documents
Arming Teachers in Schools
Words: 1723 Length: 6 Pages Topic: Management Paper #: 22269399

Should Guns Be Permitted on College Campuses? The continued spate of school shootings indicates that more needs to be done to help protect people on campuses. While there is always a chorus of voices who proclaim that guns should be banned, the fact that the Constitution guarantees people the right to bear arms is one that has to be acknowledged. Considering that this right is important to many Americans, one solution

Arming School Personnel Reasons Against
Words: 1586 Length: 5 Pages Topic: Education - Social Issues Paper #: 51517017

Gun violence in America doesn’t appear to be going anywhere soon, and deadly rampages have seemed to squeeze their way in the experience of American life. What was once a monstrosity and a horror have all becomes episodes that citizens of this country have all resignedly become accustomed to. Many sociologists have noted that a bizarre desensitization has swept over Americans along with a certain helplessness. Perhaps of all the

Handguns Argument: People Should Be
Words: 601 Length: 2 Pages Topic: Law - Constitutional Law Paper #: 58862361

Those who oppose gun rights argue that society suffers from violence already, and arming more people will only make the problem worse. However, this argument is misguided. As explained above, deterrence alone helps to reduce violent crime. Furthermore, gun safety classes and permitting requirements go a long way toward ensuring that only mentally sound, educated, and qualified individuals may possess a gun. Waiting periods are mandatory in many states, and

Challenging the Beijing Consensus China Foreign Policy in the 21st...
Words: 24240 Length: 60 Pages Topic: Economics Paper #: 17194104

Foreign Policy of China (Beijing consensus) Structure of Chinese Foreign Policy The "Chinese Model" of Investment The "Beijing Consensus" as a Competing Framework Operational Views The U.S.-China (Beijing consensus) Trade Agreement and Beijing Consensus Trading with the Enemy Act Export Control Act. Mutual Defense Assistance Control Act Category B Category C The 1974 Trade Act. The Operational Consequences of Chinese Foreign Policy The World Views and China (Beijing consensus) Expatriates The Managerial Practices Self Sufficiency of China (Beijing consensus) China and western world: A comparison The China (Beijing

Promising Phenomenon That Lends Itself
Words: 26560 Length: 96 Pages Topic: Business Paper #: 20339371

66). Furthermore, social software will only increase in importance in helping organizations maintain and manage their domains of knowledge and information. When networks are enabled and flourish, their value to all users and to the organization increases as well. That increase in value is typically nonlinear, where some additions yield more than proportionate values to the organization (McCluskey and Korobow, 2009). Some of the key characteristics of social software applications