External Audit And Investors Case Study

PAGES
2
WORDS
587
Cite

¶ … boards of this type of organizations accountable? The boards of this type are accountable to the company and its stakeholders/shareholders. They are responsible for the company's overall success. Such a board has to ensure the integrity of its own actions as well as those of the company and should make every effort to present a factual and frank presentation of its current outlook to the company's stakeholders.

Shareholders, thus, are the number one entity to whom such boards are accountable. If shareholders are not happy with the way in which a board is directing a company, they will likely not be shareholders for long or will place pressure on the board for changes in leadership.

The board is also accountable to employees, to members, to supporters and to investors. The rules and regulations that govern a board's actions are the means by which a board is held accountable, but the stakeholders are the ones who really must see that the board is abiding by its charter or mandate and successfully leading the company towards the achievement of its goals. This means actually conducting legitimate audits and not simply allowing such conflicts of interest as described above (one of the original founders of the company performing the so-called external audit, for example).

2. Did Jack make the right decision to invite the two new investors and accept their...

...

Giving the new investors a role on the board and even an executive position for one of them was a selling point for securing their investment. Thus, Jack received what he wanted -- investment money to move the company forward -- and the investors received what they wanted -- involvement in the company's affairs (to varying degrees).
3. Did the investors make the right decision by investing in RC? (Explain why you think it was the right decision or describe what you would have done different)

No, their due diligence was insufficient. They should have had the company externally audited before investing in it and/or agreeing to run it either silently or as CEO (and not by the same auditor who was also a co-founder of the company -- for there is clearly a conflict of interest in such a case). The allure of being part of a company like RC most likely trumped the requisite DD that should go hand in hand with a major investing decision. As the external audit would have proved, RC was insolvent --…

Cite this Document:

"External Audit And Investors" (2016, October 19) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/external-audit-and-investors-2162615

"External Audit And Investors" 19 October 2016. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/external-audit-and-investors-2162615>

"External Audit And Investors", 19 October 2016, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/external-audit-and-investors-2162615

Related Documents

" This project is considered to be the first major update to the Smith Guidance. It was felt that the update was required to shore up some of the deficiencies in the Smith Guidance that have emerged since it was published. There were characteristics of the market that it was felt needed to be addressed, in particular the oligopolistic nature, which exposed the market to considerable uncertainty in the event

However, there has also been hesitation within government to challenge auditors too aggressively. Because accounting scandals have the power to wipe out a major auditing firm, there is considerable sentiment that the existing industry structure needs to be protected, and that all four major firms should be kept from significant scrutiny, lest one of them collapse, ruining competition in the industry. Already the rapid acceleration of audit fees indicates oligopolistic

In other words, if the financial difficulties they encounter are the fault of the auditing firm, they will have protection from any legal ramifications they may have encountered from faulty accounting or auditing measures. Preventive measures are also part of the internal controls of the auditing firm itself, so that each person who works with that firm knows the measures that are to be taken to make sure auditing

Audit Quality and Agency Cost Since the advent of industrialization, there has been the presence of a bond between the people who invest and the people who manage those investments, forming a vital relationship amongst the two groups. Although with the rise of such relationships, the soaring issues of trust and confidence have been a hindrance in economic growth. Viewing the high percentage of the capital of investors or shareholders in

Auditing function has undergone several transformations from the periods when it was simply a function of giving opinion but also to an error where auditors are looked upon to offer advisory roles. The auditors should therefore advice the government on the impacts of their operations on the public and on other improvements that can be made to maximize on the service delivery. In pursuing their taxation policies and fiscal

Bullseye CompanyAn audit is a report given from an analysis of business operations. Business operations are analyzed and set standards set either by regulatory bodies, government, or the audited business itself. The completed product is a final report describing aptitude against the set standards. There are two types of audits, namely internal and external audits. Internal audits are voluntary and conducted within an organization, while external audits are audit reports