Corrections/Police Collaboration Among Intelligence Agencies And Law White Paper

Corrections/Police Collaboration Among Intelligence Agencies and Law Enforcement Agencies

Collaboration occurs when two or more individuals, agencies, or other forms of organizations commence a mutually beneficial relationship toward a shared goal. Collaboration includes a shared determination or will to reach a goal or achieve an objective in many ways such as sharing knowledge/information, sharing resources, combining resources and staff in innovative manners, as well as by constructing and maintaining a consensus. Construction and maintaining a consensus during collaborative efforts keeps every party involved on the same page; there is no one body that retains more knowledge than another or at least all parties involved have the same general sense of the situation or activity. Collaboration is an activity that requires effort in of itself. Collaboration by nature must be two-way or else it is not collaboration, but simply the execution of hierarchy.

Law Enforcement is not a profession or discipline where collaboration is traditionally present. In the 21st century in the United States, certainly in great part due to the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York City on September 11, 2001, there is a new tradition of law enforcement collaboration in effect:

In the aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001, most observers concluded that the U.S. Intelligence Community and law enforcement agencies need to share more information. Most also concluded that operational strategies and tactics -- especially those focused on transnational issues such as terrorism, drugs, counterintelligence, and weapons of mass destruction -- needed to be better integrated. Understanding the need for change, Congress quickly passed the U.S.A. Patriot Act of 2001. It also enacted the Homeland Security Act of 2002 and the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004 (IRTPA). Congress wanted to strengthen...

...

These acts removed many of the barriers to cooperation between intelligence and law enforcement and mandated exchanging information related to international terrorist threats. (AFCEA 2007, 2-3)
Law enforcement collaboration in the United States, for example extends from the local levels to the federal levels on a case-by-case situation. Whereas in the past if a situation was serious enough to be handled by a federal agency, the local and even state law enforcement handling the case up until federal involvement would be phased out, side-tracked, or simply asked to handover their files and the case over to the federal agents. With new trends in law enforcement collaboration, approaches to crime and terrorism have expanded. Agencies are mandated in some cases to show other branches of law enforcement a different kind of professional courtesy and respect with regard to cases where collaboration is ordered or suggested. The paper discusses the trends and effects of collaborations among law enforcement agencies to demonstrate the value of collaboration concern communication and problem-solving.

Collaboration in general is useful for many reasons. Collaboration offers opportunities for cooperation and communication. Cooperation and communication because of collaboration leads to positive effects such as increases in efficiency, productivities, and elimination of redundancies. When intelligence agencies and law enforcement agencies collaborate on endeavors or cases the groups may find they are able to streamline a few to many of the organizational processes. Collaboration helps groups see how another group performs and approaches the same task. Collaborative groups can learn how to achieve their goals by better methods using strategies they may not have come up with within their individual organization.…

Sources Used in Documents:

References:

AFCEA Intelligence Committee. 2007. The Need to Share: The U.S. Intelligence Community and Law Enforcement. AFCEA International, 1 -- 12.

Federal Bureau of Investigation. 2011. FBI Information Sharing Report 2011.

United States Department of Justice. 2006. Fusion Center Guidelines -- Executive Summary. . Available from www.it.ojp.gov.

United States Department of Justice -- Bureau of Justice Assistance. 2005. Intelligence-Led Policing: The New Intelligence Architecture. U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs, 1 -- 49.


Cite this Document:

"Corrections Police Collaboration Among Intelligence Agencies And Law" (2012, June 16) Retrieved April 19, 2024, from
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/corrections-police-collaboration-among-intelligence-110718

"Corrections Police Collaboration Among Intelligence Agencies And Law" 16 June 2012. Web.19 April. 2024. <
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/corrections-police-collaboration-among-intelligence-110718>

"Corrections Police Collaboration Among Intelligence Agencies And Law", 16 June 2012, Accessed.19 April. 2024,
https://www.paperdue.com/essay/corrections-police-collaboration-among-intelligence-110718

Related Documents

This highlights one of the clearest philosophical drawbacks for a correctional focus which is geared toward incapacitation. Indeed, we might regard this as an example where 'just desserts' might be an approach affiliated with the overlooked demands of Pittman's case. Particularly, we can see by the language which was used to convict him, the Pittman's case incited an interest in incapacitation based on the sense that his crimes presented a

Enforcement of European Community Law Legal systems are basically just useless if they are not efficiently enforced. On that note, they have normally two principal devices through which to make sure that these norms are enforced. Firstly, they may make the choice to trust on community enforcement by the state or an organ (Craig, 1998). On the other hand, trusting purely on public enforcement can be incompetent. Even though the

Homeland Security and Preparedness, Response, Activities and Programs in Disaster Response or Disaster Recovery The focus of this study is the homeland security issue as it relates to the preparedness of the U.S.A. government and citizens in response to the emergencies that may emerge. The research question in this study is one that asks in light of the past disasters experienced by the United States such as the events of September 11,

United States has the highest rate of confinement of prisoners per 100,000 population than any other Western country. Analyze this phenomena and discuss actions that you feel are necessary to combat this problem. The United States currently has the highest incarceration rate of any nation worldwide. For example, greater than 60% of nations have incarceration rates below 150 per 100,000 people (Walmsley, 2003). The United States makes up just about

Criminal Justice in Today�s SocietyAbstractThe modern-day society has evolved, and so are the security and social issues that face it. To determine the specific challenges that face today�s society and thus, the criminal justice system, it requires a critical and analytical research study that will filter through the information available and determine the thematic areas that emerge as critical for modern-day criminal justice. Research for this study was done through

Non-Traditional Security Threats and the EU Theoretical Study Terrorism Weapons of Mass Destruction and Nuclear Threat Regional Conflict Organized Crime Environmental Degradation Non-Traditional Security Threats and the EU Due to the discontentment with the conventional concepts of security, the research schedule based on these conventional concepts, associated theoretical debates and their impact on policy, have given rise to the idea of non-traditional security. In the present era, it is universally acknowledged that security possesses multifaceted characteristics. Growing from